The association between road traffic accidents and visual functions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gloria T Tamenti, Tuwani A Rasengane, Khathutshelo P Mashige
{"title":"The association between road traffic accidents and visual functions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Gloria T Tamenti, Tuwani A Rasengane, Khathutshelo P Mashige","doi":"10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Poor visual functions have been reported to be related to the occurrence of road traffic accidents.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> To review the association between visual function and road traffic accidents (RTAs) from published relevant empirical studies.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> Worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A random effects (RE) model meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 18. Statistical tests conducted include meta-summary statistics, RE meta-analysis (forest plot), meta-regression (relationship between mean age and effect sizes), funnel plots, Egger's and Begg's tests for publication bias and small study effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 17 relevant studies, which were either cross-sectional or observational by design, were included in the meta-analysis. Reported effect sizes were within computed confidence intervals (CI) at 95%. The computed Q test of homogeneity was 61.94. The overall mean effect size of 1.43 (95% CI of 0.985-1.883) was statistically significant at a 5% level (Z = 6.26; p  0.001). The I-squared = 62.17% (p = 0.00) confirmed moderate heterogeneity and the Q-value of 61.94 (p = 0.00) rejected the null hypothesis that the effect size was the same in all the studies. The funnel plot showed that the remaining majority of 13 studies were within the funnel plot on the right-hand side of the line of no effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> These results provide evidence of associations between visual functions and RTAs, and highlight the need for targeted interventions and further research to address the challenges associated with impaired visual functions and road safety.Contributions: The study contributes to the understanding of the implications of visual functions for road safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":47037,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"e1-e10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Poor visual functions have been reported to be related to the occurrence of road traffic accidents.

Aim:  To review the association between visual function and road traffic accidents (RTAs) from published relevant empirical studies.

Setting:  Worldwide.

Methods:  A random effects (RE) model meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 18. Statistical tests conducted include meta-summary statistics, RE meta-analysis (forest plot), meta-regression (relationship between mean age and effect sizes), funnel plots, Egger's and Begg's tests for publication bias and small study effects.

Results:  A total of 17 relevant studies, which were either cross-sectional or observational by design, were included in the meta-analysis. Reported effect sizes were within computed confidence intervals (CI) at 95%. The computed Q test of homogeneity was 61.94. The overall mean effect size of 1.43 (95% CI of 0.985-1.883) was statistically significant at a 5% level (Z = 6.26; p  0.001). The I-squared = 62.17% (p = 0.00) confirmed moderate heterogeneity and the Q-value of 61.94 (p = 0.00) rejected the null hypothesis that the effect size was the same in all the studies. The funnel plot showed that the remaining majority of 13 studies were within the funnel plot on the right-hand side of the line of no effect.

Conclusion:  These results provide evidence of associations between visual functions and RTAs, and highlight the need for targeted interventions and further research to address the challenges associated with impaired visual functions and road safety.Contributions: The study contributes to the understanding of the implications of visual functions for road safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
道路交通事故与视觉功能之间的关系:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
背景:据报道,视觉功能不良与道路交通事故的发生有关: 目的:从已发表的相关实证研究中回顾视觉功能与道路交通事故(RTAs)之间的关系: 环境:全球: 方法:使用 STATA 18 进行随机效应 (RE) 模型荟萃分析。进行的统计检验包括元汇总统计、RE 元分析(森林图)、元回归(平均年龄与效应大小之间的关系)、漏斗图、Egger's 和 Begg's 出版偏倚和小规模研究效应检验: 共有 17 项相关研究被纳入了荟萃分析,这些研究或为横断面研究,或为观察性研究。报告的效应大小在 95% 的计算置信区间 (CI) 内。计算得出的同质性 Q 检验值为 61.94。总体平均效应大小为 1.43(95% 置信区间为 0.985-1.883),在 5% 的水平上具有统计学意义(Z = 6.26;P 0.001)。I-squared = 62.17% (p = 0.00)证实了中度异质性,Q 值 61.94 (p = 0.00)拒绝了所有研究中效应大小相同的零假设。漏斗图显示,其余 13 项研究中的大多数都位于漏斗图中无效应线的右侧: 这些结果提供了视觉功能与道路交通事故之间存在关联的证据,并强调了有必要采取有针对性的干预措施和开展进一步研究,以应对与视觉功能受损和道路安全相关的挑战:贡献:本研究有助于理解视觉功能对道路安全的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Home visits for preterm/low birthweight infants in South Africa: Qualitative evidence synthesis. Next steps for the East, Central and Southern Africa College of Family Physicians (ECSA-CFP). Prevalence and correlates of common mental disorders in people living with HIV in primary health care facilities in Ekurhuleni district. Perceptions of roles of community healthcare workers in early childhood in Limpopo, South Africa. Body composition estimates from bioelectrical impedance and its association with cardiovascular risk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1