Lymph node metastasis in grossly apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: A retrospective clinical study at a tertiary institute.

Menghan Zhu, Jun Li, Lijuan Lu, Jie Duan, Wei Jiang
{"title":"Lymph node metastasis in grossly apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: A retrospective clinical study at a tertiary institute.","authors":"Menghan Zhu, Jun Li, Lijuan Lu, Jie Duan, Wei Jiang","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2489_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and predict the risk factors of lymph node (LN) metastasis among patients with grossly apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathologic data and follow-up information of 266 patients who underwent LN dissection for apparent early-stage EOC between January 2018 and September 2022 at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 266 patients, 44 (16.5%) showed LN metastasis, of which 65.9% and 59.1% presented in the pelvic region and para-aortic region, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed higher LN positivity in patients with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), preoperative imaging suggestive of LN metastasis, bilateral adnexal involvement, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), positive peritoneal cytology, and clinical stage IIA. LN metastases were identified in 7.9%, 10.2%, and 39.7% of clinical stage IA/B, IC, and IIA disease cases, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed significantly higher LN positivity rates in patients with HGSC, LVSI, and clinical stage IIA. In clinical stage IIA EOC, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 65.8% and 77.4% (P = 0.360) for LN-negative and LN-positive groups, respectively. In clinical stage I EOC, the 3-year PFS rates were 93.5% and 59.4% (P < 0.001) for LN-negative and LN-positive groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-grade serous histology, LVSI, and clinical stage IIA disease are predictive factors for LN involvement in early-stage EOC. In addition, LN metastasis appears to be associated with worse PFS in clinical stage I EOC compared with clinical stage IIA EOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"20 4","pages":"1300-1305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2489_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and predict the risk factors of lymph node (LN) metastasis among patients with grossly apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathologic data and follow-up information of 266 patients who underwent LN dissection for apparent early-stage EOC between January 2018 and September 2022 at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University.

Results: Among 266 patients, 44 (16.5%) showed LN metastasis, of which 65.9% and 59.1% presented in the pelvic region and para-aortic region, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed higher LN positivity in patients with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), preoperative imaging suggestive of LN metastasis, bilateral adnexal involvement, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), positive peritoneal cytology, and clinical stage IIA. LN metastases were identified in 7.9%, 10.2%, and 39.7% of clinical stage IA/B, IC, and IIA disease cases, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed significantly higher LN positivity rates in patients with HGSC, LVSI, and clinical stage IIA. In clinical stage IIA EOC, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 65.8% and 77.4% (P = 0.360) for LN-negative and LN-positive groups, respectively. In clinical stage I EOC, the 3-year PFS rates were 93.5% and 59.4% (P < 0.001) for LN-negative and LN-positive groups, respectively.

Conclusions: High-grade serous histology, LVSI, and clinical stage IIA disease are predictive factors for LN involvement in early-stage EOC. In addition, LN metastasis appears to be associated with worse PFS in clinical stage I EOC compared with clinical stage IIA EOC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期上皮性卵巢癌的淋巴结转移:一家三级医院的回顾性临床研究。
研究目的本研究旨在评估粗表早期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者淋巴结(LN)转移的发生率并预测其风险因素:我们回顾性回顾了复旦大学附属妇产科医院2018年1月至2022年9月期间266例因明显早期EOC接受LN清扫术的患者的临床病理资料和随访信息:在266例患者中,44例(16.5%)出现LN转移,其中65.9%和59.1%分别出现在盆腔区域和主动脉旁区域。单变量分析显示,高级别浆液性癌(HGSC)、术前成像提示LN转移、双侧附件受累、淋巴管间隙侵犯(LVSI)、腹膜细胞学阳性和临床分期为IIA的患者LN阳性率较高。在临床分期为 IA/B、IC 和 IIA 的病例中,分别有 7.9%、10.2% 和 39.7% 发现了 LN 转移。多变量分析证实,HGSC、LVSI 和临床 IIA 期患者的 LN 阳性率明显更高。在临床 IIA 期 EOC 中,LN 阴性组和 LN 阳性组的 3 年无进展生存率(PFS)分别为 65.8%和 77.4%(P = 0.360)。在临床I期EOC中,LN阴性组和LN阳性组的3年无进展生存率分别为93.5%和59.4%(P<0.001):结论:高级别浆液性组织学、LVSI 和临床 IIA 期疾病是早期 EOC LN 受累的预测因素。此外,与临床 IIA 期 EOC 相比,LN 转移似乎与临床 I 期 EOC 较差的 PFS 相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microwave Ablation after VATS in Patients with Multiple Pulmonary Nodules. Adenoid basal carcinoma cervix - A rare epithelial neoplasm. An aggressive Cushing's syndrome originating from a rare thymic neuroendocrine tumor, controlled successfully with fluconazole and octreotide therapy before surgery. Analysis of the gamma index using an indigenously developed anthropomorphic heterogeneous female pelvis (AHFP) phantom. First clinical experience of total body irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy technique in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1