Racial, Ethnic, and Language Inequities in Ambulatory Pediatrics Patient Family Experience

Abstract

Objective

To determine the association of patient race, patient-provider racial congruence, patient ethnicity, and family primary language with patient family experience (PFE) survey responses.

Methods

Cross-sectional review of PFE survey responses from all ambulatory medical encounters at a large, urban children’s hospital system June 1, 2020—May 31, 2022. Exposures were patient race, patient-provider racial congruence, patient ethnicity, and family primary language. We adjusted analyses for neighborhood-level socioeconomic deprivation, patient sex and age, encounter specialty, and location of care. Outcomes were PFE survey scores for five questions focused on overall experience, respect, and safety; categorized using industry standard metric of presence of a “top-box” score, defined as a nine or 10 for questions on an 11-point scale or as four on a four-point scale.

Results

We included 89,175 surveys (15.6% response rate). The odds of having optimal, “top-box” responses for several assessed questions were lower for patients identified as Asian (eg, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40, 0.52) or Black (eg, OR 0.65; CI 0.60, 0.70) compared to White, and for Hispanic (eg, OR 0.84; CI 0.72, 0.97) compared to non-Hispanic. Similarly, the odds of having “top-box” scores were lower for Spanish-primary-language (eg, OR 0.38; CI 0.30, 0.48) compared to English-primary-language patients. Patient-provider racial congruence had higher odds of “top-box” responses for two of five assessed questions (eg, OR 1.18; CI 1.04, 1.35).

Conclusions

We found previously unreported inequities in ambulatory pediatric PFE outcomes, with worse experiences reported by Asian, Black, Hispanic, and Spanish-language patients.