Predicting resistance and pseudoprogression: are minimalistic immunoediting mathematical models capable of forecasting checkpoint inhibitor treatment outcomes in lung cancer?

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1016/j.mbs.2024.109287
Kevin Robert Scibilia , Pirmin Schlicke , Folker Schneller , Christina Kuttler
{"title":"Predicting resistance and pseudoprogression: are minimalistic immunoediting mathematical models capable of forecasting checkpoint inhibitor treatment outcomes in lung cancer?","authors":"Kevin Robert Scibilia ,&nbsp;Pirmin Schlicke ,&nbsp;Folker Schneller ,&nbsp;Christina Kuttler","doi":"10.1016/j.mbs.2024.109287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background:</h3><p>The increased application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 in lung cancer treatment generates clinical need to reliably predict individual patients’ treatment outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><p>To bridge the prediction gap, we examine four different mathematical models in the form of ordinary differential equations, including a novel delayed response model. We rigorously evaluate their individual and combined predictive capabilities with regard to the patients’ progressive disease (PD) status through equal weighting of model-derived outcome probabilities.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>Fitting the complete treatment course, the novel delayed response model (<span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>938</mn></mrow></math></span>) outperformed the simplest model (<span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>865</mn></mrow></math></span>). The model combination was able to reliably predict patient PD outcome with an <strong>overall accuracy of 77%</strong> (sensitivity = 70%, specificity = 81%), solely through calibration with primary tumor longest diameter measurements. It autonomously identified a subset of 51% of patients where predictions with an <strong>overall accuracy of 81%</strong> (sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 81%) can be achieved. All models significantly outperformed a fully data-driven machine learning-based approach.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>: These modeling approaches provide a dynamic baseline framework to support clinicians in treatment decisions by identifying different treatment outcome trajectories with already clinically available measurement data.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations and future directions:</h3><p>Conjoint application of the presented approach with other predictive tools and biomarkers, as well as further disease information (e.g. metastatic stage), could further enhance treatment outcome prediction. We believe the simple model formulations allow widespread adoption of the developed models to other cancer types. Similar models can easily be formulated for other treatment modalities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025556424001470/pdfft?md5=cc3264f4903a5bda0fe2d00c2529cd81&pid=1-s2.0-S0025556424001470-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025556424001470","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:

The increased application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 in lung cancer treatment generates clinical need to reliably predict individual patients’ treatment outcomes.

Methods:

To bridge the prediction gap, we examine four different mathematical models in the form of ordinary differential equations, including a novel delayed response model. We rigorously evaluate their individual and combined predictive capabilities with regard to the patients’ progressive disease (PD) status through equal weighting of model-derived outcome probabilities.

Results:

Fitting the complete treatment course, the novel delayed response model (R2=0.938) outperformed the simplest model (R2=0.865). The model combination was able to reliably predict patient PD outcome with an overall accuracy of 77% (sensitivity = 70%, specificity = 81%), solely through calibration with primary tumor longest diameter measurements. It autonomously identified a subset of 51% of patients where predictions with an overall accuracy of 81% (sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 81%) can be achieved. All models significantly outperformed a fully data-driven machine learning-based approach.

Implications

: These modeling approaches provide a dynamic baseline framework to support clinicians in treatment decisions by identifying different treatment outcome trajectories with already clinically available measurement data.

Limitations and future directions:

Conjoint application of the presented approach with other predictive tools and biomarkers, as well as further disease information (e.g. metastatic stage), could further enhance treatment outcome prediction. We believe the simple model formulations allow widespread adoption of the developed models to other cancer types. Similar models can easily be formulated for other treatment modalities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测耐药性和假性进展:极简免疫编辑数学模型能否预测肺癌检查点抑制剂的治疗结果?
背景:随着以PD-1/PD-L1为靶点的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在肺癌治疗中的应用越来越多,临床上需要可靠地预测个体患者的治疗效果:随着以 PD-1/PD-L1 为靶点的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在肺癌治疗中的应用越来越多,临床上需要可靠地预测个体患者的治疗结果:为了缩小预测差距,我们研究了四种不同的常微分方程数学模型,包括一种新型延迟反应模型。通过对模型得出的结果概率进行等权重加权,我们严格评估了这些模型对患者进展性疾病(PD)状态的单独和组合预测能力:结果:在整个疗程中,新型延迟反应模型(R2=0.938)优于最简单的模型(R2=0.865)。仅通过与原发肿瘤最长直径测量值的校准,该模型组合就能可靠地预测患者的晚期治疗结果,总体准确率为77%(灵敏度=70%,特异度=81%)。它自主确定了 51% 的患者子集,在这些子集中,预测的总体准确率可达 81%(灵敏度 = 81%,特异性 = 81%)。所有模型的表现都明显优于完全基于数据驱动的机器学习方法:这些建模方法提供了一个动态基线框架,通过临床可用的测量数据识别不同的治疗结果轨迹,从而为临床医生的治疗决策提供支持:局限性和未来方向:将所介绍的方法与其他预测工具和生物标志物以及进一步的疾病信息(如转移分期)联合应用,可进一步加强治疗结果预测。我们相信,简单的模型公式可以将所开发的模型广泛应用于其他癌症类型。类似的模型也可以很容易地用于其他治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1