Evaluation of instability in patients with chronic vestibular syndrome using dynamic stability indicators.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1007/s11517-024-03185-x
Yingnan Ma, Xing Gao, Li Wang, Ziyang Lyu, Fei Shen, Haijun Niu
{"title":"Evaluation of instability in patients with chronic vestibular syndrome using dynamic stability indicators.","authors":"Yingnan Ma, Xing Gao, Li Wang, Ziyang Lyu, Fei Shen, Haijun Niu","doi":"10.1007/s11517-024-03185-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gait abnormalities are common in patients with chronic vestibular syndrome (CVS), and stability analysis and gait feature recognition in CVS patients have clinical significance for diagnosing CVS. This study explored two-dimensional dynamic stability indicators for evaluating gait instability in patients with CVS. The Center of Mass acceleration (COMa) peak of CVS patients was significantly faster than that of the control group (p < 0.05), closer to the back of the body, and slower at the Toe-off (TO) moment, which enlarged the Center of Mass position-velocity combination proportion within the Region of Velocity Stability (ROSv). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the Center of Mass velocity (COMv) or COMa peaks were 75.0%, 93.7%, and 90.2% for CVS patients and control groups, respectively. The two-dimensional ROSv parameters improved sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in judging gait instability in patients over traditional dynamic stability parameters. Dynamic stability parameters quantitatively described the differences in dynamic stability during walking between patients with different degrees of CVS and those in the control group. As CVS impairment increases, the patient's dynamic stability decreases. This study provides a reference for the quantitative evaluation of gait stability in patients with CVS.</p>","PeriodicalId":49840,"journal":{"name":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-024-03185-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gait abnormalities are common in patients with chronic vestibular syndrome (CVS), and stability analysis and gait feature recognition in CVS patients have clinical significance for diagnosing CVS. This study explored two-dimensional dynamic stability indicators for evaluating gait instability in patients with CVS. The Center of Mass acceleration (COMa) peak of CVS patients was significantly faster than that of the control group (p < 0.05), closer to the back of the body, and slower at the Toe-off (TO) moment, which enlarged the Center of Mass position-velocity combination proportion within the Region of Velocity Stability (ROSv). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the Center of Mass velocity (COMv) or COMa peaks were 75.0%, 93.7%, and 90.2% for CVS patients and control groups, respectively. The two-dimensional ROSv parameters improved sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in judging gait instability in patients over traditional dynamic stability parameters. Dynamic stability parameters quantitatively described the differences in dynamic stability during walking between patients with different degrees of CVS and those in the control group. As CVS impairment increases, the patient's dynamic stability decreases. This study provides a reference for the quantitative evaluation of gait stability in patients with CVS.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用动态稳定性指标评估慢性前庭综合征患者的不稳定性。
步态异常在慢性前庭综合征(CVS)患者中很常见,CVS 患者的稳定性分析和步态特征识别对诊断 CVS 具有临床意义。本研究探讨了用于评估 CVS 患者步态不稳定性的二维动态稳定性指标。CVS患者的质心加速度(COMa)峰值明显快于对照组(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1963, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (MBEC) continues to serve the biomedical engineering community, covering the entire spectrum of biomedical and clinical engineering. The journal presents exciting and vital experimental and theoretical developments in biomedical science and technology, and reports on advances in computer-based methodologies in these multidisciplinary subjects. The journal also incorporates new and evolving technologies including cellular engineering and molecular imaging. MBEC publishes original research articles as well as reviews and technical notes. Its Rapid Communications category focuses on material of immediate value to the readership, while the Controversies section provides a forum to exchange views on selected issues, stimulating a vigorous and informed debate in this exciting and high profile field. MBEC is an official journal of the International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE).
期刊最新文献
Numerical modeling and analysis of neck injury induced by parachute opening shock. Correction to: Evaluating and enhancing the robustness of vision transformers against adversarial attacks in medical imaging. Mark3D - A semi-automated open-source toolbox for 3D head- surface reconstruction and electrode position registration using a smartphone camera video. Load-bearing optimization for customized exoskeleton design based on kinematic gait reconstruction. Research on imaging biomarkers for chronic subdural hematoma recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1