Racial and ethnic differences in unmet needs among older adults receiving publicly-funded home and community-based services.

Chanee D Fabius, Romil Parikh, Jack M Wolf, Stephanie Giordano, Shekinah Fashaw-Walters, Eric Jutkowitz, Tetyana Shippee
{"title":"Racial and ethnic differences in unmet needs among older adults receiving publicly-funded home and community-based services.","authors":"Chanee D Fabius, Romil Parikh, Jack M Wolf, Stephanie Giordano, Shekinah Fashaw-Walters, Eric Jutkowitz, Tetyana Shippee","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unmet need for home and community-based services (HCBS) may disparately impact older adults from racial and ethnic minoritized groups. We examined racial and ethnic differences in unmet need for HCBS among consumers ≥65 years using publicly funded HCBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the National Core Indicators-Aging and Disability survey data (2015-2019) from 21,739 community-dwelling HCBS consumers aged ≥65 years in 23 participating states. Outcome measures included self-reported unmet need in six service types (i.e., personal care, homemaker/chore, delivered meals, adult day services, transportation, and caregiver support). Racial and ethnic groups included non-Hispanic Black, Asian, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, and multiracial groups. Logistic regression models examined associations between race and ethnicity and unmet need, adjusting for sociodemographic, health, and HCBS program (i.e., Medicaid, Older Americans Act [OAA], Program for All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly [PACE]) characteristics, and use of specific service types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 21,739 respondents, 23.3% were Black, 3.4% were Asian, 10.8% were Hispanic, 58.8% were non-Hispanic White, and 3.7% were multiracial or identified with other races/ethnicities. Asian and Black consumers had higher odds of reporting unmet need in personal care than White consumers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.45, p value < 0.01; and aOR, 1.25, p < 0.001, respectively). Asian and Black consumers had significantly higher odds of unmet need in adult day services versus White consumers (aOR, 1.94, p < 0.001 and aOR, 1.39, p < 0.001, respectively). Black consumers had higher odds of unmet need versus non-Hispanic White consumers in meal delivery and caregiver support services (aOR, 1.29; p < 0.01; and aOR 1.26, p < 0.05, respectively). Race and ethnicity were not significantly associated with experiencing unmet need for homemaker/chore or transportation services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future research should identify driving forces in disparities in unmet need to develop culturally appropriate solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unmet need for home and community-based services (HCBS) may disparately impact older adults from racial and ethnic minoritized groups. We examined racial and ethnic differences in unmet need for HCBS among consumers ≥65 years using publicly funded HCBS.

Methods: We analyzed the National Core Indicators-Aging and Disability survey data (2015-2019) from 21,739 community-dwelling HCBS consumers aged ≥65 years in 23 participating states. Outcome measures included self-reported unmet need in six service types (i.e., personal care, homemaker/chore, delivered meals, adult day services, transportation, and caregiver support). Racial and ethnic groups included non-Hispanic Black, Asian, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, and multiracial groups. Logistic regression models examined associations between race and ethnicity and unmet need, adjusting for sociodemographic, health, and HCBS program (i.e., Medicaid, Older Americans Act [OAA], Program for All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly [PACE]) characteristics, and use of specific service types.

Results: Among 21,739 respondents, 23.3% were Black, 3.4% were Asian, 10.8% were Hispanic, 58.8% were non-Hispanic White, and 3.7% were multiracial or identified with other races/ethnicities. Asian and Black consumers had higher odds of reporting unmet need in personal care than White consumers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.45, p value < 0.01; and aOR, 1.25, p < 0.001, respectively). Asian and Black consumers had significantly higher odds of unmet need in adult day services versus White consumers (aOR, 1.94, p < 0.001 and aOR, 1.39, p < 0.001, respectively). Black consumers had higher odds of unmet need versus non-Hispanic White consumers in meal delivery and caregiver support services (aOR, 1.29; p < 0.01; and aOR 1.26, p < 0.05, respectively). Race and ethnicity were not significantly associated with experiencing unmet need for homemaker/chore or transportation services.

Conclusions: Future research should identify driving forces in disparities in unmet need to develop culturally appropriate solutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受政府资助的家庭和社区服务的老年人在未满足需求方面的种族和民族差异。
背景:对家庭和社区服务(HCBS)的需求未得到满足可能会对来自少数种族和族裔群体的老年人造成不同程度的影响。我们研究了使用政府资助的家庭和社区服务(HCBS)的年龄≥65 岁的消费者在家庭和社区服务未满足需求方面的种族和民族差异:我们分析了全国核心指标--老龄和残疾调查数据(2015-2019 年),这些数据来自 23 个参与州的 21739 名年龄≥65 岁、居住在社区的 HCBS 消费者。结果测量包括六种服务类型(即个人护理、家政服务/家务、送餐服务、成人日间服务、交通和护理人员支持)中自我报告的未满足需求。种族和民族群体包括非西班牙裔黑人、亚裔、非西班牙裔白人、西班牙裔和多种族群体。逻辑回归模型检验了种族和民族与未满足需求之间的关联,并对社会人口、健康和 HCBS 计划(即 Medicaid、《美国老年人法案》[OAA]、《老年人全包护理计划》[PACE])特征以及特定服务类型的使用情况进行了调整:在 21739 名受访者中,23.3% 为黑人,3.4% 为亚裔,10.8% 为西班牙裔,58.8% 为非西班牙裔白人,3.7% 为多种族或其他种族/民族。与白人消费者相比,亚裔和黑人消费者报告个人护理需求未得到满足的几率更高(调整后的几率比[aOR],1.45,P值 结论):未来的研究应找出未满足需求差异的驱动因素,以制定文化上合适的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Caring for dementia caregivers: How well does social risk screening reflect unmet needs? End-of-life emergency department use and healthcare expenditures among older adults: A nationally representative study. Antipsychotics for nursing home residents with dementia: Chemical restraints or essential therapeutic intervention? Identifying and quantifying potentially problematic prescribing cascades in clinical practice: A mixed-methods study. Clinical momentum in the care of older adults with advanced dementia: What evidence is there in the medical record?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1