Impact of integrated WASH and maternal and child health interventions on diarrhea disease prevalence in a resource-constrained setting in Kenya.

IF 3.6 Q1 TROPICAL MEDICINE Tropical Medicine and Health Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1186/s41182-024-00616-1
Betty Muriithi, Ernest Apondi Wandera, Rie Takeuchi, Felix Mutunga, Cyrus Kathiiko, Mary Wachira, Joseph Tinkoi, Mirasine Meiguran, Pius Akumu, Valeria Ndege, Ryoichiro Mochizuki, Satoshi Kaneko, Kouichi Morita, Collins Ouma, Yoshio Ichinose
{"title":"Impact of integrated WASH and maternal and child health interventions on diarrhea disease prevalence in a resource-constrained setting in Kenya.","authors":"Betty Muriithi, Ernest Apondi Wandera, Rie Takeuchi, Felix Mutunga, Cyrus Kathiiko, Mary Wachira, Joseph Tinkoi, Mirasine Meiguran, Pius Akumu, Valeria Ndege, Ryoichiro Mochizuki, Satoshi Kaneko, Kouichi Morita, Collins Ouma, Yoshio Ichinose","doi":"10.1186/s41182-024-00616-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) and child health interventions are proven simple and cost-effective strategies for preventing diarrhea and minimizing excess mortality. Individually, they are able to prevent diarrhea though sub-optimally, and their effectiveness when combined may be higher. This study examined the effect of integrated WASH and maternal and child health (MCH) interventions on prevalence of diarrhea, in a resource-limited setting in Kenya.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A controlled intervention was implemented in Narok County. The interventions included WASH interventions integrated with promotion of MCH. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data on targeted indicators before and after the interventions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square to establish the impact of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 431and 424 households and 491 and 487 households in intervention and control sites, respectively, participated in the baseline and endline surveys. Following implementation of the interventions, prevalence of diarrhea decreased by 69.1% (95% CI: 49.6-87.1%) and 58.6% (95% CI: 26.6-82.4%) in the intervention and control site, respectively. Treatment of drinking water and animal husbandry practices were significantly associated with diarrhea post-interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating WASH interventions with other diarrhea control strategies and contextualizing them to meet site-specific needs may effectively prevent diarrhea.</p>","PeriodicalId":23311,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-024-00616-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TROPICAL MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) and child health interventions are proven simple and cost-effective strategies for preventing diarrhea and minimizing excess mortality. Individually, they are able to prevent diarrhea though sub-optimally, and their effectiveness when combined may be higher. This study examined the effect of integrated WASH and maternal and child health (MCH) interventions on prevalence of diarrhea, in a resource-limited setting in Kenya.

Methods: A controlled intervention was implemented in Narok County. The interventions included WASH interventions integrated with promotion of MCH. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data on targeted indicators before and after the interventions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square to establish the impact of the interventions.

Results: A total of 431and 424 households and 491 and 487 households in intervention and control sites, respectively, participated in the baseline and endline surveys. Following implementation of the interventions, prevalence of diarrhea decreased by 69.1% (95% CI: 49.6-87.1%) and 58.6% (95% CI: 26.6-82.4%) in the intervention and control site, respectively. Treatment of drinking water and animal husbandry practices were significantly associated with diarrhea post-interventions.

Conclusions: Integrating WASH interventions with other diarrhea control strategies and contextualizing them to meet site-specific needs may effectively prevent diarrhea.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在肯尼亚资源有限的环境中,讲卫生运动和妇幼保健综合干预措施对腹泻疾病流行的影响。
背景:事实证明,水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)以及儿童健康干预措施是预防腹泻和最大限度降低超额死亡率的简单而经济有效的策略。单独使用这些干预措施可以预防腹泻,但效果并不理想,如果将它们结合起来,效果可能会更好。本研究考察了在肯尼亚资源有限的环境中,综合讲卫生运动和妇幼保健(MCH)干预措施对腹泻发病率的影响:方法:在纳罗克县实施了一项对照干预措施。方法:在纳罗克县实施了一项对照干预措施,干预措施包括讲卫生运动干预措施与促进妇幼保健相结合。采用结构化问卷收集干预前后的目标指标数据。使用描述性统计和卡方对数据进行分析,以确定干预措施的影响:共有 431 和 424 个家庭参加了基线和终点调查,干预点和对照点分别有 491 和 487 个家庭参加。干预措施实施后,干预点和对照点的腹泻发病率分别下降了 69.1%(95% CI:49.6-87.1%)和 58.6%(95% CI:26.6-82.4%)。饮用水处理和畜牧业做法与干预后的腹泻显著相关:结论:将饮水、环卫和讲卫生运动干预措施与其他腹泻控制策略相结合,并根据具体地点的需求加以调整,可有效预防腹泻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine and Health
Tropical Medicine and Health TROPICAL MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
90
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Trends and inequalities in the use of deworming medication during pregnancy in Sierra Leone, 2008-2019. Comments on: prevalence and risk factors for tuberculosis and HIV coinfections in Kenyan prison inmates. Comment on: Fetal femur length and risk of diabetes in adolescence: a prospective cohort study. Reply to: Comment on: Fetal femur length and risk of diabetes in adolescence: a prospective cohort study. Assessment of gestational diabetes mellitus knowledge, attitudes, and practices and associated factors among pregnant women at a district hospital in Coastal Kenya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1