Learning Networks: How Family Medicine Departments Are Meeting the Requirement.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI:10.22454/FamMed.2024.556157
Dean A Seehusen, Isabella Brout, Stephen A Wilson
{"title":"Learning Networks: How Family Medicine Departments Are Meeting the Requirement.","authors":"Dean A Seehusen, Isabella Brout, Stephen A Wilson","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2024.556157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In 2023, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education added participation within a \"learning collaborative\" or \"learning network\" (LN) as a requirement for family medicine residencies. The structure and scope of what makes an acceptable LN was only vaguely defined. The purpose of this study was to learn how many family medicine residencies associated with departments already belong to LNs, the purpose and funding of these existing LNs, and barriers to entering LNs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was sent to family medicine department chairs through a Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance omnibus study from August to September 2023. Survey questions explored the purpose, structure, and funding of LNs that associated residency programs already belonged to as well as the chairs' beliefs and knowledge about LNs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 227 chairs, 119 completed the survey (50.2%). About 53% reported that their department was part of an LN, with more than one-third belonging for 5 years or less; 47% had a low understanding of what an LN is; and 71% had little to no concern that collaborating in an LN would negatively affect residency recruitment. The purpose of most LNs was a mix of research, education, and clinical activities. Faculty's lack of knowledge about LNs and lack of time were the top barriers identified to joining an LN. Funding was varied, and departmental funding was positively associated with administrative control of the LN.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>About half of the residency programs associated with family medicine departments already belong to LNs. Wide variation among existing LNs may lead to significantly disparate outcomes for residents and residencies as they navigate this new requirement.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2024.556157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: In 2023, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education added participation within a "learning collaborative" or "learning network" (LN) as a requirement for family medicine residencies. The structure and scope of what makes an acceptable LN was only vaguely defined. The purpose of this study was to learn how many family medicine residencies associated with departments already belong to LNs, the purpose and funding of these existing LNs, and barriers to entering LNs.

Methods: An online survey was sent to family medicine department chairs through a Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance omnibus study from August to September 2023. Survey questions explored the purpose, structure, and funding of LNs that associated residency programs already belonged to as well as the chairs' beliefs and knowledge about LNs.

Results: Of the 227 chairs, 119 completed the survey (50.2%). About 53% reported that their department was part of an LN, with more than one-third belonging for 5 years or less; 47% had a low understanding of what an LN is; and 71% had little to no concern that collaborating in an LN would negatively affect residency recruitment. The purpose of most LNs was a mix of research, education, and clinical activities. Faculty's lack of knowledge about LNs and lack of time were the top barriers identified to joining an LN. Funding was varied, and departmental funding was positively associated with administrative control of the LN.

Conclusions: About half of the residency programs associated with family medicine departments already belong to LNs. Wide variation among existing LNs may lead to significantly disparate outcomes for residents and residencies as they navigate this new requirement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习网络:全科医学科如何满足要求。
背景和目标:2023 年,毕业后医学教育认证委员会将参与 "学习合作 "或 "学习网络"(LN)作为家庭医学住院医师培训的一项要求。但对可接受的学习网络的结构和范围仅有模糊的定义。本研究旨在了解有多少与科室相关的家庭医学住院医师已经加入了 LN,这些现有 LN 的目的和资金来源,以及加入 LN 的障碍:2023 年 8 月至 9 月,通过全科医学教育研究联盟理事会的一项综合研究,向全科医学系主任发送了一份在线调查。调查问题涉及相关住院医师培训项目已加入的LNs的目的、结构和资金来源,以及系主任对LNs的看法和了解:在 227 位系主任中,119 位完成了调查(50.2%)。约53%的人称他们所在的科室是LN的一部分,其中超过三分之一的人加入LN的时间为5年或更短;47%的人对LN的含义了解不多;71%的人几乎不担心与LN合作会对住院医师招募产生负面影响。大多数 LN 的目的是混合研究、教育和临床活动。教员对 LN 缺乏了解和缺乏时间是加入 LN 的最大障碍。资金来源各不相同,系部资金与 LN 的行政控制呈正相关:结论:与全科医学系相关的住院医师培训项目中,约有一半已经加入了LN。结论:与全科医学系相关的住院医师培训项目中,约有一半已经加入了LNs。现有LNs之间的巨大差异可能会导致住院医师和住院医师培训项目在应对这一新要求时出现明显的结果差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
期刊最新文献
Authors' Response to "The Growing Divide Between Teaching Empathy and Being Empathetic". The Growing Divide Between Teaching Empathy and Being Empathetic. An Exploratory Study of Published Case Reports Using a Systematic Typology. Supporting International Medical Graduate Workforce Integration in the 2024 US Election. Three Types of Uncertainty: A Qualitative Study of Family Medicine Residents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1