Impact of causative organism identification on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive posterior fixation for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis: multicenter retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08479-0
Hisanori Gamada, Toru Funayama, Tomoyuki Asada, Yusuke Setojima, Takane Nakagawa, Takahiro Sunami, Kotaro Sakashita, Yosuke Ogata, Shun Okuwaki, Kaishi Ogawa, Yosuke Shibao, Hiroshi Kumagai, Katsuya Nagashima, Kengo Fujii, Yosuke Takeuchi, Masaki Tatsumura, Itsuo Shiina, Masafumi Uesugi, Masao Koda
{"title":"Impact of causative organism identification on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive posterior fixation for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis: multicenter retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Hisanori Gamada, Toru Funayama, Tomoyuki Asada, Yusuke Setojima, Takane Nakagawa, Takahiro Sunami, Kotaro Sakashita, Yosuke Ogata, Shun Okuwaki, Kaishi Ogawa, Yosuke Shibao, Hiroshi Kumagai, Katsuya Nagashima, Kengo Fujii, Yosuke Takeuchi, Masaki Tatsumura, Itsuo Shiina, Masafumi Uesugi, Masao Koda","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08479-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the difference in treatment duration and unplanned additional surgeries between patients with unidentified causative organisms on empiric antibiotics and those with identified organisms on selective antibiotics in treating thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis with minimally invasive posterior fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis refractory to conservative treatment who underwent minimally invasive posterior fixation. Patients were divided into the identified (known causative organism) and unidentified groups (unknown causative organism). We analyzed data on demographics, antibiotic use, surgical outcomes, and infection control indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 74 patients, with 52 (70%) and 22 (30%) in the identified and unidentified groups, respectively. On admission, the identified group had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and more iliopsoas abscesses. The duration to postoperative CRP negative was similar in the identified and unidentified groups (7.13 vs. 6.48 weeks, p = 0.74). Only the identified group had unplanned additional surgeries due to poor infection control, affecting 6 of 52 patients (12%). Advanced age and causative organism identification increased the additional surgery odds (odds ratio [OR], 8.25; p = 0.033 and OR, 6.83; p = 0.034, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of empiric antibiotics in minimally invasive posterior fixation was effective without identifying the causative organism and did not prolong treatment duration. In patients with identified organisms, 12% required unplanned additional surgery, indicating a more challenging infection control. Causative organism identification was associated with the need for additional surgery, suggesting a more cautious treatment strategy for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"4682-4692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08479-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the difference in treatment duration and unplanned additional surgeries between patients with unidentified causative organisms on empiric antibiotics and those with identified organisms on selective antibiotics in treating thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis with minimally invasive posterior fixation.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis refractory to conservative treatment who underwent minimally invasive posterior fixation. Patients were divided into the identified (known causative organism) and unidentified groups (unknown causative organism). We analyzed data on demographics, antibiotic use, surgical outcomes, and infection control indicators.

Results: We included 74 patients, with 52 (70%) and 22 (30%) in the identified and unidentified groups, respectively. On admission, the identified group had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and more iliopsoas abscesses. The duration to postoperative CRP negative was similar in the identified and unidentified groups (7.13 vs. 6.48 weeks, p = 0.74). Only the identified group had unplanned additional surgeries due to poor infection control, affecting 6 of 52 patients (12%). Advanced age and causative organism identification increased the additional surgery odds (odds ratio [OR], 8.25; p = 0.033 and OR, 6.83; p = 0.034, respectively).

Conclusion: The use of empiric antibiotics in minimally invasive posterior fixation was effective without identifying the causative organism and did not prolong treatment duration. In patients with identified organisms, 12% required unplanned additional surgery, indicating a more challenging infection control. Causative organism identification was associated with the need for additional surgery, suggesting a more cautious treatment strategy for these patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸腰椎化脓性脊柱炎微创后固定术后致病菌鉴定对临床疗效的影响:多中心回顾性队列研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估在使用微创后固定术治疗胸腰椎化脓性脊柱炎时,使用经验性抗生素的未确定致病菌患者与使用选择性抗生素的已确定致病菌患者在治疗时间和计划外额外手术方面的差异:这项多中心回顾性队列研究纳入了接受微创后固定术的保守治疗无效的胸腰椎化脓性脊柱炎患者。患者被分为已确定组(已知致病菌)和未确定组(未知致病菌)。我们分析了人口统计学、抗生素使用、手术结果和感染控制指标等数据:我们共纳入了 74 名患者,其中已确认组和未确认组分别有 52 人(70%)和 22 人(30%)。入院时,发现组的C反应蛋白(CRP)水平较高,髂腰部脓肿较多。已确定组和未确定组的术后 CRP 阴性持续时间相似(7.13 对 6.48 周,P = 0.74)。只有已确认组患者因感染控制不佳而进行了计划外的额外手术,52 名患者中有 6 名(12%)受到影响。高龄和致病菌鉴定增加了额外手术的几率(几率比[OR]分别为8.25;p = 0.033和OR为6.83;p = 0.034):结论:在微创后路固定术中使用经验性抗生素有效,但不能确定致病菌,也不会延长治疗时间。在鉴定出病原菌的患者中,12%需要进行计划外的额外手术,这表明感染控制更具挑战性。致病菌的鉴定与额外手术的需求相关,这表明对这些患者应采取更谨慎的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal impact of leisure-time physical activity on pain intensity and daily activity limitation in people with low back pain. Findings from the PAMPA cohort. Epidemiology of pediatric spinal trauma with neurological deficits in Catalonia: a 36-year experience. Morphological features of lower lumbar degenerative kyphosis. MRI study on the influence of lumbosacral vertebral body and disc factors on lumbar lordosis in children. Presence of compensatory curve predicts postoperative curve progression in congenital scoliosis after thoracolumbar hemivertebra resection and short fusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1