Review and Evidence Gap Map of mentoring programs for adolescent males with disabilities.

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Adolescence Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1002/jad.12398
Mark J Van Ryzin, Jonathan L Rochelle, James Sinclair, John Lind
{"title":"Review and Evidence Gap Map of mentoring programs for adolescent males with disabilities.","authors":"Mark J Van Ryzin, Jonathan L Rochelle, James Sinclair, John Lind","doi":"10.1002/jad.12398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adolescent males with disabilities face unique challenges, and mentoring programs designed for this population could support more positive long-term outcomes. In the current study, a scoping review of empirical research on such programs was conducted. The review was intended to capture the characteristics of existing mentoring program for males with disabilities and map those characteristics in a way that sheds light on the overall status of the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review included different types of mentoring (e.g., adult to child, peer to peer, etc.) as long as the program explicitly defined the formation of a long-term relationship between mentor and mentee. The search identified 21 relevant studies that were categorized using four dimensions: 1) Setting (i.e., school/after school, community-based, on-line/virtual, or mixed); 2) Sex (i.e., males only or mixed males/females); 3) Outcomes (i.e., academics, social-emotional skills, health, transition from high school, or program implementation); and 4) Evaluation methodology (i.e., experimental, nonexperimental, or qualitative). The findings are summarized in an Evidence Gap Map.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only three studies used an experimental design, although they were able to demonstrate significant promise in promoting positive outcomes for youth with disabilities. Beyond these studies, however, there was little evidence supporting program efficacy for males with disabilities, as most studies in the sample were nonexperimental in nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall there are few mentoring programs that target this population, and experimental research on programs that target academic and health outcomes is particularly lacking.</p>","PeriodicalId":48397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12398","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Adolescent males with disabilities face unique challenges, and mentoring programs designed for this population could support more positive long-term outcomes. In the current study, a scoping review of empirical research on such programs was conducted. The review was intended to capture the characteristics of existing mentoring program for males with disabilities and map those characteristics in a way that sheds light on the overall status of the field.

Methods: The review included different types of mentoring (e.g., adult to child, peer to peer, etc.) as long as the program explicitly defined the formation of a long-term relationship between mentor and mentee. The search identified 21 relevant studies that were categorized using four dimensions: 1) Setting (i.e., school/after school, community-based, on-line/virtual, or mixed); 2) Sex (i.e., males only or mixed males/females); 3) Outcomes (i.e., academics, social-emotional skills, health, transition from high school, or program implementation); and 4) Evaluation methodology (i.e., experimental, nonexperimental, or qualitative). The findings are summarized in an Evidence Gap Map.

Results: Only three studies used an experimental design, although they were able to demonstrate significant promise in promoting positive outcomes for youth with disabilities. Beyond these studies, however, there was little evidence supporting program efficacy for males with disabilities, as most studies in the sample were nonexperimental in nature.

Conclusions: Overall there are few mentoring programs that target this population, and experimental research on programs that target academic and health outcomes is particularly lacking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残疾青少年男性辅导计划回顾与证据差距图。
介绍:残疾青少年男性面临着独特的挑战,为这一人群设计的辅导计划可以帮助他们取得更积极的长期成果。本研究对此类项目的实证研究进行了范围界定。综述旨在捕捉现有针对残疾男性的指导计划的特点,并通过描绘这些特点来揭示该领域的整体状况:审查包括不同类型的指导(如成人对儿童、同伴对同伴等),只要该计划明确定义了指导者与被指导者之间长期关系的形成。搜索发现了 21 项相关研究,这些研究从四个方面进行了分类:1)环境(即学校/课后、社区、在线/虚拟或混合);2)性别(即仅限男性或男女混合);3)结果(即学业、社会情感技能、健康、高中过渡或计划实施);4)评估方法(即实验、非实验或定性)。研究结果汇总在 "证据差距图 "中:结果:只有三项研究采用了实验设计,尽管这些研究在促进残疾青少年取得积极成果方面取得了显著成效。然而,除了这些研究之外,几乎没有证据支持针对残疾男性的计划的有效性,因为样本中的大多数研究都是非实验性质的:总体而言,针对这一人群的指导计划很少,尤其缺乏针对学业和健康成果计划的实验研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescence
Journal of Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: The Journal of Adolescence is an international, broad based, cross-disciplinary journal that addresses issues of professional and academic importance concerning development between puberty and the attainment of adult status within society. It provides a forum for all who are concerned with the nature of adolescence, whether involved in teaching, research, guidance, counseling, treatment, or other services. The aim of the journal is to encourage research and foster good practice through publishing both empirical and clinical studies as well as integrative reviews and theoretical advances.
期刊最新文献
Adolescents' meaning making of salient emotional experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gender messages in girls' puberty books: A focus on parent representation. Put at and kept from risk: The sexual risk dilemmas confronting marginalized youth. Pants on fire: Risks for and outcomes of atypical lying. The links between parenting, self-esteem, and depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1