Racial salience modulated the face race lightness illusion: A comparative study of Caucasians and Asians

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY Attention Perception & Psychophysics Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.3758/s13414-024-02947-x
Linlin Yan, Yiwen Zhu, Yang Shen, Zurui Zhang, Yajie Liang, Zhe Wang, Yu-Hao P. Sun
{"title":"Racial salience modulated the face race lightness illusion: A comparative study of Caucasians and Asians","authors":"Linlin Yan,&nbsp;Yiwen Zhu,&nbsp;Yang Shen,&nbsp;Zurui Zhang,&nbsp;Yajie Liang,&nbsp;Zhe Wang,&nbsp;Yu-Hao P. Sun","doi":"10.3758/s13414-024-02947-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous research has demonstrated the existence of the face race lightness (FRL) illusion. It indicates that Black faces tend to appear darker than White faces, even when their luminance values are objectively adjusted to be the same. However, the debate over the exclusive influence of face-race categories on the FRL illusion continues, with the impact of racial groups on the illusion remaining relatively unexplored. To address these gaps, we conducted studies to investigate whether the FRL illusion varies in terms of racial salience and racial groups. We manipulated the racial salience by altering the orientation of the faces. A total of 64 Caucasians (Study 1) and 63 Asians (Study 2) were recruited. Participants were shown pairs of faces in rapid succession and were asked to report which face appeared lighter or darker. In each trial, the two faces belonged to the same race category: Black, Black–White ambiguous, or White. The luminance of the first face remained consistent across trials while the luminance of the second face varied and was adjusted across eight levels (− 20, − 12, − 8, − 4, + 4, + 8, + 12, + 20). Our findings reveal that the FRL illusion is largely dependent on the salience of face-race information. When faces were presented upright, the FRL illusion was prominent; however, it disappeared when faces were inverted. Remarkably, the FRL illusion was observed not only in Caucasians but also in Asians. Therefore, our results suggest that the FRL illusion primarily stems from race salience rather than participants’ racial groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-024-02947-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated the existence of the face race lightness (FRL) illusion. It indicates that Black faces tend to appear darker than White faces, even when their luminance values are objectively adjusted to be the same. However, the debate over the exclusive influence of face-race categories on the FRL illusion continues, with the impact of racial groups on the illusion remaining relatively unexplored. To address these gaps, we conducted studies to investigate whether the FRL illusion varies in terms of racial salience and racial groups. We manipulated the racial salience by altering the orientation of the faces. A total of 64 Caucasians (Study 1) and 63 Asians (Study 2) were recruited. Participants were shown pairs of faces in rapid succession and were asked to report which face appeared lighter or darker. In each trial, the two faces belonged to the same race category: Black, Black–White ambiguous, or White. The luminance of the first face remained consistent across trials while the luminance of the second face varied and was adjusted across eight levels (− 20, − 12, − 8, − 4, + 4, + 8, + 12, + 20). Our findings reveal that the FRL illusion is largely dependent on the salience of face-race information. When faces were presented upright, the FRL illusion was prominent; however, it disappeared when faces were inverted. Remarkably, the FRL illusion was observed not only in Caucasians but also in Asians. Therefore, our results suggest that the FRL illusion primarily stems from race salience rather than participants’ racial groups.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族显著性调节人脸种族亮度错觉:白种人与亚洲人的比较研究。
以往的研究已经证明了人脸种族亮度(FRL)错觉的存在。这种错觉表明,黑人的脸往往看起来比白人的脸暗,即使他们的亮度值被客观地调整为相同。然而,关于人脸种族类别对人脸亮度错觉的唯一影响的争论仍在继续,而种族群体对人脸亮度错觉的影响相对来说仍未得到探讨。为了填补这些空白,我们开展了研究,以调查 FRL 幻觉是否会因种族显著性和种族群体而变化。我们通过改变人脸的朝向来操纵种族显著性。我们共招募了 64 名白种人(研究 1)和 63 名亚洲人(研究 2)。我们向受试者快速连续展示了两对人脸,并要求他们报告哪张人脸看起来更亮或更暗。在每次试验中,两张面孔属于同一种族类别:黑色、黑白模糊或白色。第一张脸的亮度在每次试验中都保持一致,而第二张脸的亮度则各不相同,并在八个等级(- 20、- 12、- 8、- 4、+ 4、+ 8、+ 12、+ 20)中进行调整。我们的研究结果表明,FRL 错觉在很大程度上取决于脸部种族信息的显著性。当面孔直立呈现时,FRL 错觉非常明显;然而,当面孔倒置时,FRL 错觉就消失了。值得注意的是,FRL 错觉不仅出现在白种人身上,也出现在亚洲人身上。因此,我们的研究结果表明,FRL 错觉主要源于种族显著性,而非参与者的种族群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
期刊最新文献
Viewed touch influences tactile detection by altering decision criterion. Editorial for Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. Inhibition of return in a 3D scene depends on the direction of depth switch between cue and target. Crossmodal correspondence of elevation/pitch and size/pitch is driven by real-world features. Effect of attention on ensemble perception: Comparison between exogenous attention, endogenous attention, and depth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1