Validation of the Chicken Femur as a Model for the Human Metacarpal: An In-Vitro Analysis.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1142/S2424835524500383
Abhirup Lobo, David Ackland, Dale Robinson, Stephen K Y Tham
{"title":"Validation of the Chicken Femur as a Model for the Human Metacarpal: An In-Vitro Analysis.","authors":"Abhirup Lobo, David Ackland, Dale Robinson, Stephen K Y Tham","doi":"10.1142/S2424835524500383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the chicken femur as a laboratory model for the human metacarpal by comparing the bone microarchitecture and mechanical properties of chicken femurs to human cadaveric metacarpals. <b>Methods:</b> Sixteen fresh chicken femora and 20 fresh frozen cadaveric human metacarpals were imaged using a micro computed tomography scanner. The bones were then mechanically tested using four-point-bending and torsional testing. <b>Results:</b> There were no significant differences in macroscopic features between chicken femora and human metacarpals, including overall length, external radius, internal radius, cortical width and cross-sectional area of the diaphyseal cortex (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the trabecular number and spacing in the distal metaphysis of both groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The diaphysis and proximal metaphysis did not share any microarchitectural similarities. Four-point bending tests resulted in significantly higher yield forces, ultimate force, failure points and stiffness in human metacarpals (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Torsion tests resulted in significant higher ultimate torque and torsional rigidity in human metacarpals (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> The chicken femur has structural and biomechanical differences to the fresh frozen human metacarpal despite the similarity in their macroscopic features.</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"418-423"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524500383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the chicken femur as a laboratory model for the human metacarpal by comparing the bone microarchitecture and mechanical properties of chicken femurs to human cadaveric metacarpals. Methods: Sixteen fresh chicken femora and 20 fresh frozen cadaveric human metacarpals were imaged using a micro computed tomography scanner. The bones were then mechanically tested using four-point-bending and torsional testing. Results: There were no significant differences in macroscopic features between chicken femora and human metacarpals, including overall length, external radius, internal radius, cortical width and cross-sectional area of the diaphyseal cortex (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the trabecular number and spacing in the distal metaphysis of both groups (p > 0.05). The diaphysis and proximal metaphysis did not share any microarchitectural similarities. Four-point bending tests resulted in significantly higher yield forces, ultimate force, failure points and stiffness in human metacarpals (p < 0.05). Torsion tests resulted in significant higher ultimate torque and torsional rigidity in human metacarpals (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The chicken femur has structural and biomechanical differences to the fresh frozen human metacarpal despite the similarity in their macroscopic features.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鸡股骨作为人类掌骨模型的验证:体外分析
研究背景本研究旨在通过比较鸡股骨和人类尸体掌骨的骨微结构和机械性能,评估鸡股骨作为人类掌骨实验室模型的价值。研究方法使用微型计算机断层扫描仪对 16 块新鲜鸡股骨和 20 块新鲜冷冻人类掌骨尸体进行成像。然后使用四点弯曲和扭转测试对骨骼进行机械测试。结果显示鸡股骨和人类掌骨的宏观特征,包括总长度、外半径、内半径、皮质宽度和骺皮质横截面积,均无明显差异(P > 0.05)。两组远端干骺端的骨小梁数量和间距无明显差异(P > 0.05)。干骺端和近端干骺端在微结构上没有任何相似之处。四点弯曲测试导致人类掌骨的屈服力、极限力、破坏点和刚度明显更高(p < 0.05)。扭转测试导致人类掌骨的极限扭矩和扭转刚度明显更高(p < 0.05)。结论尽管鸡股骨的宏观特征与新鲜冷冻的人类掌骨相似,但两者在结构和生物力学方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
期刊最新文献
An Algorithm for Management of Radial Longitudinal Deficiency. Camptodactyly. Factors Affecting Appearance after Thumb Polydactyly Reconstruction - A Caregiver's Perspective in an Asian Population. Paediatric Hand Fractures - A Review. Surgical Treatment for Chronic Anterior Dislocation of the Radial Head.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1