Application of a machine learning model for early prediction of in-hospital cardiac arrests: Retrospective observational cohort study.

L Socias Crespí, L Gutiérrez Madroñal, M Fiorella Sarubbo, M Borges-Sa, A Serrano García, D López Ramos, C Pruenza Garcia-Hinojosa, E Martin Garijo
{"title":"Application of a machine learning model for early prediction of in-hospital cardiac arrests: Retrospective observational cohort study.","authors":"L Socias Crespí, L Gutiérrez Madroñal, M Fiorella Sarubbo, M Borges-Sa, A Serrano García, D López Ramos, C Pruenza Garcia-Hinojosa, E Martin Garijo","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the results of the application of a Machine Learning (ML) model to predict in-hospital cardiac arrests (ICA) 24 hours in advance in the hospital wards.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospital Wards.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Data were extracted from the hospital's Electronic Health Record (EHR). The resulting database contained a total of 750 records corresponding to 620 different patients (370 patients with ICA and 250 control), between may 2009 and december 2021.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>No.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>As predictors of ICA, a set of 28 variables including personal history, vital signs and laboratory data was employed.</p><p><strong>Models: </strong>For the early prediction of ICA, predictive models based on the following ML algorithms and using the mentioned variables, were developed and compared: K Nearest Neighbours, Support Vector Machine, Multilayer Perceptron, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting and Custom Ensemble of Gradient Boosting estimators (CEGB).</p><p><strong>Experiments: </strong>Model training and evaluation was carried out using cross validation. Among metrics of performance, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity and AUC were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best performance was provided by the CEGB model, which obtained an AUC = 0.90, a specificity = 0.84 and a sensitivity = 0.81. The main variables with influence to predict ICA were level of consciousness, haemoglobin, glucose, urea, blood pressure, heart rate, creatinine, age and hypertension, among others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of ML models could be of great support in the early detection of ICA, as the case of the CEGB model endorsed, which enabled good predictions of ICA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2024.07.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the results of the application of a Machine Learning (ML) model to predict in-hospital cardiac arrests (ICA) 24 hours in advance in the hospital wards.

Design: Retrospective observational cohort study.

Setting: Hospital Wards.

Patients: Data were extracted from the hospital's Electronic Health Record (EHR). The resulting database contained a total of 750 records corresponding to 620 different patients (370 patients with ICA and 250 control), between may 2009 and december 2021.

Interventions: No.

Main variables of interest: As predictors of ICA, a set of 28 variables including personal history, vital signs and laboratory data was employed.

Models: For the early prediction of ICA, predictive models based on the following ML algorithms and using the mentioned variables, were developed and compared: K Nearest Neighbours, Support Vector Machine, Multilayer Perceptron, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting and Custom Ensemble of Gradient Boosting estimators (CEGB).

Experiments: Model training and evaluation was carried out using cross validation. Among metrics of performance, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity and AUC were estimated.

Results: The best performance was provided by the CEGB model, which obtained an AUC = 0.90, a specificity = 0.84 and a sensitivity = 0.81. The main variables with influence to predict ICA were level of consciousness, haemoglobin, glucose, urea, blood pressure, heart rate, creatinine, age and hypertension, among others.

Conclusions: The use of ML models could be of great support in the early detection of ICA, as the case of the CEGB model endorsed, which enabled good predictions of ICA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用机器学习模型对院内心脏骤停进行早期预测:回顾性观察队列研究。
目的:描述应用机器学习(ML)模型预测院内心脏骤停(ICA)的结果:描述应用机器学习(ML)模型提前 24 小时预测医院病房内心脏骤停(ICA)的结果:设计:回顾性观察队列研究:环境:医院病房:数据来自医院的电子健康记录(EHR)。由此产生的数据库包含 2009 年 5 月至 2021 年 12 月期间 620 名不同患者(370 名 ICA 患者和 250 名对照组患者)的 750 条记录:无:主要研究变量:采用一组包括个人病史、生命体征和实验室数据在内的 28 个变量作为 ICA 的预测因子:模型:为早期预测 ICA,基于以下 ML 算法并使用上述变量开发了预测模型,并进行了比较:K 近邻、支持向量机、多层感知器、随机森林、梯度提升和梯度提升估计器自定义组合(CEGB):实验:采用交叉验证法进行模型训练和评估。在性能指标中,对准确率、特异性、灵敏度和 AUC 进行了估算:结果:CEGB 模型的性能最佳,其 AUC = 0.90,特异性 = 0.84,灵敏度 = 0.81。对预测 ICA 有影响的主要变量是意识水平、血红蛋白、葡萄糖、尿素、血压、心率、肌酐、年龄和高血压等:正如 CEGB 模型所认可的那样,使用 ML 模型对早期发现 ICA 有很大帮助,它能很好地预测 ICA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correlation and concordance of HACOR and IROX scales in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who received non-invasive ventilation in two intensive care units. From geometric equations to dynamic strategies: advances in the personalization of mechanical ventilation through mechanical power. High flow in tracheostomized patients on their first attempt to wean from mechanical ventilation: More questions on the table. Shocked and moved. Early mobilisation in cardiogenic shock. Early mobilisation in patients with shock and receiving vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1