Phytochemical profile and allelopathic activity of eight Eucalyptus species on the performance of initial growth stage of four local species in the southern Tunisia

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Ecological Genetics and Genomics Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1016/j.egg.2024.100291
{"title":"Phytochemical profile and allelopathic activity of eight Eucalyptus species on the performance of initial growth stage of four local species in the southern Tunisia","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.egg.2024.100291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We aimed thought this survey 1) to investigate and compare the phytotoxicity features of eight <em>Eucalyptus</em> species frequently planted in southern Tunisia (<em>Eucalyptus camaldulensis</em> Dehn<em>., Eucalyptus gomphocephala</em> DC., <em>Eucalyptus torquata</em> Luehm., <em>Eucalyptus microtheca</em> F.Muell., <em>Eucalyptus occidentalis</em> Endl., <em>Eucalyptus diversifolia</em> Bonpl.<em>, Eucalyptus sargentii</em> Maiden., and <em>Eucalyptus torwood</em>) on seed germination and radicle growth of <em>Medicago sativa</em> L., <em>Corchorus olitorius</em> L., <em>Cenchrus ciliaris</em> L., <em>Peganum harmala</em> L., and 2) to classify those species according to their allelopathic efficiency. The laboratory experiment was conducted using aqueous extracts made from dried and ground plant leaves to obtain concentrations of 5 % and 10 %. These were prepared alongside control treatments for comparison. Afterward, methanol extracts were utilized in the chemical composition identification procedure via HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS. Different responses were obtained for the species studied for germination and extraction. Results highlighted that <em>C. ciliaris</em> and <em>P. harmala</em> were the most susceptible to eucalypt extracts, while, <em>M. sativa</em> and <em>C. olitorius</em> were more resistant. Statistically, lower concentrations were less effective, but higher ones had noticeable inhibitory effects on seedling growth parameters. We assumed that <em>E. occidentalis</em>, <em>E. gomphocephala</em>, <em>E. torquata</em> and <em>E. camaldulensis</em> were recognized as the most noxious species, <em>E. sargentii</em> and <em>E. microtheca</em> produced moderate effects, while <em>E. torwood</em> and <em>E. diversifolia</em> were regarded as benign species. Phytochemicals especially ellagitannins and flavonols derivatives were the major compounds identified accounted for 21–78 % and 8–59 %, but hydroxycinnamic acids derivatives, gallic acid derivatives, total flavonols content and non-phenolic acids were acknowledged as the major causes for the observed outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37938,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Genetics and Genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Genetics and Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405985424000752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed thought this survey 1) to investigate and compare the phytotoxicity features of eight Eucalyptus species frequently planted in southern Tunisia (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn., Eucalyptus gomphocephala DC., Eucalyptus torquata Luehm., Eucalyptus microtheca F.Muell., Eucalyptus occidentalis Endl., Eucalyptus diversifolia Bonpl., Eucalyptus sargentii Maiden., and Eucalyptus torwood) on seed germination and radicle growth of Medicago sativa L., Corchorus olitorius L., Cenchrus ciliaris L., Peganum harmala L., and 2) to classify those species according to their allelopathic efficiency. The laboratory experiment was conducted using aqueous extracts made from dried and ground plant leaves to obtain concentrations of 5 % and 10 %. These were prepared alongside control treatments for comparison. Afterward, methanol extracts were utilized in the chemical composition identification procedure via HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS. Different responses were obtained for the species studied for germination and extraction. Results highlighted that C. ciliaris and P. harmala were the most susceptible to eucalypt extracts, while, M. sativa and C. olitorius were more resistant. Statistically, lower concentrations were less effective, but higher ones had noticeable inhibitory effects on seedling growth parameters. We assumed that E. occidentalis, E. gomphocephala, E. torquata and E. camaldulensis were recognized as the most noxious species, E. sargentii and E. microtheca produced moderate effects, while E. torwood and E. diversifolia were regarded as benign species. Phytochemicals especially ellagitannins and flavonols derivatives were the major compounds identified accounted for 21–78 % and 8–59 %, but hydroxycinnamic acids derivatives, gallic acid derivatives, total flavonols content and non-phenolic acids were acknowledged as the major causes for the observed outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
突尼斯南部 8 种桉树的植物化学成分和等位活性对 4 种当地树种生长初期的影响
1) 调查和比较突尼斯南部经常种植的 8 个桉树品种(Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn.、Eucalyptus gomphocephala DC.、Eucalyptus torquata Luehm.、Eucalyptus microtheca F.Muell.、Eucalyptus occidentalis Endl、和 Eucalyptus torquata Luehm、Eucalyptus microtheca F.Muell.、Eucalyptus occidentalis Endl.、Eucalyptus diversifolia Bonpl.、Eucalyptus sargentii Maiden.实验室实验使用的是从干燥和研磨的植物叶片中提取的水提取物,浓度分别为 5 % 和 10 %。这些提取物与对照处理一起制备,以进行比较。随后,通过 HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS 对甲醇提取物进行化学成分鉴定。所研究的物种在发芽和萃取过程中得到了不同的反应。结果表明,C. ciliaris 和 P. harmala 最容易受到桉树提取物的影响,而 M. sativa 和 C. olitorius 则更具抵抗力。据统计,浓度越低,效果越差,但浓度越高,对幼苗生长参数的抑制作用越明显。我们认为,E. occidentalis、E. gomphocephala、E. torquata 和 E. camaldulensis 被认为是最有害的物种,E. sargentii 和 E. microtheca 产生的影响适中,而 E. torwood 和 E. diversifolia 被认为是良性物种。植物化学物质,特别是鞣花丹宁和黄酮醇衍生物是已鉴定的主要化合物,分别占 21-78 % 和 8-59 %,但羟基肉桂酸衍生物、没食子酸衍生物、总黄酮含量和非酚酸被认为是造成观察结果的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Genetics and Genomics
Ecological Genetics and Genomics Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Ecological Genetics and Genomics publishes ecological studies of broad interest that provide significant insight into ecological interactions or/ and species diversification. New data in these areas are published as research papers, or methods and resource reports that provide novel information on technologies or tools that will be of interest to a broad readership. Complete data sets are shared where appropriate. The journal also provides Reviews, and Perspectives articles, which present commentary on the latest advances published both here and elsewhere, placing such progress in its broader biological context. Topics include: -metagenomics -population genetics/genomics -evolutionary ecology -conservation and molecular adaptation -speciation genetics -environmental and marine genomics -ecological simulation -genomic divergence of organisms
期刊最新文献
The impact of varying levels of Gibberellic Acid (GA3) on plant growth, flowering, flower quality, seed yield, and quality of Petunia(Petunia × hybrida Vilm.) Genetic basis of coat colour variation in members of genus Panthera Genetic diversity and structure of Tunisian and Indian date palm (Phoenix dactylifera and sylvestris) cultivars and genotypes revealed by AFLP markers Deciphering genome sequence of Paenibacillus illinoisensis strain YWY-3.1: A chitinase, cellulase, and amylase producer Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes among Escherichia coli isolates of buffalo mastitis milk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1