The roadblocks to success – Identifying challenges in implementing a surgery support E-health solution: A qualitative interview study

Cory James Williams , Jed Duff
{"title":"The roadblocks to success – Identifying challenges in implementing a surgery support E-health solution: A qualitative interview study","authors":"Cory James Williams ,&nbsp;Jed Duff","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2024.100427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Surgery accounts for 30 % of the global disease burden, but healthcare systems struggle with managing surgical waitlists, optimising operations, and minimising cancellations, leading to poor patient outcomes and financial strain. E-health technologies offer promising solutions to enhance perioperative care and improve surgical outcomes, yet their integration faces significant organisational and structural challenges. This paper aims to explore and analyse the perspectives of decision-making personnel regarding the challenges and opportunities of implementing a surgery support e-health application.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study utilised an explorative qualitative approach, employing a rapid cycle qualitative evaluation informed by the NASSS framework. Data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews with decision-making personnel conducted. Framework analysis guided by the NASSS framework was used to analyse the interview transcripts.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 15 participants from public health and external organisations participated in the study. The analysis, framed by the seven domains of the NASSS framework, critical challenges in integrating new health technologies, emphasising the need for compatibility, cybersecurity, and demonstrating clear benefits. Key factors for successful adoption included early and continuous stakeholder engagement, organisational readiness, and ongoing support. Additionally, participants highlighted the importance of centralised information systems and continuous adaptation of health IT solutions to meet evolving needs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This paper reveals that implementing surgical e-health interventions is a complex process fraught with organisational, technical, financial, and political challenges, particularly due to insufficient end-user involvement and the intricate healthcare landscape. Despite the recognised benefits, successful implementation necessitates comprehensive stakeholder engagement and co-design approaches. Additionally, while a partnership between commercial vendors and public health developers presents an attractive solution, significant obstacles such as intellectual property disputes and resource allocation must be overcome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240560302400061X/pdfft?md5=8043e8a3133bdf629252a8d938499a91&pid=1-s2.0-S240560302400061X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240560302400061X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Surgery accounts for 30 % of the global disease burden, but healthcare systems struggle with managing surgical waitlists, optimising operations, and minimising cancellations, leading to poor patient outcomes and financial strain. E-health technologies offer promising solutions to enhance perioperative care and improve surgical outcomes, yet their integration faces significant organisational and structural challenges. This paper aims to explore and analyse the perspectives of decision-making personnel regarding the challenges and opportunities of implementing a surgery support e-health application.

Methods

This study utilised an explorative qualitative approach, employing a rapid cycle qualitative evaluation informed by the NASSS framework. Data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews with decision-making personnel conducted. Framework analysis guided by the NASSS framework was used to analyse the interview transcripts.

Results

A total of 15 participants from public health and external organisations participated in the study. The analysis, framed by the seven domains of the NASSS framework, critical challenges in integrating new health technologies, emphasising the need for compatibility, cybersecurity, and demonstrating clear benefits. Key factors for successful adoption included early and continuous stakeholder engagement, organisational readiness, and ongoing support. Additionally, participants highlighted the importance of centralised information systems and continuous adaptation of health IT solutions to meet evolving needs.

Conclusion

This paper reveals that implementing surgical e-health interventions is a complex process fraught with organisational, technical, financial, and political challenges, particularly due to insufficient end-user involvement and the intricate healthcare landscape. Despite the recognised benefits, successful implementation necessitates comprehensive stakeholder engagement and co-design approaches. Additionally, while a partnership between commercial vendors and public health developers presents an attractive solution, significant obstacles such as intellectual property disputes and resource allocation must be overcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成功的路障--确定实施手术支持电子健康解决方案的挑战:定性访谈研究
背景手术占全球疾病负担的 30%,但医疗保健系统在管理手术候诊名单、优化手术和尽量减少取消手术方面却举步维艰,导致患者治疗效果不佳和财务紧张。电子医疗技术为加强围手术期护理和改善手术效果提供了前景广阔的解决方案,但这些技术的整合在组织和结构上面临着巨大挑战。本文旨在探讨和分析决策人员对实施手术支持电子健康应用所面临的挑战和机遇的看法。方法本研究采用了探索性的定性方法,在 NASSS 框架的指导下采用了快速循环定性评估。通过对决策人员进行半结构化访谈收集数据。结果 共有 15 名来自公共卫生和外部机构的人员参与了这项研究。分析以 NASSS 框架的七个领域为框架,分析了整合新卫生技术的关键挑战,强调了兼容性、网络安全和展示明确效益的必要性。成功采用的关键因素包括利益相关者的早期和持续参与、组织准备就绪以及持续支持。本文揭示了实施外科电子医疗干预是一个复杂的过程,充满了组织、技术、财务和政治方面的挑战,特别是由于最终用户参与不足和医疗环境错综复杂。尽管好处众所周知,但成功实施仍需要利益相关者的全面参与和共同设计方法。此外,虽然商业供应商和公共卫生开发商之间的合作是一种有吸引力的解决方案,但必须克服知识产权纠纷和资源分配等重大障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.
期刊最新文献
A study of the relationship between professional autonomy and professional quality of life among operating room personnel: A cross-sectional study Postoperative mechanical ventilation after corrective Tetralogy of Fallot surgery in infants: Assessment of perioperative factors and radiographic severity scores Compliance evaluation in post-anesthesia care units at teaching hospitals in Alborz Province, Iran Anaesthetic management of caesarean section in a primigravida with pre-eclampsia, pleural effusion, consolidation, and lung collapse – a case report The effect of surgical smoke on operating room workers, attitudes towards risks, and the implementation of preventive measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1