Parenthood and the gender division of labour across the income distribution:: the relative importance of relative earnings.

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY European Sociological Review Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-21 DOI:10.1093/esr/jcac036
Allison Dunatchik
{"title":"Parenthood and the gender division of labour across the income distribution:: the relative importance of relative earnings.","authors":"Allison Dunatchik","doi":"10.1093/esr/jcac036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study employs a gendered relative resource approach to examine whether the importance of relative resources in shaping changes in the gender division of labor after first birth varies by couples' household income. A substantial body of scholarship has argued that the gender division of labor within different-sex couples is influenced by partners' relative resources. However, couples face class-based constraints that may alter the relevance of relative resources in shaping changes in gender divisions of labor following the transition to parenthood. This study compares couples' divisions of paid work and housework before and up to four years after first birth, using 28 waves of the British Household Panel Survey and the UK Household Longitudinal Study (N = 1,606 couples). I find that the effect of relative resources on changes in couple's paid work and housework behavior after first birth varies substantially by household income. Among higher-income couples, women's paid work and housework time changes less among those with high relative earnings and more among those with low relative earnings, while men's time allocation varies little after first birth. By contrast, among low-income couples, after first birth women's paid work time and share decreases most among female breadwinners while their male partners' paid work time increases substantially. These findings reflect the greater constraints that low-income couples face in making decisions about the division of household labor after first birth and highlight the need for greater attention to class interactions in the process of gender specialization in both research and work-family policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48237,"journal":{"name":"European Sociological Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcac036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study employs a gendered relative resource approach to examine whether the importance of relative resources in shaping changes in the gender division of labor after first birth varies by couples' household income. A substantial body of scholarship has argued that the gender division of labor within different-sex couples is influenced by partners' relative resources. However, couples face class-based constraints that may alter the relevance of relative resources in shaping changes in gender divisions of labor following the transition to parenthood. This study compares couples' divisions of paid work and housework before and up to four years after first birth, using 28 waves of the British Household Panel Survey and the UK Household Longitudinal Study (N = 1,606 couples). I find that the effect of relative resources on changes in couple's paid work and housework behavior after first birth varies substantially by household income. Among higher-income couples, women's paid work and housework time changes less among those with high relative earnings and more among those with low relative earnings, while men's time allocation varies little after first birth. By contrast, among low-income couples, after first birth women's paid work time and share decreases most among female breadwinners while their male partners' paid work time increases substantially. These findings reflect the greater constraints that low-income couples face in making decisions about the division of household labor after first birth and highlight the need for greater attention to class interactions in the process of gender specialization in both research and work-family policy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
养育子女与收入分配中的性别分工:相对收入的相对重要性》(Parenthood and the gender division of labour across the income distribution:: the relative importance of relative earnings.
本研究采用性别相对资源方法,考察相对资源在影响夫妻双方初次生育后性别分工变化方面的重要性是否因家庭收入而异。大量学术研究认为,不同性别夫妇中的性别分工受伴侣相对资源的影响。然而,夫妻双方面临的阶级限制可能会改变相对资源在形成为人父母后性别分工变化中的相关性。本研究利用英国家庭小组调查和英国家庭纵向研究的 28 个波次(N = 1,606 对夫妇),比较了夫妇在第一次生育前和生育后四年内的有偿工作和家务劳动分工。我发现,相对资源对首次生育后夫妇有偿工作和家务行为变化的影响因家庭收入不同而有很大差异。在高收入夫妇中,相对收入高的夫妇中,女性的有偿工作和家务劳动时间变化较小,而相对收入低的夫妇中,女性的有偿工作和家务劳动时间变化较大,而男性在生育第一胎后的时间分配变化很小。相比之下,在低收入夫妇中,第一次生育后,女性养家者的有偿工作时间和份额减少最多,而其男性伴侣的有偿工作时间则大幅增加。这些发现反映了低收入夫妇在生育第一胎后就家庭劳动分工做出决定时所面临的更大限制,并凸显了在研究和工作-家庭政策中需要更多地关注性别专业化过程中的阶级互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: European Sociological Review contains articles in all fields of sociology ranging in length from short research notes up to major reports.
期刊最新文献
School composition and academic decisions Family structure and policy contexts: implications for tertiary education attainment in 25 European countries Stratifying cities: the effect of outdoor recreation areas on children’s well-being Steeper at the top: cognitive ability and earnings in Finland and Norway Social inequality in admission chances for prestigious higher education programs in Germany: do application patterns matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1