Which adults aged 65 and older are at low-risk for cervical spine injuries after low-level falls?

IF 2.4 CJEM Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1007/s43678-024-00752-x
Jessica McCallum, Debra Eagles, Ian Stiell, Monica Taljaard, Christian Vaillancourt, Mathew Mercuri, Natasha Clayton, Éric Mercier, Judy Morris, Rebecca Jeanmonod, Catherine Varner, David Barbic, Ian M Buchanan, Mariyam Ali, Yoan K Kagoma, Ashkan Shoamanesh, Paul Engels, Sunjay Sharma, Andrew Worster, Shelley L McLeod, Marcel Émond, Alexandra Papaioannou, Sameer Parpia, Kerstin de Wit
{"title":"Which adults aged 65 and older are at low-risk for cervical spine injuries after low-level falls?","authors":"Jessica McCallum, Debra Eagles, Ian Stiell, Monica Taljaard, Christian Vaillancourt, Mathew Mercuri, Natasha Clayton, Éric Mercier, Judy Morris, Rebecca Jeanmonod, Catherine Varner, David Barbic, Ian M Buchanan, Mariyam Ali, Yoan K Kagoma, Ashkan Shoamanesh, Paul Engels, Sunjay Sharma, Andrew Worster, Shelley L McLeod, Marcel Émond, Alexandra Papaioannou, Sameer Parpia, Kerstin de Wit","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00752-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The population is aging and falls are a common reason for emergency department visits. Appropriate imaging in this population is important. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of cervical spine injury and identify factors associated with cervical spine injuries in adults ≥ 65 years after low-level falls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a pre-specified sub-study of a prospective observational cohort study of intracranial bleeding in emergency patients ≥ 65 years presenting after low-level falls. The primary outcome was cervical spine injury. The risk factors of interest were Glasgow coma scale (GCS) < 15, head injury, neck pain, age, and frailty defined as Clinical Frailty Scale ≥ 5. Multivariable logistic regression was used to measure the strength of association between risk factors and cervical spine injury. A descriptive analysis of absence of significant risk factors was performed to determine patients who may not require imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 4308 adults ≥ 65 who sustained low-level falls with mean age of 82.0 (standard deviation ± 8.8) years and 1538 (35.7%) were male; 23 [0.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.8%)] were diagnosed with cervical spine injuries. The adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs were 1.3 (0.5-3.2) for GCS < 15, 5.3 (1.7-26.7) for head injury, 13.0 (5.7-31.2) for new neck pain, 1.4 (1.0-1.8) for 5-year increase in age, and 1.1 (0.4-2.9) for frailty. Head injury or neck pain identified all 23 cervical spine injuries. Management was a rigid collar in 19/23 (82.6%) patients and none had surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In emergency patients ≥ 65 years presenting after a low-level fall, head injury, neck pain, and older age were associated with the diagnosis of cervical spine injury. There were no cervical spine injuries in those without head injury or neck pain. Patients with no head injury or neck pain may not require cervical spine imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"721-726"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00752-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The population is aging and falls are a common reason for emergency department visits. Appropriate imaging in this population is important. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of cervical spine injury and identify factors associated with cervical spine injuries in adults ≥ 65 years after low-level falls.

Methods: This was a pre-specified sub-study of a prospective observational cohort study of intracranial bleeding in emergency patients ≥ 65 years presenting after low-level falls. The primary outcome was cervical spine injury. The risk factors of interest were Glasgow coma scale (GCS) < 15, head injury, neck pain, age, and frailty defined as Clinical Frailty Scale ≥ 5. Multivariable logistic regression was used to measure the strength of association between risk factors and cervical spine injury. A descriptive analysis of absence of significant risk factors was performed to determine patients who may not require imaging.

Results: There were 4308 adults ≥ 65 who sustained low-level falls with mean age of 82.0 (standard deviation ± 8.8) years and 1538 (35.7%) were male; 23 [0.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.8%)] were diagnosed with cervical spine injuries. The adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs were 1.3 (0.5-3.2) for GCS < 15, 5.3 (1.7-26.7) for head injury, 13.0 (5.7-31.2) for new neck pain, 1.4 (1.0-1.8) for 5-year increase in age, and 1.1 (0.4-2.9) for frailty. Head injury or neck pain identified all 23 cervical spine injuries. Management was a rigid collar in 19/23 (82.6%) patients and none had surgery.

Conclusions: In emergency patients ≥ 65 years presenting after a low-level fall, head injury, neck pain, and older age were associated with the diagnosis of cervical spine injury. There were no cervical spine injuries in those without head injury or neck pain. Patients with no head injury or neck pain may not require cervical spine imaging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪些 65 岁及以上的成年人在低水平跌倒后颈椎受伤的风险较低?
目标:人口老龄化加剧,跌倒是急诊就诊的常见原因。对这一人群进行适当的影像学检查非常重要。本研究的目的是估计颈椎损伤的发生率,并确定与颈椎损伤相关的因素:这是一项前瞻性观察性队列研究的一项预先指定的子研究,研究对象是低水平跌倒后出现颅内出血的年龄≥65岁的急诊患者。主要结果是颈椎损伤。风险因素为格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS):4308 名年龄≥65 岁的低位跌倒成人的平均年龄为 82.0 岁(标准差 ± 8.8),其中男性 1538 人(35.7%);23 人[0.5%(95% 置信区间(CI)0.3-0.8%)]被诊断为颈椎损伤。GCS 结论的调整赔率比和 95% 置信区间为 1.3 (0.5-3.2):在低水平跌倒后急诊就诊的年龄≥ 65 岁的患者中,头部受伤、颈部疼痛和年龄较大与颈椎损伤的诊断有关。没有头部损伤或颈部疼痛的患者没有颈椎损伤。没有头部损伤或颈部疼痛的患者可能不需要进行颈椎成像检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Machine learning outperforms the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in predicting need for early critical care. The role of partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in pre-hospital trauma. Just the facts: evaluation and management of epistaxis. Safety and accuracy of the computer interpretation of normal ECGs at triage. Correction: Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of rapid HIV testing in Canadian Emergency Departments: a mixed methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1