Patients With a History of Lumbar Fusion Have a Greater Risk of Revision Arthroscopy and Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty After Primary Hip Arthroscopy.

Abhinaba Chatterjee, Kaisen Yao, Matthew H Nasra, Thun Itthipanichpong, Gregory Galano, Anil S Ranawat
{"title":"Patients With a History of Lumbar Fusion Have a Greater Risk of Revision Arthroscopy and Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty After Primary Hip Arthroscopy.","authors":"Abhinaba Chatterjee, Kaisen Yao, Matthew H Nasra, Thun Itthipanichpong, Gregory Galano, Anil S Ranawat","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize the risk of revision hip arthroscopy or conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) among patients with a history of lumbar fusion undergoing primary hip arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System, an administrative database including all ambulatory and inpatient surgery encounters in New York, to identify all patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement between 2010 and 2020. Patients with previous lumbar fusion were identified using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, coding definitions. Patients with and without previous fusion were matched in a 1:5 ratio according to age and comorbidity burden. The number of levels fused was defined in the following fashion: (1) no fusion, (2) 1-2 levels, or (3) ≥3 levels. Patients were followed for 2 years to evaluate the rate of revision hip arthroscopy or conversion to THA. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to measure the association between number of levels fused and revision hip arthroscopy or conversion to THA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2010 and 2020, there were 23,277 patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy in New York state. Of these, 348 (1.4%) had a previous lumbar fusion. After matching for age and comorbidities, the composite rate of revision hip arthroscopy or conversion to THA was greater in patients with previous lumbar fusion compared with patients without (16.5% vs 8.5%; P < .001). This risk increased with the number of levels fused (1-2 levels: 15.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval 1.3-2.6; vs ≥3 levels: 26.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval 1.7-7.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with a history of lumbar fusion had significantly greater rates of revision hip arthroscopy and conversion to THA compared with patients without previous fusion. The risk of revision hip arthroscopy or conversion to THA was increased approximately 2-fold in patients with 1 to 2 levels fused and 3-fold in patients with 3 or more levels fused.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, prognostic retrospective matched comparative case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize the risk of revision hip arthroscopy or conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) among patients with a history of lumbar fusion undergoing primary hip arthroscopy.

Methods: We used the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System, an administrative database including all ambulatory and inpatient surgery encounters in New York, to identify all patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement between 2010 and 2020. Patients with previous lumbar fusion were identified using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, coding definitions. Patients with and without previous fusion were matched in a 1:5 ratio according to age and comorbidity burden. The number of levels fused was defined in the following fashion: (1) no fusion, (2) 1-2 levels, or (3) ≥3 levels. Patients were followed for 2 years to evaluate the rate of revision hip arthroscopy or conversion to THA. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to measure the association between number of levels fused and revision hip arthroscopy or conversion to THA.

Results: Between 2010 and 2020, there were 23,277 patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy in New York state. Of these, 348 (1.4%) had a previous lumbar fusion. After matching for age and comorbidities, the composite rate of revision hip arthroscopy or conversion to THA was greater in patients with previous lumbar fusion compared with patients without (16.5% vs 8.5%; P < .001). This risk increased with the number of levels fused (1-2 levels: 15.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval 1.3-2.6; vs ≥3 levels: 26.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval 1.7-7.0).

Conclusions: Patients with a history of lumbar fusion had significantly greater rates of revision hip arthroscopy and conversion to THA compared with patients without previous fusion. The risk of revision hip arthroscopy or conversion to THA was increased approximately 2-fold in patients with 1 to 2 levels fused and 3-fold in patients with 3 or more levels fused.

Level of evidence: Level III, prognostic retrospective matched comparative case series.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有腰椎融合术病史的患者在初次髋关节镜手术后进行关节镜翻修和转为全髋关节置换术的风险较高。
目的:分析有腰椎融合史的患者接受初次髋关节镜手术后进行髋关节镜翻修或转为全髋关节置换术(THA)的风险:我们利用全州规划与研究合作系统(Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System)这一包括纽约州(NY)所有门诊和住院手术病例的行政数据库,确定了 2010-2020 年间因 FAI 接受髋关节镜手术的所有患者。使用 CPT 和 ICD 第 9/10 次修订版编码定义确定了既往接受过腰椎融合术的患者。根据年龄和合并症负担,将既往接受过腰椎融合术和未接受过腰椎融合术的患者按 1:5 的比例进行配对。融合的水平数定义如下:i) 无融合,ii) 1-2 水平,或 iii) ≥3 水平。对患者进行为期两年的随访,以评估髋关节镜翻修率或转为 THA 的比率。多变量逻辑回归模型用于测量融合水平数与髋关节镜翻修或转为THA之间的关系:2010-2020年间,纽约州共有23277名患者接受了初次髋关节镜手术。其中,348人(1.4%)曾接受过腰椎融合术。在对年龄和合并症进行匹配后,既往接受过腰椎融合术的患者与未接受过腰椎融合术的患者相比,髋关节镜翻修或转为 THA 的复合率更高(16.5% 对 8.5%;P < 0.001)。这一风险随融合的水平数增加而增加(1-2个水平:15.1%;aOR,1.8;95% CI,1.3-2.6;与≥3个水平相比:26.3%;aOR,3.4;95% CI,1.7-7.0):结论:与无腰椎融合术史的患者相比,有腰椎融合术史的患者接受髋关节镜翻修手术和转为 THA 的比例明显更高。髋关节镜翻修或转为THA的风险在1-2级融合的患者中增加了约2倍,在3级或3级以上融合的患者中增加了3倍:III级,预后回顾性匹配比较病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Author Reply to Editorial Comment "Autologous Minced Repair of Knee Cartilage Is Safely and Effectively Performed Using Arthroscopic Techniques". Culture Expansion Alters Human Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Production of Osteoarthritis-relevant Cytokines and Growth Factors. Steeper Slope of the Medial Tibial Plateau, Greater Varus Alignment, and Narrower Intercondylar Distance and Notch Width Increase Risk for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review. Synthetic Medial Meniscus Implant Demonstrates High Reoperation Rates: Patients Who Retain Implant or Require Implant Exchange SHow Improvement For Post Meniscectomy Knee Pain Is Associated With Clinical Improvement But High Reoperation Rates At 2-Years Post-Operatively. The Knee Anterolateral Ligament is Present in 82% of North American and 65% of European But Only in 46% of Asian Studies: A Systematic Review of Frequency and Anatomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1