Understanding facilitators and barriers to oxygen therapy for patients with interstitial lung disease.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMJ Open Respiratory Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002339
Heather Sharpe, Samira D Rowland, Charlotte Pooler, Giovanni Ferrara, Kerri A Johannson, Meena Kalluri, Irvin Mayers, Michael K Stickland
{"title":"Understanding facilitators and barriers to oxygen therapy for patients with interstitial lung disease.","authors":"Heather Sharpe, Samira D Rowland, Charlotte Pooler, Giovanni Ferrara, Kerri A Johannson, Meena Kalluri, Irvin Mayers, Michael K Stickland","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is comprised of a heterogeneous group of pulmonary diseases. Oxygen therapy is used in patients with advanced lung disease; however, there are challenges associated with initiation of oxygen therapy specific to individuals with ILD. The key objectives of this study were to create a common understanding of the facilitators and barriers to oxygen therapy for patients with ILD, and healthcare professionals (HCP) caring for patients with ILD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study included 1 hour semistructured focus groups/interviews. An iterative and concurrent process was used for data collection and analysis to allow for supplementary development of themes and concepts generated. Data analysis used a three-phase approach: coding, categorising and development of themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 patients and/or caregivers and 31 HCP took part in 34 focus groups/interviews held over 3 months (November 2022-January 2023). Facilitators to oxygen therapy were identified including support from HCP and support groups, the perseverance and self-advocacy of patients, a straightforward administrative process and vendors/private industry that expedite access to oxygen therapy. There were also several barriers to accessing oxygen therapy for patients with ILD. The themes identified include rural disparity, testing requirements and qualifying for funding and the need for ILD-specific evidence base for oxygen therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further research is needed to facilitate development of specific exertional oxygen criteria for patients with ILD, to create supports for oxygen use and monitoring and to enable providers to tailor therapy to patients. Oxygen therapy education for ILD should address the benefits and risks of oxygen therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is comprised of a heterogeneous group of pulmonary diseases. Oxygen therapy is used in patients with advanced lung disease; however, there are challenges associated with initiation of oxygen therapy specific to individuals with ILD. The key objectives of this study were to create a common understanding of the facilitators and barriers to oxygen therapy for patients with ILD, and healthcare professionals (HCP) caring for patients with ILD.

Methods: This qualitative study included 1 hour semistructured focus groups/interviews. An iterative and concurrent process was used for data collection and analysis to allow for supplementary development of themes and concepts generated. Data analysis used a three-phase approach: coding, categorising and development of themes.

Results: A total of 20 patients and/or caregivers and 31 HCP took part in 34 focus groups/interviews held over 3 months (November 2022-January 2023). Facilitators to oxygen therapy were identified including support from HCP and support groups, the perseverance and self-advocacy of patients, a straightforward administrative process and vendors/private industry that expedite access to oxygen therapy. There were also several barriers to accessing oxygen therapy for patients with ILD. The themes identified include rural disparity, testing requirements and qualifying for funding and the need for ILD-specific evidence base for oxygen therapy.

Conclusion: Further research is needed to facilitate development of specific exertional oxygen criteria for patients with ILD, to create supports for oxygen use and monitoring and to enable providers to tailor therapy to patients. Oxygen therapy education for ILD should address the benefits and risks of oxygen therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解间质性肺病患者接受氧疗的促进因素和障碍。
背景:间质性肺病(ILD)由多种肺部疾病组成。氧疗适用于晚期肺部疾病患者;然而,ILD 患者在开始氧疗时会遇到一些特殊的挑战。本研究的主要目的是就 ILD 患者和护理 ILD 患者的医疗保健专业人员(HCP)接受氧疗的促进因素和障碍达成共识:这项定性研究包括一个小时的半结构式焦点小组/访谈。数据收集和分析采用迭代和并行的过程,以便对产生的主题和概念进行补充发展。数据分析采用三阶段法:编码、分类和发展主题:共有 20 名患者和/或护理人员以及 31 名保健专业人员参加了为期 3 个月(2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 1 月)的 34 个焦点小组/访谈。研究发现,促进氧疗的因素包括来自保健服务提供者和支持团体的支持、患者的毅力和自我主张、简单明了的行政程序以及加快氧疗进程的供应商/私营企业。此外,ILD 患者在获得氧疗方面还存在一些障碍。确定的主题包括农村地区的差异、测试要求和获得资助的资格,以及需要针对 ILD 的氧气疗法证据基础:需要进一步开展研究,以便为 ILD 患者制定特定的用力吸氧标准,为氧气的使用和监测提供支持,并使医疗服务提供者能够为患者量身定制治疗方案。针对 ILD 的氧疗教育应涉及氧疗的益处和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Firefighters' occupational exposure to air pollution: impact on COPD and asthma-study protocol. Risk factors for incidence of interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pleural effusion in acute pulmonary embolism: characteristics and relevance. Pim1 inactivating induces RUNX3 upregulation that improves/alleviates airway inflammation and mucus hypersecretion in vitro and in vivo. Agreement and comparative accuracy of instability criteria at discharge for predicting adverse events in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1