Accessibility of diabetes education in the United States: barriers, policy implications, and the road ahead.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2024-08-21 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae097
Anna Tharakan, Eugenia McPeek Hinz, Emelia Zhu, Brad Denmeade, Jashalynn German, Wei Angel Huang, Amanda Brucker, Joanne Rinker, Chris Memering, Susan Spratt
{"title":"Accessibility of diabetes education in the United States: barriers, policy implications, and the road ahead.","authors":"Anna Tharakan, Eugenia McPeek Hinz, Emelia Zhu, Brad Denmeade, Jashalynn German, Wei Angel Huang, Amanda Brucker, Joanne Rinker, Chris Memering, Susan Spratt","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) programs are an effective, yet underutilized, resource to improve health outcomes and behaviors for people with diabetes. We examined the attendance and referral rates for people with diabetes to DSMES classes at an academic medical center, noting a 10% referral rate and 37% completion rate for those referred. We identified barriers to DSMES care at patient, provider, and health system levels. Current technology platforms and training fail to prioritize referrals to diabetes education; providers and people with diabetes are often unfamiliar with program content and benefits. Scheduling mechanisms often delay or lose interested patients in receiving vital education. Existing Medicare reimbursement strategies limit expansion of DSMES programs, generating significant wait times and limit capabilities for Diabetes Care and Education Specialists. We identify potential policy solutions and recommend alterations to existing referral and scheduling systems to expand existing technology platforms for DSMES programs and shift reimbursement policies to individualize and better support care for persons with diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"2 8","pages":"qxae097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11350287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) programs are an effective, yet underutilized, resource to improve health outcomes and behaviors for people with diabetes. We examined the attendance and referral rates for people with diabetes to DSMES classes at an academic medical center, noting a 10% referral rate and 37% completion rate for those referred. We identified barriers to DSMES care at patient, provider, and health system levels. Current technology platforms and training fail to prioritize referrals to diabetes education; providers and people with diabetes are often unfamiliar with program content and benefits. Scheduling mechanisms often delay or lose interested patients in receiving vital education. Existing Medicare reimbursement strategies limit expansion of DSMES programs, generating significant wait times and limit capabilities for Diabetes Care and Education Specialists. We identify potential policy solutions and recommend alterations to existing referral and scheduling systems to expand existing technology platforms for DSMES programs and shift reimbursement policies to individualize and better support care for persons with diabetes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国糖尿病教育的可及性:障碍、政策影响和未来之路。
糖尿病自我管理教育和支持(DSMES)计划是一种有效但未得到充分利用的资源,可改善糖尿病患者的健康状况和行为。我们对一家学术医疗中心的糖尿病患者参加 DSMES 课程的人数和转介率进行了调查,发现转介率为 10%,转介者的完成率为 37%。我们发现了患者、医疗服务提供者和医疗系统在 DSMES 护理方面存在的障碍。当前的技术平台和培训未能优先考虑糖尿病教育转介;医疗服务提供者和糖尿病患者往往不熟悉项目内容和益处。日程安排机制经常会延误或失去有兴趣接受重要教育的患者。现有的医疗保险报销策略限制了 DSMES 项目的扩展,导致大量等待时间,并限制了糖尿病护理和教育专家的能力。我们确定了潜在的政策解决方案,并建议改变现有的转诊和排期系统,以扩展 DSMES 计划的现有技术平台,并改变报销政策,使糖尿病患者的护理个性化并得到更好的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: No Surprises Act independent dispute resolution outcomes for emergency services. All-cause nursing home mortality rates have remained above pre-pandemic levels after accounting for decline in occupancy. Charting new territory: the early lessons in integrating social determinant of health (SDOH) measures into practice. Measuring hospital inpatient Procedure Access Inequality in the United States. Examining the use of telehealth to initiate buprenorphine for opioid use disorder treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1