Mandibular reconstruction after post-traumatic complex fracture: Comparison analysis between traditional and virtually planned surgery

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102029
Stefania Troise , Gianluca Renato De Fazio , Umberto Committeri , Raffaele Spinelli , Maria Nocera , Emanuele Carraturo , Giovanni Salzano , Antonio Arena , Vincenzo Abbate , Paola Bonavolontà , Antonio Romano , Giovanni Dell'Aversana Orabona , Luigi Angelo Vaira , Pasquale Piombino
{"title":"Mandibular reconstruction after post-traumatic complex fracture: Comparison analysis between traditional and virtually planned surgery","authors":"Stefania Troise ,&nbsp;Gianluca Renato De Fazio ,&nbsp;Umberto Committeri ,&nbsp;Raffaele Spinelli ,&nbsp;Maria Nocera ,&nbsp;Emanuele Carraturo ,&nbsp;Giovanni Salzano ,&nbsp;Antonio Arena ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Abbate ,&nbsp;Paola Bonavolontà ,&nbsp;Antonio Romano ,&nbsp;Giovanni Dell'Aversana Orabona ,&nbsp;Luigi Angelo Vaira ,&nbsp;Pasquale Piombino","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Jaw reconstruction after complex post-traumatic fracture is still a challenge for surgeons using traditional surgery. Virtual surgical planning has proven to be a valid tool for managing these fractures. The aim of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the VSP effectiveness compared to traditional surgery in the management of complex mandibular fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>30 patients with diagnosis of complex mandibular fracture were enrolled and divided in two groups: Group A (virtually planned surgery), The plate was pre-modeled and employed during the surgery; Group B (traditional surgery), the plate was shaped directly during the surgery. Virtually planned and post-operative Computer Tomography were after compared for both the groups to highlight discrepancies in mm.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fracture surgical reduction was successful without intraoperative complications. In Group A, all the mean discrepancies’ values were &lt;1 mm while in Group B the values were included between 1.36 and 1.94 mm. The mean operative time was 69 min for Group A, while 106 min for Group B.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Fracture virtual reduction and realization of pre-modeled plate are able to guarantee a more anatomically correct reduction and a decrease in operating times. These outcomes translate into a decrease in both short and long-term complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"126 1","pages":"Article 102029"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785524002921","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Jaw reconstruction after complex post-traumatic fracture is still a challenge for surgeons using traditional surgery. Virtual surgical planning has proven to be a valid tool for managing these fractures. The aim of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the VSP effectiveness compared to traditional surgery in the management of complex mandibular fractures.

Methods

30 patients with diagnosis of complex mandibular fracture were enrolled and divided in two groups: Group A (virtually planned surgery), The plate was pre-modeled and employed during the surgery; Group B (traditional surgery), the plate was shaped directly during the surgery. Virtually planned and post-operative Computer Tomography were after compared for both the groups to highlight discrepancies in mm.

Results

Fracture surgical reduction was successful without intraoperative complications. In Group A, all the mean discrepancies’ values were <1 mm while in Group B the values were included between 1.36 and 1.94 mm. The mean operative time was 69 min for Group A, while 106 min for Group B.

Conclusions

Fracture virtual reduction and realization of pre-modeled plate are able to guarantee a more anatomically correct reduction and a decrease in operating times. These outcomes translate into a decrease in both short and long-term complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤后复杂骨折后的下颌骨重建:传统手术与虚拟计划手术的对比分析。
背景:对于使用传统手术的外科医生来说,创伤后复杂骨折后的颌骨重建仍然是一项挑战。虚拟手术规划已被证明是治疗此类骨折的有效工具。本研究旨在定量评估虚拟手术规划与传统手术相比在处理复杂下颌骨骨折方面的有效性:A组(虚拟计划手术),钢板预先建模并在手术中使用;B组(传统手术),钢板在手术中直接成型。两组患者的虚拟计划手术和术后计算机断层扫描结果进行比较,以突出毫米级差异:结果:骨折手术缩小成功,无术中并发症。A 组的平均差异值均小于 1 毫米,而 B 组的差异值在 1.36 至 1.94 毫米之间。A 组的平均手术时间为 69 分钟,B 组为 106 分钟:结论:骨折虚拟还原和预制钢板的实现能够保证解剖上更正确的还原,并减少手术时间。这些结果可减少短期和长期并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the use of ChatGPT in oral and maxillofacial surgery Ameloblastoma in Chongqing children and adolescents: a review of 16 cases Design and application of Tai Chi modification of the contralateral submental flap Association of Toll-like receptors 3, 4, 9 expression with clinicopathological features in oral squamous cell carcinoma Advancing AI-driven clinical anamnesis: Insights from a comparative evaluation of large language models in oral and maxillofacial diagnosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1