Assessment of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Multicenter Time Series Study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011685
Kayla Prezelski, Mario S Blondin Fernandez, Karen Matsumoto, Lisa R David, Christopher M Runyan, Kamlesh B Patel, Alex A Kane, Rami R Hallac
{"title":"Assessment of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Multicenter Time Series Study.","authors":"Kayla Prezelski, Mario S Blondin Fernandez, Karen Matsumoto, Lisa R David, Christopher M Runyan, Kamlesh B Patel, Alex A Kane, Rami R Hallac","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive strip craniectomy is a well-established treatment for sagittal craniosynostosis; however, the temporality of change in head shape has not been assessed. In this study, the authors performed head shape analysis to compare time-series-based clinical outcomes among 3 different surgical techniques across 3 academic centers for the treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, longitudinal 3-dimensional (3D) images were collected from patients who underwent surgery for the correction of sagittal craniosynostosis for up to 5 years postoperation. The surgical methods studied include spring-assisted craniectomy, narrow-strip craniectomy plus orthotic helmet therapy, and wide-strip craniectomy with biparietal and bitemporal barrel stave wedge osteotomies plus orthotic helmet therapy. Postoperative 3D images were binned into 6 age groups. Cranial index measurements were calculated on 3D images. The 3D whole-head composite images were generated for each procedure to visually represent longitudinal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median (interquartile range) cranial index measurements at 3- to 5-years postoperative follow-up were 75.9 (73.1 to 78.6) for spring-assisted, 75.9 (75.4 to 78.5) for narrow-strip, and 79.4 (76.4 to 81.9) for wide-strip procedures. The wide-strip cranial index was significantly different from the spring-assisted and narrow-strip groups ( P < 0.001). Concerning 3D analysis, patients receiving spring-assisted procedures showed normalization of frontal bossing and skull height compared with age-matched controls, whereas patients receiving wide-strip procedures showed greater correction of occipital bulleting. Patients receiving narrow-strip procedures had intermediate results between these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no statistically significant regression in longitudinal cranial index measurements across the 3 techniques aimed at treating sagittal craniosynostosis. Longitudinal comparison of 3D head shape outcome demonstrated satisfactory correction of scaphocephalic deformity across all 3 surgical groups.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, III.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"684-692"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive strip craniectomy is a well-established treatment for sagittal craniosynostosis; however, the temporality of change in head shape has not been assessed. In this study, the authors performed head shape analysis to compare time-series-based clinical outcomes among 3 different surgical techniques across 3 academic centers for the treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis.

Methods: Retrospective, longitudinal 3-dimensional (3D) images were collected from patients who underwent surgery for the correction of sagittal craniosynostosis for up to 5 years postoperation. The surgical methods studied include spring-assisted craniectomy, narrow-strip craniectomy plus orthotic helmet therapy, and wide-strip craniectomy with biparietal and bitemporal barrel stave wedge osteotomies plus orthotic helmet therapy. Postoperative 3D images were binned into 6 age groups. Cranial index measurements were calculated on 3D images. The 3D whole-head composite images were generated for each procedure to visually represent longitudinal outcomes.

Results: The median (interquartile range) cranial index measurements at 3- to 5-years postoperative follow-up were 75.9 (73.1 to 78.6) for spring-assisted, 75.9 (75.4 to 78.5) for narrow-strip, and 79.4 (76.4 to 81.9) for wide-strip procedures. The wide-strip cranial index was significantly different from the spring-assisted and narrow-strip groups ( P < 0.001). Concerning 3D analysis, patients receiving spring-assisted procedures showed normalization of frontal bossing and skull height compared with age-matched controls, whereas patients receiving wide-strip procedures showed greater correction of occipital bulleting. Patients receiving narrow-strip procedures had intermediate results between these outcomes.

Conclusions: There was no statistically significant regression in longitudinal cranial index measurements across the 3 techniques aimed at treating sagittal craniosynostosis. Longitudinal comparison of 3D head shape outcome demonstrated satisfactory correction of scaphocephalic deformity across all 3 surgical groups.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, III.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
矢状颅畸形微创手术技术评估:多中心时间序列研究
背景:微创带状颅骨切除术是治疗矢状颅畸形的一种行之有效的方法,但是头形变化的时间性尚未得到评估。在本研究中,我们进行了头形分析,比较了三个学术中心在治疗矢状颅畸形时采用三种不同手术技术的临床效果:我们对接受矢状颅畸形矫正手术的患者进行了回顾性纵向三维图像采集,采集时间为术后 5 年。研究的手术方法包括弹簧辅助颅骨切除术、窄条状颅骨切除术加矫形头盔疗法、宽条状颅骨切除术加双顶叶和双颞叶桶状楔形截骨术加矫形头盔疗法。术后三维图像被分为六个年龄组。根据三维图像计算颅骨指数。为每种手术生成三维全头复合图像,以直观显示纵向结果:术后 3-5 年随访的中位数和四分位距 (IQR) CI 测量值分别为:弹簧辅助 75.9 [73.1-78.6] ;窄带 75.9 [75.4-78.5] ;宽带 79.4 [76.4-81.9]。宽带 CI 与弹簧辅助组和窄带组有显著差异(P < 0.001)。在三维分析方面,与年龄匹配的对照组相比,弹簧辅助组患者的额部隆起和头骨高度趋于正常,而宽条带组患者的枕骨隆起得到了更大程度的矫正。结论:结论:三种治疗矢状颅畸形的技术在纵向CI测量结果上没有明显的统计学回归。三维头型结果的纵向比较显示,所有三组手术都能令人满意地矫正颅畸形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
期刊最新文献
"Graduating" from Cleft Care and the Illusion of Finality. Comment on "Unmasking Inequality: The Current State of Health Disparities Research in Plastic Surgery". Safety of Brand Discordant Tissue Expanders and Implants in Staged Breast Reconstruction. Versatility of the LICAP Flap for Enhancing Outcomes of Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Knowing that Someone Had Facial Plastic Surgery Does Not Modify Perceptions of Attractiveness or Social Attributes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1