Epidemiology of High-Energy Distal Radius Fractures.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1142/S2424835524500395
Janice Chin-Yi Liao, Amaris Lim, David Meng-Kiat Tan, Alphonsus Khin-Sze Chong
{"title":"Epidemiology of High-Energy Distal Radius Fractures.","authors":"Janice Chin-Yi Liao, Amaris Lim, David Meng-Kiat Tan, Alphonsus Khin-Sze Chong","doi":"10.1142/S2424835524500395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> High-energy distal radius fractures have not been as well studied as the more common osteoporotic fractures. Differences between these two groups of fractures have implications on the prevention and clinical management of such injuries. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective review was conducted of all patients in our institution who presented with distal radius fractures within the period of a year. Demographic data, injury mechanism, fracture classification, associated injuries and work-related status were obtained and analysed. <b>Results:</b> High energy fractures made up 27.1% of the cases. Falls from height were the most common cause, followed by motor vehicle accidents. These high-energy fractures were more commonly seen in males, younger patients (average age 41 vs. 61 years), and in workplace accidents. These injuries were also more likely to be bilateral and associated with an additional ipsilateral upper extremity injury. The high-energy group was also more likely to have an AO type B fracture. <b>Conclusions:</b> A substantial proportion of distal radius fractures seen in our population are high-energy injuries. Their contrasting patient and injury profiles suggest that they should be considered separately from osteoporotic fractures. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"424-428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524500395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-energy distal radius fractures have not been as well studied as the more common osteoporotic fractures. Differences between these two groups of fractures have implications on the prevention and clinical management of such injuries. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients in our institution who presented with distal radius fractures within the period of a year. Demographic data, injury mechanism, fracture classification, associated injuries and work-related status were obtained and analysed. Results: High energy fractures made up 27.1% of the cases. Falls from height were the most common cause, followed by motor vehicle accidents. These high-energy fractures were more commonly seen in males, younger patients (average age 41 vs. 61 years), and in workplace accidents. These injuries were also more likely to be bilateral and associated with an additional ipsilateral upper extremity injury. The high-energy group was also more likely to have an AO type B fracture. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of distal radius fractures seen in our population are high-energy injuries. Their contrasting patient and injury profiles suggest that they should be considered separately from osteoporotic fractures. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高能量桡骨远端骨折的流行病学。
背景:与更常见的骨质疏松性骨折相比,对高能量桡骨远端骨折的研究并不深入。这两类骨折之间的差异对此类损伤的预防和临床治疗具有重要意义。研究方法对我院一年内所有桡骨远端骨折患者进行回顾性研究。获得并分析了人口统计学数据、受伤机制、骨折分类、相关损伤和工作相关状况。结果显示高能量骨折占 27.1%。高空坠落是最常见的原因,其次是机动车事故。这些高能量骨折更常见于男性、年轻患者(平均年龄 41 岁对 61 岁)和工作场所事故。这些损伤也更有可能是双侧的,并伴有同侧上肢的损伤。高能量组也更有可能发生 AO B 型骨折。结论:在我们的人群中,有相当一部分桡骨远端骨折属于高能量损伤。患者和损伤情况的对比表明,应将其与骨质疏松性骨折分开考虑。证据等级:IV级(治疗)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
期刊最新文献
An Algorithm for Management of Radial Longitudinal Deficiency. Camptodactyly. Factors Affecting Appearance after Thumb Polydactyly Reconstruction - A Caregiver's Perspective in an Asian Population. Paediatric Hand Fractures - A Review. Surgical Treatment for Chronic Anterior Dislocation of the Radial Head.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1