Identifying priority challenges of older adults with COPD: A multiphase intervention refinement study.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19158
Anand S Iyer, Rachel D Wells, Avery C Bechthold, Margaret Armstrong, Ronan O'Beirne, Jun Y Byun, Jazmine Coffee-Dunning, J Nicholas Odom, Russell G Buhr, Angela O Suen, Ashwin A Kotwal, Leah J Witt, Cynthia J Brown, Mark T Dransfield, Marie A Bakitas
{"title":"Identifying priority challenges of older adults with COPD: A multiphase intervention refinement study.","authors":"Anand S Iyer, Rachel D Wells, Avery C Bechthold, Margaret Armstrong, Ronan O'Beirne, Jun Y Byun, Jazmine Coffee-Dunning, J Nicholas Odom, Russell G Buhr, Angela O Suen, Ashwin A Kotwal, Leah J Witt, Cynthia J Brown, Mark T Dransfield, Marie A Bakitas","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying priority challenges of older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is critical to designing interventions aimed at improving their well-being and independence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To prioritize challenges of older adults with COPD and those who care for them to guide refinement of a telephonic nurse coach intervention for patients with COPD and their family caregivers (EPIC: Empowering People to Independence in COPD).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multiphase study guided by Baltes Theory of Successful Aging and the 5Ms Framework: Phase 1: Nominal group technique (NGT), a structured process of prioritizing responses to a question through group consensus. Phase 2: Rapid qualitative analysis. Phase 3: Intervention mapping and refinement.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ambulatory, virtual.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Older adults with COPD, family caregivers, clinic staff (nurses, respiratory therapists), clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners), and health system leaders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NGT sessions were conducted by constituency group with 37 participants (n = 7 patients, n = 6 family caregivers, n = 8 clinic staff, n = 9 clinicians, n = 7 health system leaders) (Phase 1). Participants generated 92 statements across five themes (Phase 2): (1) \"Barriers to care\", (2) \"Family caregiver needs\", (3) \"Functional status and mobility issues\", (4) \"Illness understanding\", and (5) \"COPD care complexities\". Supplemental oxygen challenges emerged as a critical problem, and prioritized challenges differed by group. Patients and clinic staff prioritized \"Functional status and mobility issues\", family caregivers prioritized \"Family caregiver needs\", and clinicians and health system leaders prioritized \"COPD care complexities\". Intervention mapping (Phase 3) guided EPIC refinement focused on meeting patient priorities of independence and mobility but accounting for all priorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diverse constituency groups identified priority challenges for older adults with COPD. Functional status and mobility issues, particularly related to supplemental oxygen, emerged as patient prioritized challenges.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Patient-centered interventions for older adults with COPD must account for their prioritized functional and supplemental oxygen needs and explore diverse constituent perspectives to facilitate intervention enrichment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying priority challenges of older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is critical to designing interventions aimed at improving their well-being and independence.

Objective: To prioritize challenges of older adults with COPD and those who care for them to guide refinement of a telephonic nurse coach intervention for patients with COPD and their family caregivers (EPIC: Empowering People to Independence in COPD).

Design: Multiphase study guided by Baltes Theory of Successful Aging and the 5Ms Framework: Phase 1: Nominal group technique (NGT), a structured process of prioritizing responses to a question through group consensus. Phase 2: Rapid qualitative analysis. Phase 3: Intervention mapping and refinement.

Setting: Ambulatory, virtual.

Participants: Older adults with COPD, family caregivers, clinic staff (nurses, respiratory therapists), clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners), and health system leaders.

Results: NGT sessions were conducted by constituency group with 37 participants (n = 7 patients, n = 6 family caregivers, n = 8 clinic staff, n = 9 clinicians, n = 7 health system leaders) (Phase 1). Participants generated 92 statements across five themes (Phase 2): (1) "Barriers to care", (2) "Family caregiver needs", (3) "Functional status and mobility issues", (4) "Illness understanding", and (5) "COPD care complexities". Supplemental oxygen challenges emerged as a critical problem, and prioritized challenges differed by group. Patients and clinic staff prioritized "Functional status and mobility issues", family caregivers prioritized "Family caregiver needs", and clinicians and health system leaders prioritized "COPD care complexities". Intervention mapping (Phase 3) guided EPIC refinement focused on meeting patient priorities of independence and mobility but accounting for all priorities.

Conclusions: Diverse constituency groups identified priority challenges for older adults with COPD. Functional status and mobility issues, particularly related to supplemental oxygen, emerged as patient prioritized challenges.

Implications: Patient-centered interventions for older adults with COPD must account for their prioritized functional and supplemental oxygen needs and explore diverse constituent perspectives to facilitate intervention enrichment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别患有慢性阻塞性肺病的老年人面临的首要挑战:多阶段干预改进研究。
背景:确定患有慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的老年人面临的主要挑战,对于设计旨在改善其福祉和独立性的干预措施至关重要:确定慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)老年人及其护理者所面临挑战的优先次序,以指导完善针对慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者及其家庭护理者的电话护士指导干预措施(EPIC:增强慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者的独立性):设计:以 Baltes 成功老龄化理论和 5Ms 框架为指导的多阶段研究:第 1 阶段:名义小组技术(NGT),这是一种通过小组共识对问题的回答进行优先排序的结构化过程。第 2 阶段:快速定性分析。第 3 阶段:制定和完善干预措施:流动、虚拟:参与者:患有慢性阻塞性肺病的老年人、家庭护理人员、诊所工作人员(护士、呼吸治疗师)、临床医生(内科医生、执业护士)和医疗系统领导:37 名参与者(患者 7 人、家庭护理人员 6 人、诊所员工 8 人、临床医生 9 人、医疗系统领导 7 人)参加了按选区分组进行的 NGT 会议(第 1 阶段)。参与者提出了 92 项声明,涉及五个主题(第 2 阶段):(1) "护理障碍",(2) "家庭照顾者的需求",(3) "功能状态和行动问题",(4) "对疾病的理解",以及 (5) "COPD 护理的复杂性"。补充氧气方面的挑战是一个关键问题,不同组别优先考虑的挑战有所不同。患者和诊所工作人员优先考虑 "功能状态和行动问题",家庭护理人员优先考虑 "家庭护理人员需求",而临床医生和医疗系统领导则优先考虑 "慢性阻塞性肺病护理的复杂性"。干预规划(第 3 阶段)指导 EPIC 的改进,重点是满足患者在独立性和行动能力方面的优先需求,但也考虑到所有优先需求:不同的支持群体确定了患有慢性阻塞性肺病的老年人所面临的主要挑战。功能状态和行动能力问题,尤其是与补充氧气有关的问题,成为患者优先考虑的挑战:对患有慢性阻塞性肺病的老年人采取以患者为中心的干预措施时,必须考虑到他们优先考虑的功能和补氧需求,并探索不同群体的观点,以促进干预措施的丰富化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
The art of aging gracefully. Factors associated with language concordant cognitive testing among linguistically diverse older adults. Denosumab for osteoporosis in older adults in long-term care: A randomized trial. Change in frailty among older COVID-19 survivors. Stress tests and biomarkers of resilience: Proceedings of the second state of resilience science conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1