High Survival Rate and Satisfaction at More Than 11-Year Follow-Up After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Impact of Preoperative Functional Scores, Osteoarthritis, and Chondrolabral Junction Damage on Failure
Filippo Randelli M.D. , Manuel Giovanni Mazzoleni M.D. , Alessandro Bezza M.D. , Andrea Di Loreto M.D. , Mohammad Mourad Elhiny M.D. , Mohamed Elshafie M.D., F.R.C.S.(Orth) , Alberto Fioruzzi M.D.
{"title":"High Survival Rate and Satisfaction at More Than 11-Year Follow-Up After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Impact of Preoperative Functional Scores, Osteoarthritis, and Chondrolabral Junction Damage on Failure","authors":"Filippo Randelli M.D. , Manuel Giovanni Mazzoleni M.D. , Alessandro Bezza M.D. , Andrea Di Loreto M.D. , Mohammad Mourad Elhiny M.D. , Mohamed Elshafie M.D., F.R.C.S.(Orth) , Alberto Fioruzzi M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate the survival and durability of clinical improvements after hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) at a minimum of 10-year follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from patients who underwent HA for FAIS between March 2003 and May 2012 were collected and retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent evaluation at a minimum 10-year follow-up, assessed according to the Hip Outcome Score (HOS)–Activities of Daily Living, HOS–Sport-Specific Subscale, and Non-arthritic Hip Score, were included. Satisfaction ratings were collected. Statistical analysis assessed within-group differences and survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study included 95 patients with an average follow-up period of 11.8 years. The mean age was 39.5 ± 11.0 years. The overall total hip replacement (THR) conversion rate was 24.2%, with a mean time of 3.4 ± 3.2 years. Hip joint preservation surgery revision was required in 3.2% of patients at a mean of 3.2 ± 3 years. The rate of survivorship at 10 years was 72.6%. The minimal clinically important difference was achieved by 28 patients for the HOS–Activities of Daily Living (73.6%), 28 patients (75.6%) for the HOS–Sport-Specific Subscale, and 33 patients (84.6%) for the Non-arthritic Hip Score. The patient acceptable symptom state was achieved by 42 patients (61.7%), 43 patients (65.1%), and 44 patients (64.7%), respectively. Comparative analysis between patients whose hip was preserved and those who underwent hip joint preservation surgery revision or THR highlighted that Tönnis grade 2 or greater, chondrolabral junction damage, and lower preoperative scores were associated with failure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>HA for FAIS showed durable results, with an acceptable THR conversion rate and sustained clinical benefits. Of the patients whose hip was preserved, 91.3% were satisfied. Tönnis grade 2 or greater, magnetic resonance arthrography signs of chondrolabral junction damage, and lower preoperative functional status are strongly associated with failure.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, therapeutic case series.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 6","pages":"Pages 1776-1785"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806324006108","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the survival and durability of clinical improvements after hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) at a minimum of 10-year follow-up.
Methods
Data from patients who underwent HA for FAIS between March 2003 and May 2012 were collected and retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent evaluation at a minimum 10-year follow-up, assessed according to the Hip Outcome Score (HOS)–Activities of Daily Living, HOS–Sport-Specific Subscale, and Non-arthritic Hip Score, were included. Satisfaction ratings were collected. Statistical analysis assessed within-group differences and survival.
Results
This study included 95 patients with an average follow-up period of 11.8 years. The mean age was 39.5 ± 11.0 years. The overall total hip replacement (THR) conversion rate was 24.2%, with a mean time of 3.4 ± 3.2 years. Hip joint preservation surgery revision was required in 3.2% of patients at a mean of 3.2 ± 3 years. The rate of survivorship at 10 years was 72.6%. The minimal clinically important difference was achieved by 28 patients for the HOS–Activities of Daily Living (73.6%), 28 patients (75.6%) for the HOS–Sport-Specific Subscale, and 33 patients (84.6%) for the Non-arthritic Hip Score. The patient acceptable symptom state was achieved by 42 patients (61.7%), 43 patients (65.1%), and 44 patients (64.7%), respectively. Comparative analysis between patients whose hip was preserved and those who underwent hip joint preservation surgery revision or THR highlighted that Tönnis grade 2 or greater, chondrolabral junction damage, and lower preoperative scores were associated with failure.
Conclusions
HA for FAIS showed durable results, with an acceptable THR conversion rate and sustained clinical benefits. Of the patients whose hip was preserved, 91.3% were satisfied. Tönnis grade 2 or greater, magnetic resonance arthrography signs of chondrolabral junction damage, and lower preoperative functional status are strongly associated with failure.
期刊介绍:
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.