Digital workflow for graft harvest and positioning in deficient anterior mandibles versus conventional technique: Randomized controlled trial.

Mohamed Ibrahim Sakr, Mahmoud Hanafy, Amr Gibaly, Mohamed Mounir
{"title":"Digital workflow for graft harvest and positioning in deficient anterior mandibles versus conventional technique: Randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Mohamed Ibrahim Sakr, Mahmoud Hanafy, Amr Gibaly, Mohamed Mounir","doi":"10.1111/cid.13382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The cortical shell technique is frequently associated with technical drawbacks, such as the lack of anatomical guidance during shell harvest and graft. This study aims to assess the horizontal bone gain and accuracy of a digitalized protocol that incorporates two interlocking patient-specific stackable guides (PSSGs) to control the shell harvest, positioning, and fixation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Twenty patients with deficient anterior mandibles were randomly allocated; 10 patients received freehand symphyseal shell harvest and fixation (the control group), whereas the other 10 received fully guided harvest and graft (study group) using (PSSGs), the first aided an accurate shell harvest, whereas the second conveyed shell fixation. The interposition gap among both groups was loaded with an equal mix of xenogeneic and autogenous particulates. The mean radiographic bone gain among both groups was calibrated 6 months postoperatively, and the accuracy of the digital plan was assessed by superimposing and comparing the virtually planned horizontal bone dimensions with the immediate postoperative actual bone dimensions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean 6-month postoperative horizontal bone gain value of the study group was recorded as (4.97 ± 0.73) mm versus (4.45 ± 0.61) mm for the control group, with a statistically insignificant mean gain difference of (0.52) mm, (p = 0.101). The mean virtual preplanned horizontal bone gain was recorded (5.4 ± 0.6) versus (5.4 ± 0.6) for the immediate postoperative actual bone gain, which was also statistically insignificant (p = 0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The (PSSGs) provided a precise method for graft harvest, position, and fixation, resulting in satisfactory alveolar ridge dimensions with intimate accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93944,"journal":{"name":"Clinical implant dentistry and related research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical implant dentistry and related research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The cortical shell technique is frequently associated with technical drawbacks, such as the lack of anatomical guidance during shell harvest and graft. This study aims to assess the horizontal bone gain and accuracy of a digitalized protocol that incorporates two interlocking patient-specific stackable guides (PSSGs) to control the shell harvest, positioning, and fixation.

Patients and methods: Twenty patients with deficient anterior mandibles were randomly allocated; 10 patients received freehand symphyseal shell harvest and fixation (the control group), whereas the other 10 received fully guided harvest and graft (study group) using (PSSGs), the first aided an accurate shell harvest, whereas the second conveyed shell fixation. The interposition gap among both groups was loaded with an equal mix of xenogeneic and autogenous particulates. The mean radiographic bone gain among both groups was calibrated 6 months postoperatively, and the accuracy of the digital plan was assessed by superimposing and comparing the virtually planned horizontal bone dimensions with the immediate postoperative actual bone dimensions.

Results: The mean 6-month postoperative horizontal bone gain value of the study group was recorded as (4.97 ± 0.73) mm versus (4.45 ± 0.61) mm for the control group, with a statistically insignificant mean gain difference of (0.52) mm, (p = 0.101). The mean virtual preplanned horizontal bone gain was recorded (5.4 ± 0.6) versus (5.4 ± 0.6) for the immediate postoperative actual bone gain, which was also statistically insignificant (p = 0.9).

Conclusion: The (PSSGs) provided a precise method for graft harvest, position, and fixation, resulting in satisfactory alveolar ridge dimensions with intimate accuracy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下颌骨前部缺损的移植物采集和定位数字化工作流程与传统技术对比:随机对照试验。
背景:皮质骨壳技术经常存在技术缺陷,例如在骨壳采集和移植过程中缺乏解剖学指导。本研究旨在评估一种数字化方案的水平骨增量和准确性,该方案结合了两个互锁的患者特异性可堆叠导板(PSSG)来控制骨壳的采集、定位和固定:随机分配了20名下颌骨前部缺损的患者,其中10名患者接受了徒手骨骺壳摘取和固定(对照组),而另外10名患者则接受了完全引导下的骨骺壳摘取和移植(研究组)。两组间的间隙都装入了等量的异种和自种颗粒。术后 6 个月对两组患者的平均骨增量进行了校准,并通过叠加和比较虚拟规划的水平骨尺寸与术后即刻的实际骨尺寸来评估数字化计划的准确性:研究组术后 6 个月的平均水平骨增量值为(4.97 ± 0.73)毫米,对照组为(4.45 ± 0.61)毫米,平均增量差为(0.52)毫米,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.101)。虚拟预规划水平骨增量的平均值为(5.4 ± 0.6),而术后即刻实际骨增量为(5.4 ± 0.6),两者在统计学上差异也不显著(p = 0.9):结论:(PSSGs)为移植物的采集、定位和固定提供了一种精确的方法,可精确地获得令人满意的牙槽嵴尺寸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical and Radiographic Features of Peri-Implant Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Retrospective Study. Evaluation of Internal and External Hexagon Connections in Immediately Loaded Full-Arch Rehabilitations: A Multicenter Randomized Split-Mouth Controlled Trial With a 6-Year Follow-Up. Metal-Free Custom-Made Zirconia Implants-A Prospective 5-Year Follow-Up Single-Arm Clinical Trial. The Effect of Implantoplasty on Fracture Resistance and Implant Surface Changes: An In Vitro and Finite Element Analysis Study. Osteoinductively Functionalized 3D-Printed Scaffold for Vertical Bone Augmentation in Beagle Dogs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1