Perspectives and Factors Related to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States: A Mixed-Methods Study on the Role of History of PrEP Use.

Junye Ma, Zach Soberano, Bryce F Stamp, Matthew Rosso, Lisa Hightow-Weidman, Kimberly A Powers, Jacob Benjamin Stocks, Sybil Hosek, Keith J Horvath
{"title":"Perspectives and Factors Related to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States: A Mixed-Methods Study on the Role of History of PrEP Use.","authors":"Junye Ma, Zach Soberano, Bryce F Stamp, Matthew Rosso, Lisa Hightow-Weidman, Kimberly A Powers, Jacob Benjamin Stocks, Sybil Hosek, Keith J Horvath","doi":"10.1097/JNC.0000000000000489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study quantitatively examined factors related to young men who have sex with men (YMSM)'s decisions to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) by their history of PrEP use and qualitatively elicited their perspectives on PrEP options. Higher proportions of YMSM who had never used (vs. ever used) PrEP considered the following factors as important in their decisions to use PrEP: (a) Returning to PrEP follow-up visits (p = .02), (b) having to talk about sex/PrEP with providers (p = .013), (c) people assuming they are infected with HIV (p = .021), (d) family finding out about their PrEP use (p = .001), and (e) friends finding out about their PrEP use (p = .008). Through inductive content analysis, qualitative data showed that a higher proportion of YMSM who had never used PrEP (vs. ever used) expressed concerns about HIV stigma from nonaffirming health care providers and the potential risk of inadvertently revealing their LGBTQ+ identity to others, which were described as potential barriers to PrEP use. Overall, our findings suggest that future interventions may consider tailoring PrEP messaging to YMSM's history of PrEP use, which may ultimately increase PrEP uptake and adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":50263,"journal":{"name":"Janac-Journal of the Association of Nurses in Aids Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Janac-Journal of the Association of Nurses in Aids Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNC.0000000000000489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This study quantitatively examined factors related to young men who have sex with men (YMSM)'s decisions to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) by their history of PrEP use and qualitatively elicited their perspectives on PrEP options. Higher proportions of YMSM who had never used (vs. ever used) PrEP considered the following factors as important in their decisions to use PrEP: (a) Returning to PrEP follow-up visits (p = .02), (b) having to talk about sex/PrEP with providers (p = .013), (c) people assuming they are infected with HIV (p = .021), (d) family finding out about their PrEP use (p = .001), and (e) friends finding out about their PrEP use (p = .008). Through inductive content analysis, qualitative data showed that a higher proportion of YMSM who had never used PrEP (vs. ever used) expressed concerns about HIV stigma from nonaffirming health care providers and the potential risk of inadvertently revealing their LGBTQ+ identity to others, which were described as potential barriers to PrEP use. Overall, our findings suggest that future interventions may consider tailoring PrEP messaging to YMSM's history of PrEP use, which may ultimately increase PrEP uptake and adherence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国年轻男男性行为者使用暴露前预防疗法的观点和相关因素:关于 PrEP 使用历史的作用的混合方法研究》(A Mixed-Methods Study on the Role of History of PrEP Use)。
摘要:本研究根据年轻男男性行为者(YMSM)使用 PrEP 的历史,定量研究了与他们决定使用暴露前预防疗法(PrEP)相关的因素,并从定性角度了解了他们对 PrEP 选择的看法。在从未使用过(与曾经使用过)PrEP 的男男性行为者中,认为以下因素对其决定使用 PrEP 有重要影响的比例较高:(a) PrEP 复诊(p = 0.02),(b) 必须与提供者谈论性/PrEP(p = 0.013),(c) 人们认为他们感染了 HIV(p = 0.021),(d) 家人发现他们使用 PrEP(p = 0.001),以及 (e) 朋友发现他们使用 PrEP(p = 0.008)。通过归纳内容分析,定性数据显示,从未使用过 PrEP(相对于曾经使用过)的青年男性同性恋者中,有较高比例的人对来自不认可他们的医疗服务提供者的艾滋病污名化以及无意中向他人透露其 LGBTQ+ 身份的潜在风险表示担忧,并将其视为使用 PrEP 的潜在障碍。总之,我们的研究结果表明,未来的干预措施可以考虑根据 YMSM 使用 PrEP 的历史记录定制 PrEP 信息,这最终可能会提高 PrEP 的接受率和坚持率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care (JANAC) is a peer-reviewed, international nursing journal that covers the full spectrum of the global HIV epidemic, focusing on prevention, evidence-based care management, interprofessional clinical care, research, advocacy, policy, education, social determinants of health, epidemiology, and program development. JANAC functions according to the highest standards of ethical publishing practices and offers innovative publication options, including Open Access and prepublication article posting, where the journal can post articles before they are published with an issue.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Disruption of Health Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Adults Living With HIV by Age in Essex County, NJ: A Cross-Sectional Study. Perceived Stress and Health Outcomes Among Latinx and Non-Latinx White Adult People With HIV in East Harlem, New York: A Cross-Sectional Study. An Integrative Review of the Literature Examining Sexual Relationship Power, Depressive Symptoms, Silencing the Self, and HIV Vulnerability for Women in the United States. Smoking and Type 1 Versus Type 2 Myocardial Infarction Among People With HIV in the United States. Advancing Vaccine Uptake in People With HIV: A Call for Research on Trust and Intellectual Humility in Health Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1