Improved Acromiohumeral Distance Independently Predicts Better Outcomes After Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Graft Tears.

Hui Ben, Erica Kholinne, Jia Guo, Seung Min Ryu, Jian Loong Ling, Kyoung Hwan Koh, In-Ho Jeon
{"title":"Improved Acromiohumeral Distance Independently Predicts Better Outcomes After Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Graft Tears.","authors":"Hui Ben, Erica Kholinne, Jia Guo, Seung Min Ryu, Jian Loong Ling, Kyoung Hwan Koh, In-Ho Jeon","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify independent factors responsible for the poor outcomes after a graft tear after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent ASCR for massive rotator cuff tears between January 2013 and July 2021were reviewed. Based on the achievement of the minimal clinically important differences for clinical outcome measures at the final follow up, patients were divided into the good outcome (GO) and poor outcome (PO) groups. The minimal clinically important differences were calculated as the values equal to one-half of the standard deviation of the changes in outcome scores between the preoperative baseline and the latest follow-up. Pre- and final follow-up variables included demographics, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, range of motion, Preoperative and postoperative 1-year radiological variables were analyzed using MRIs, including anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) tear sizes, subscapularis tear, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), and degree of fatty degeneration. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the significant predictors of poor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 patients who underwent ASCR presented with graft tears, which were confirmed by postoperative 1-year magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and had a minimum follow-up duration of 2 years after surgery were enrolled. The GO group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in functional outcomes compared with the PO group (ASES: 83.5 ± 11.8 vs. 64.0 ± 20.4, P = 0.004; Constant: 67.6 ± 5.7 vs. 57.1 ± 9.8, P <0.001; and VAS: 0.9 ± 1.2 vs. 2.4 ± 2.0, P = 0.026). The postoperative 1-year AHD showed significant improvement in the GO group (3.1 ± 1.2 vs. 6.1 ± 1.4, P <0.001) but no change in the PO group (3.4 ± 1.3 vs. 4.2 ± 0.9, P = 0.074) postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that a decreased postoperative 1-year AHD (OR, 0.145; P = 0.019) was associated with a poor outcome after a graft tear.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A narrow postoperative 1-year AHD was identified as the most importantindependent risk factor indicating poor clinical outcomes after a graft tear post-ASCR, which was related to a larger tear and loss of integrity between the grafts and infraspinatus at 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To identify independent factors responsible for the poor outcomes after a graft tear after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR).

Methods: Patients who underwent ASCR for massive rotator cuff tears between January 2013 and July 2021were reviewed. Based on the achievement of the minimal clinically important differences for clinical outcome measures at the final follow up, patients were divided into the good outcome (GO) and poor outcome (PO) groups. The minimal clinically important differences were calculated as the values equal to one-half of the standard deviation of the changes in outcome scores between the preoperative baseline and the latest follow-up. Pre- and final follow-up variables included demographics, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, range of motion, Preoperative and postoperative 1-year radiological variables were analyzed using MRIs, including anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) tear sizes, subscapularis tear, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), and degree of fatty degeneration. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the significant predictors of poor outcomes.

Results: A total of 33 patients who underwent ASCR presented with graft tears, which were confirmed by postoperative 1-year magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and had a minimum follow-up duration of 2 years after surgery were enrolled. The GO group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in functional outcomes compared with the PO group (ASES: 83.5 ± 11.8 vs. 64.0 ± 20.4, P = 0.004; Constant: 67.6 ± 5.7 vs. 57.1 ± 9.8, P <0.001; and VAS: 0.9 ± 1.2 vs. 2.4 ± 2.0, P = 0.026). The postoperative 1-year AHD showed significant improvement in the GO group (3.1 ± 1.2 vs. 6.1 ± 1.4, P <0.001) but no change in the PO group (3.4 ± 1.3 vs. 4.2 ± 0.9, P = 0.074) postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that a decreased postoperative 1-year AHD (OR, 0.145; P = 0.019) was associated with a poor outcome after a graft tear.

Conclusion: A narrow postoperative 1-year AHD was identified as the most importantindependent risk factor indicating poor clinical outcomes after a graft tear post-ASCR, which was related to a larger tear and loss of integrity between the grafts and infraspinatus at 1 year postoperatively.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肱骨喙突距离的改善可独立预测关节镜下上睑囊重建移植物撕裂术后的更好疗效。
目的:确定导致关节镜上关节囊重建术(ASCR)后移植物撕裂不良后果的独立因素:回顾性分析2013年1月至2021年7月期间因肩袖大面积撕裂而接受ASCR的患者。根据最终随访时临床结局指标的最小临床重要差异,将患者分为良好结局(GO)组和不良结局(PO)组。最小临床重要差异的计算方法是,术前基线与最近一次随访之间结果评分变化的标准差的二分之一。术前和最终随访变量包括人口统计学、美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)评分、康斯坦茨评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、活动范围、术前和术后1年的放射学变量(包括前后(AP)和内外侧(ML)撕裂大小、肩胛下撕裂、肩峰肱骨距离(AHD)和脂肪变性程度)。为确定不良预后的重要预测因素,进行了逻辑回归分析:共有33名接受ASCR手术的患者出现移植物撕裂,并经术后1年磁共振成像(MRI)证实,且术后随访时间至少为2年。与 PO 组相比,GO 组的功能结果改善明显(ASES:83.5±11.8 vs. 64.0±20.4,P = 0.004;Constant:67.6±5.7 vs. 57.1±9.8,P 结论:GO 组术后 1 年的 AH 值较 PO 组窄:术后1年AHD变窄被认为是ASCR术后移植物撕裂后临床效果不佳的最重要的独立风险因素,这与术后1年移植物和冈下肌之间撕裂面积增大和完整性丧失有关:证据等级:IV 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Commentary: Arthroscopic Bone Grafting Using Suspensory Fixation for Anterior Glenohumeral Fixation with Bone Loss May Supersede Latarjet Using Coracoid Transfer. Editorial Commentary: In Cases of Cam Over-resection and Irreparable Hip Labral Tear Requiring Revision, Acetabular Circumferential Labral Reconstruction with Larger Graft Width Is Indicated. Editorial Commentary: Repair of Radial Meniscus Tears. Editorial Commentary:Varus Recurrence After Medial Opening Wedge HTO. Introducing Foundations of Arthroscopy Techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1