Identifying optimum implementation for human papillomavirus self-sampling in underserved communities: A systematic review.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Medical Screening Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1177/09691413241274312
Olivia Mackay, Kate Joanna Lifford, Anahat Kalra, Denitza Williams
{"title":"Identifying optimum implementation for human papillomavirus self-sampling in underserved communities: A systematic review.","authors":"Olivia Mackay, Kate Joanna Lifford, Anahat Kalra, Denitza Williams","doi":"10.1177/09691413241274312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the existing evidence to identify the optimum methods for implementing human papillomavirus self-sampling to increase screening uptake for underserved groups.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Specific groups are less likely to participate in cervical screening. These include individuals from low socioeconomic status groups, ethnic minority groups, younger age groups (25-29), older age groups (≥50), with a physical disability, with a learning disability and with an LGBTQ+ identity. The advent of human papillomavirus self-sampling for cervical screening presents an opportunity to promote equitable access to screening. Implementation for human papillomavirus self-sampling can vary, for example, opt-out or opt-in approaches. However, it is unclear which of these is the best method of offering human papillomavirus self-sampling to underserved groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six databases were searched through May 2023. Studies comparing cervico-vaginal human papillomavirus self-sampling provision using different implementation strategies with the standard screening pathway in underserved groups were identified. A narrative synthesis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4574 studies were identified; 25 studies were included, of which 22 were from high-income countries. Greater uptake was found for offering human papillomavirus self-sampling compared to standard clinician-based sampling. Directly mailing human papillomavirus self-sampling kits to participants resulted in higher uptake of screening than using an 'opt-in' approach or standard recall in low socioeconomic status and ethnic minority groups, and older women. Strategies that used community health workers or educational materials increased uptake in ethnic minority and low socioeconomic status groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Directly mailing human papillomavirus self-sampling kits to low socioeconomic status groups, ethnic minority groups and older women has the potential to increase uptake of human papillomavirus self-sampling. Using community health workers to offer human papillomavirus self-sampling should be considered for ethnic minority and low socioeconomic status groups. Further research exploring the preferences of younger women is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"9691413241274312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413241274312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To review the existing evidence to identify the optimum methods for implementing human papillomavirus self-sampling to increase screening uptake for underserved groups.

Setting: Specific groups are less likely to participate in cervical screening. These include individuals from low socioeconomic status groups, ethnic minority groups, younger age groups (25-29), older age groups (≥50), with a physical disability, with a learning disability and with an LGBTQ+ identity. The advent of human papillomavirus self-sampling for cervical screening presents an opportunity to promote equitable access to screening. Implementation for human papillomavirus self-sampling can vary, for example, opt-out or opt-in approaches. However, it is unclear which of these is the best method of offering human papillomavirus self-sampling to underserved groups.

Methods: Six databases were searched through May 2023. Studies comparing cervico-vaginal human papillomavirus self-sampling provision using different implementation strategies with the standard screening pathway in underserved groups were identified. A narrative synthesis was conducted.

Results: In total, 4574 studies were identified; 25 studies were included, of which 22 were from high-income countries. Greater uptake was found for offering human papillomavirus self-sampling compared to standard clinician-based sampling. Directly mailing human papillomavirus self-sampling kits to participants resulted in higher uptake of screening than using an 'opt-in' approach or standard recall in low socioeconomic status and ethnic minority groups, and older women. Strategies that used community health workers or educational materials increased uptake in ethnic minority and low socioeconomic status groups.

Conclusions: Directly mailing human papillomavirus self-sampling kits to low socioeconomic status groups, ethnic minority groups and older women has the potential to increase uptake of human papillomavirus self-sampling. Using community health workers to offer human papillomavirus self-sampling should be considered for ethnic minority and low socioeconomic status groups. Further research exploring the preferences of younger women is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在服务不足的社区确定人类乳头瘤病毒自我采样的最佳实施方案:系统综述。
目的回顾现有证据,确定实施人类乳头瘤病毒自我采样的最佳方法,以提高服务不足群体的筛查率:特定群体不太可能参加宫颈筛查。这些群体包括社会经济地位低下群体、少数民族群体、年轻群体(25-29 岁)、老年群体(≥50 岁)、身体残疾者、学习障碍者和 LGBTQ+ 身份者。人类乳头瘤病毒自我采样宫颈筛查的出现为促进公平筛查提供了机会。人类乳头瘤病毒自我采样的实施方式可以多种多样,例如选择退出或选择接受。然而,目前还不清楚哪种方法是向服务不足的群体提供人类乳头瘤病毒自我采样的最佳方法:方法:检索了截至 2023 年 5 月的六个数据库。方法:检索了截至 2023 年 5 月的 6 个数据库,并对在服务不足群体中采用不同实施策略提供宫颈阴道人类乳头瘤病毒自我采样与标准筛查途径的研究进行了比较。结果:结果:共确定了 4574 项研究;纳入了 25 项研究,其中 22 项来自高收入国家。与标准的临床医生采样相比,提供人类乳头瘤病毒自我采样的接受率更高。在社会经济地位较低、少数民族群体和老年妇女中,直接向参与者邮寄人类乳头瘤病毒自我采样包比使用 "选择接受 "方法或标准召回方法的筛查接受率更高。在少数族裔和社会经济地位较低的群体中,使用社区卫生工作者或教育材料的策略提高了接受率:结论:向社会经济地位低的群体、少数民族群体和老年妇女直接邮寄人类乳头瘤病毒自我采样工具包有可能提高人类乳头瘤病毒自我采样的接受率。对于少数民族和社会经济地位较低的群体,应考虑利用社区卫生工作者提供人类乳头瘤病毒自我采样服务。还需要进一步研究年轻妇女的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
期刊最新文献
Age-specific differences in tumour characteristics between screen-detected and non-screen-detected breast cancers in women aged 40-74 at diagnosis in Sweden from 2008 to 2017. Association between time to colonoscopy after positive fecal testing and colorectal cancer outcomes in Alberta, Canada. Cancer screening programs in Japan: Progress and challenges. Strong association between reduction of late-stage cancers and reduction of cancer-specific mortality in meta-regression of randomized screening trials across multiple cancer types. Factors associated with private or public breast cancer screening attendance in Queensland, Australia: A retrospective cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1