Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes after Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1089/lap.2024.0234
Kaan Karamık, Hakan Anıl, Ali Yıldız, Ahmet Güzel, Serkan Akdemir, Murat Arslan
{"title":"Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes after Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.","authors":"Kaan Karamık, Hakan Anıl, Ali Yıldız, Ahmet Güzel, Serkan Akdemir, Murat Arslan","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> We aimed to assess the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of patients aged 70 years or older following retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and compare their results with younger patients. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database identified 329 patients who underwent retroperitoneal LPN from January 2013 to October 2022. The patients divided into 2 groups defined by age ≥70 or <70 years at the time of surgery. A propensity score matching analysis was conducted to obtain two balanced groups. The groups were compared for safety (perioperative outcomes) and efficacy (oncological and functional outcomes). <b><i>Results:</i></b> After matching, all variables were well balanced with no differences between the two cohorts. No significant differences were found in perioperative outcomes, including operative time, warm ischemia time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications (<i>P</i> values >.05). Concerning functional outcomes, postoperative glomerular filtration rate and decrease in glomerular filtration rate were significantly better in the younger group compared with the elderly groups (<i>P</i> = .003 and <i>P</i> = .001, respectively). Although margin, ischemia, complications rates were similar between the cohorts (<i>P</i> = .068), Pentafecta rates were lower in the elderly patients (<i>P</i> = .029). In terms of oncological outcomes, recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival were comparable between the groups. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Retroperitoneal LPN can be performed safely and with adequate oncological efficacy in elderly patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"915-920"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to assess the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of patients aged 70 years or older following retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and compare their results with younger patients. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database identified 329 patients who underwent retroperitoneal LPN from January 2013 to October 2022. The patients divided into 2 groups defined by age ≥70 or <70 years at the time of surgery. A propensity score matching analysis was conducted to obtain two balanced groups. The groups were compared for safety (perioperative outcomes) and efficacy (oncological and functional outcomes). Results: After matching, all variables were well balanced with no differences between the two cohorts. No significant differences were found in perioperative outcomes, including operative time, warm ischemia time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications (P values >.05). Concerning functional outcomes, postoperative glomerular filtration rate and decrease in glomerular filtration rate were significantly better in the younger group compared with the elderly groups (P = .003 and P = .001, respectively). Although margin, ischemia, complications rates were similar between the cohorts (P = .068), Pentafecta rates were lower in the elderly patients (P = .029). In terms of oncological outcomes, recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Retroperitoneal LPN can be performed safely and with adequate oncological efficacy in elderly patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹膜后腹腔镜肾部分切除术后老年患者的围手术期、肿瘤学和功能预后:倾向得分匹配分析
目的:我们旨在评估 70 岁或以上患者行腹膜后腹腔镜肾部分切除术(LPN)后的围手术期、肿瘤学和功能预后,并将其结果与年轻患者进行比较。材料与方法:对我们前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性审查,确定了329名在2013年1月至2022年10月期间接受腹膜后LPN手术的患者。患者按年龄≥70岁或结果分为两组:配对后,两组患者的所有变量均十分均衡,无差异。围手术期结果,包括手术时间、温热缺血时间、失血量、住院时间和并发症,均无明显差异(P值>0.05)。在功能结果方面,年轻组的术后肾小球滤过率和肾小球滤过率下降率明显优于老年组(P = .003 和 P = .001)。虽然两组患者的边缘、缺血和并发症发生率相似(P = .068),但老年患者的五联症发生率较低(P = .029)。在肿瘤学结果方面,两组患者的无复发生存率和癌症特异性生存率相当。结论腹膜后 LPN 可以在老年患者中安全进行,并具有足够的肿瘤疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
期刊最新文献
Application of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Laparoscopic Liver Resection with Pringle Maneuver: A Comparative Study with the Pringle Maneuver. Short-Term Efficacy of LCBDE+LC Versus ERCP/EST+LC in the Treatment of Cholelithiasis Combined with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Evaluation of Surgical Results and Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal and Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Approaches in Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Analysis. Is Endoscopic Resection Essential for Patients with Type 1 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor? Is It Necessary to Endoscopically Evaluate the Anastomosis in Robotic or Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures for Colorectal Cancer?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1