Chemically Resolved Respiratory Deposition of Ultrafine Particles Characterized by Number Concentration in the Urban Atmosphere.

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL 环境科学与技术 Pub Date : 2024-09-17 Epub Date: 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1021/acs.est.4c03279
Jinghao Zhai, Shi Shao, Xin Yang, Yaling Zeng, Tzung-May Fu, Lei Zhu, Huizhong Shen, Jianhuai Ye, Chen Wang, Shu Tao
{"title":"Chemically Resolved Respiratory Deposition of Ultrafine Particles Characterized by Number Concentration in the Urban Atmosphere.","authors":"Jinghao Zhai, Shi Shao, Xin Yang, Yaling Zeng, Tzung-May Fu, Lei Zhu, Huizhong Shen, Jianhuai Ye, Chen Wang, Shu Tao","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c03279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ultrafine particles (UFPs) dominate the atmospheric particles in number concentration, impacting human health and climate change. However, existing studies primarily rely on mass-based approaches, leading to a restricted understanding of the number-based and chemically resolved health effects of atmospheric UFPs. In this study, we utilized a high-mass-resolution single-particle aerosol mass spectrometer to investigate the online chemical composition and number size distribution of ultrafine, fine, and coarse particles during the summertime in urban Shenzhen, China. Human respiratory deposition dose assessments of particles with varying chemical compositions were further conducted by a respiratory deposition model. The results showed that during our observation, particles containing elemental carbon (EC) were the dominant components in UFPs (0.05-0.1 μm). Compared to fine and coarse particles, UFPs can deposit more deeply into the respiratory tract with a daily dose of ∼2.08 ± 0.67 billion particles. Among the deposited UFPs, EC-cluster particles constituted ∼85.7% in number fraction, accounting for a daily number dose of ∼1.78 billion particles, which poses a greater impact on human health. Simultaneously, we found discrepancies in the chemically resolved particle depositions among number-, surface area-, and mass-based approaches, emphasizing the importance of an appropriate metric for particle health-risk evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c03279","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ultrafine particles (UFPs) dominate the atmospheric particles in number concentration, impacting human health and climate change. However, existing studies primarily rely on mass-based approaches, leading to a restricted understanding of the number-based and chemically resolved health effects of atmospheric UFPs. In this study, we utilized a high-mass-resolution single-particle aerosol mass spectrometer to investigate the online chemical composition and number size distribution of ultrafine, fine, and coarse particles during the summertime in urban Shenzhen, China. Human respiratory deposition dose assessments of particles with varying chemical compositions were further conducted by a respiratory deposition model. The results showed that during our observation, particles containing elemental carbon (EC) were the dominant components in UFPs (0.05-0.1 μm). Compared to fine and coarse particles, UFPs can deposit more deeply into the respiratory tract with a daily dose of ∼2.08 ± 0.67 billion particles. Among the deposited UFPs, EC-cluster particles constituted ∼85.7% in number fraction, accounting for a daily number dose of ∼1.78 billion particles, which poses a greater impact on human health. Simultaneously, we found discrepancies in the chemically resolved particle depositions among number-, surface area-, and mass-based approaches, emphasizing the importance of an appropriate metric for particle health-risk evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以城市大气中超细粒子数量浓度为特征的化学分辨率呼吸沉积。
超细粒子(UFPs)在大气粒子的数量浓度中占主导地位,对人类健康和气候变化产生影响。然而,现有的研究主要依赖于基于质量的方法,导致人们对基于数量和化学解析的大气超细粒子对健康影响的了解受到限制。在这项研究中,我们利用高分辨率单颗粒气溶胶质谱仪,研究了中国深圳市夏季超细、细和粗颗粒物的在线化学成分和数量级分布。并通过呼吸沉降模型对不同化学成分的颗粒物进行了人体呼吸沉降剂量评估。结果表明,在我们的观测过程中,含有元素碳(EC)的颗粒物是UFPs(0.05-0.1 μm)的主要成分。与细颗粒和粗颗粒相比,UFP 能更深地沉积在呼吸道中,每天的沉积量为 20.8±0.67 亿个。在沉积的 UFPs 中,EC-cluster 颗粒占数量分数的 85.7%,每天的数量剂量为 17.8 亿个颗粒,对人体健康的影响更大。同时,我们发现基于数量、表面积和质量的方法在化学分解颗粒沉积方面存在差异,这强调了适当的颗粒健康风险评估指标的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
期刊最新文献
Advancing Breathomics through Accurate Discrimination of Endogenous from Exogenous Volatiles in Breath Mapping Microplastic Movement: A Phase Diagram to Predict Nonbuoyant Microplastic Modes of Transport at the Particle Scale Resolving Atmospheric Oxygenated Organic Molecules in Urban Beijing Using Online Ultrahigh-Resolution Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry Iron Nanoparticles-Confined Graphene Oxide Membranes Coupled with Sulfite-Based Advanced Reduction Processes for Highly Efficient and Stable Removal of Bromate Proton vs Electron: The Dual Role of Redox-Inactive Metal Ions in Permanganate Oxidation Kinetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1