Editorial Commentary: Superior Capsular Reconstruction with Achilles Allograft Can Reverse Pseudoparalysis While Improving Functional Patient Outcomes.

Alan W Reynolds, Brian R Waterman
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Superior Capsular Reconstruction with Achilles Allograft Can Reverse Pseudoparalysis While Improving Functional Patient Outcomes.","authors":"Alan W Reynolds, Brian R Waterman","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) represent a vexing problem, particularly in the physiologically young patient with no glenohumeral arthritis and high functional expectations. Not even the last line of defense, the reverse shoulder arthroplasty can help all of our patients with MIRCTs and resultant pseudoparalysis, and in younger patients, joint preservation could be a preferable first line intervention. Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) shares the joint preservation arena with an evolving multitude of options, including arthroscopic debridement, partial rotator cuff repair, biologic tuberoplasty, interposition balloon spacer, and lower trapezius tendon transfer. SCR shows promising biomechanical and clinical outcomes, including restoration of native glenohumeral biomechanics and contact pressures, achievement of humeral head depression, reduction of pain, and improved patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and range of motion (ROM), despite a high rate of graft re-tear or discontinuity. Yet, comparable results may be achieved via simpler procedures including debridement, partial repair, tuberoplasty, and/or spacer. Ultimately, the true value of SCR, or any other technique, would be proven improvement in strength or survivorship from subsequent surgery, particularly reverse arthroplasty. Optimizing indications for these constantly evolving techniques is a moving target and essential for selecting the highest value procedures for patients based on their individual needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) represent a vexing problem, particularly in the physiologically young patient with no glenohumeral arthritis and high functional expectations. Not even the last line of defense, the reverse shoulder arthroplasty can help all of our patients with MIRCTs and resultant pseudoparalysis, and in younger patients, joint preservation could be a preferable first line intervention. Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) shares the joint preservation arena with an evolving multitude of options, including arthroscopic debridement, partial rotator cuff repair, biologic tuberoplasty, interposition balloon spacer, and lower trapezius tendon transfer. SCR shows promising biomechanical and clinical outcomes, including restoration of native glenohumeral biomechanics and contact pressures, achievement of humeral head depression, reduction of pain, and improved patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and range of motion (ROM), despite a high rate of graft re-tear or discontinuity. Yet, comparable results may be achieved via simpler procedures including debridement, partial repair, tuberoplasty, and/or spacer. Ultimately, the true value of SCR, or any other technique, would be proven improvement in strength or survivorship from subsequent surgery, particularly reverse arthroplasty. Optimizing indications for these constantly evolving techniques is a moving target and essential for selecting the highest value procedures for patients based on their individual needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编辑评论:用跟腱同种异体移植进行上囊重建可逆转假性瘫痪,同时改善患者的功能预后。
无法修复的肩袖大面积撕裂(MIRCTs)是一个令人头疼的问题,尤其是对于没有盂肱关节炎且对功能期望较高的年轻生理患者而言。反向肩关节置换术甚至不是最后一道防线,它可以帮助所有患有肩袖撕裂并导致假性瘫痪的患者,而对于年轻患者来说,关节保留可能是更可取的一线干预措施。上关节囊重建术(SCR)与关节镜清创术、肩袖部分修复术、生物结节成形术、球囊间隙置入术和下斜方肌腱转移术等不断发展的多种方案共享关节保留领域。SCR显示出良好的生物力学和临床效果,包括恢复原生盂肱生物力学和接触压力、实现肱骨头凹陷、减轻疼痛、改善患者报告结果指标(PROMs)和活动范围(ROM),尽管移植物再撕裂或不连续的发生率很高。然而,通过更简单的手术,包括清创术、部分修复术、结节成形术和/或间隔器,也能达到类似的效果。最终,SCR 或任何其他技术的真正价值在于后续手术(尤其是反向关节成形术)中强度或存活率的提高。优化这些不断发展的技术的适应症是一个不断变化的目标,对于根据患者的个体需求为其选择最高价值的手术至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Commentary: Arthroscopic Bone Grafting Using Suspensory Fixation for Anterior Glenohumeral Fixation with Bone Loss May Supersede Latarjet Using Coracoid Transfer. Editorial Commentary: In Cases of Cam Over-resection and Irreparable Hip Labral Tear Requiring Revision, Acetabular Circumferential Labral Reconstruction with Larger Graft Width Is Indicated. Editorial Commentary: Repair of Radial Meniscus Tears. Editorial Commentary:Varus Recurrence After Medial Opening Wedge HTO. Introducing Foundations of Arthroscopy Techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1