European Spine Journal最新文献

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of surgery in Kummell's disease (KD) to help us select the optimum surgical strategy.

Methods: We included 67 KD patients who underwent Percutaneous vertebral plasty (PVP), Percutaneous kyphosis plasty (PKP), Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) or Posterior decompression osteotomy fixation (PDOF). The differences in imaging parameters and prognosis changes of pre-operation, post-operative and follow-up endpoint were analyzed.

Results: The incidence rate of KD was 10.02% (67/668) in vertebral compressibility fracture. 80.60% of patients underwent PVP/PKP, 14.93% underwent PPSF, and 4.47% underwent PDOF. The significant differences between the actual used surgical methods and the classification recommended surgical strategies could be found. In I type, there was no significant difference in total improvement of the radiography data and clinical efficacy between PVP and PKP. In II type, there was a significant correlation between opening and closing sign (OCS) and surgical choice. Compared with PPSF, the positive OCS patients who underwent PVP/PKP suffered a poor prognosis. PDOF is an effective surgical method for type III, but PVP could also achieve a good prognosis for patients with poor condition.

Conclusion: The mainstream KD classification system has shortcomings, and completely following its treatment strategy may lead to poor prognosis. Compared to PKP, PVP is a better choice for type I patients. OCS is one of the important factors in surgical selection for type II patients. The Li's type III is mainly treated with PDOF but the overall condition of the body needs to be evaluated.

Purpose: Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT), an alternative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, shows satisfactory post-operative results. However, the biomechanical quantities and consequences after VBT surgery remain largely unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the spinal biomechanics during different motions using a multibody simulation approach.

Methods: The tether and intervertebral compression forces were simulated in a validated spine model during different physiological movements at different pre-tensions and screw positions, while considering the anatomical muscle and ligament properties.

Results: The simulations showed that an augmentation of the pre-tension and an alteration of the screw position have both significant impact on the intervertebral compression and tether forces. The forces also vary depending on the movement performed, with the highest tether forces measured during lateral bending. In the upright position, with a pre-tension of 200 N, the maximum compression force increases by up to 157% compared to the untethered maximum compression force. The screw position can lead to large differences in the distribution of forces in the spine.

Conclusion: The biomechanical data provide a first impression of the forces that occur along the spine during various physiological movements and are consistent with published clinical data. Forces are not evenly distributed along the spine, with higher lumbar forces. The tether forces reach values during lateral bending that can potentially destroy the tether´s integrity and thus may explain the common post-operative complication, namely tether breakage. The results of the model can therefore have an impact on future directions for improved surgical VBT treatment.

Purpose: To report a rare case of isolated lumbar vertebral body infarction following lumbar artery embolization for suspected retroperitoneal haemorrhage.

Methods: We present the case of a 75-year-old male who underwent lumbar artery embolization due to a suspected retroperitoneal haemorrhage post-surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to monitor post-embolization severe lumbar pain.

Results: Initial MRI two days post-embolization showed no osseous signal changes or epidural abscess. A subsequent MRI 26 days post-embolization was performed because of increasing lumbar back pain and it revealed a new bone infarction at the L3 vertebral body. CT showed embolization deposits within the vertebral body, not present before the procedure.

Conclusion: This unique case underscores the importance of considering vertebral body infarction as a potential complication following lumbar artery embolization. MRI was critical in early detection of the bone infarction, while CT confirmed the presence of embolization material. Awareness of this rare complication is crucial for prompt diagnosis and management.

Purpose: To describe the clinical outcomes beyond pain relief of high-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz (10 kHz SCS) in a patient with cervical myelopathy and drug-resistant chronic neuropathic pain with spastic tetraparesis.

Methods: A patient with C3-C6 myelomalacia and spastic tetraparesis previously treated with decompressive laminectomy underwent implantation of 10 kHz SCS for pain management through a trial procedure followed by permanent implantation. Due to the presence of epidural fibrotic scar tissue in the area of the previous C3-C6 laminectomy, the leads could not be implanted at the cervical level; therefore, the leads were positioned at the thoracic level. Data were collected during routine follow-up visits up to 15 months after implantation.

Results: Since the trialing phase and during all follow-up visits, along with complete pain relief in the lower limbs, a recovery from spasms was observed with an improvement in motor function. The patient recovered from a sensation of stiffness and difficulty in movement, with a significant decrease in muscle tone, regaining confidence in walking, and no longer needing assistance even for long walking distances. Although all disabling and painful symptomatology in the upper limbs instead did not ameliorate, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score decreased from 50% at baseline to 6%.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, recovery from spasms and motor improvement in a spastic tetraparesis patient has never been reported before with 10 kHz SCS and possibly this new stimulation paradigm may overcome some performance limitations of traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS). Treatment eliminated spasms at the lower limbs but not at the upper ones, thus suggesting that the location of the epidural leads could affect outcomes.

Background: Since scoliosis is a three-dimensional deformity, it causes some movement limitations in the spine and related joints. However, functional limitations associated with scoliosis-related hip joint involvement are the subject of research.

Aims: This study aims to investigate the physical characteristics and functional limitations associated with idiopathic scoliosis (IS), focusing on hip joint.

Methods: Demographic characteristics, scoliosis-specific assessments and hip joint active range of motion (RoM), lumbar mobility (Modified Schober test), lumbopelvic stability (Single leg squat test-SLS), hip joint position sense, lower extremity balance (Y-balance test) and lower extremity functionality (Lower extremity functional scale-LEFS) were evaluated.

Results: The study included 120 individuals, with 86 in the scoliosis group (mean age: 15.7 ± 3.4 years) and 34 in the control group (mean age: 16.1 ± 4.8 years). The scoliosis group exhibited limited RoM of the hip joint in flexion, extension, right abduction, adduction, internal rotation, and left external rotation compared to controls (p < 0.001). Lumbar mobility was decreased (p < 0.001). In the joint position sense test, the mean difference for right flexion was and for left flexion. Bilateral decreased SLS test performances (p < 0.001) and Y-balance test performance (p < 0.05) in individuals with IS. LEFS scores were statistically different but not clinically different between groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Individuals with IS show decreased hip mobility, lumbopelvic stability, hip joint position sense, and balance compared to healthy peers; however, these limitations do not have a clinical impact on daily living activities.

Purpose: National Clinical Guidelines recommend an integrated combination of conservative management strategies for sciatica. However, the efficacy of such combinations have not been established. The purpose of this systemic review with meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of combined conservative (non-pharmacological) compared to single interventions for people with sciatica with a confirmed neuropathic mechanism.

Methods: The systematic review was registered on PROSPERO CRD42023464011. The databases included were the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase, PubMed, Scopus, APA PsycINFO, and grey literature sources from inception until January 2024. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness of combined non-pharmacological interventions in comparison to a control intervention among individuals with sciatica of a neuropathic origin identified using diagnostic or clinical tests. Primary outcomes were back pain, leg pain, and disability. The secondary outcome was global rating of change. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment (using Cochrane ROB2) were assessed by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model with inverse variance weighting used for the metanalysis using SPSS v 29.

Results: 3,370 articles were identified, of which 6 were included. Risk of bias was high in one study and had some concerns in the remaining 5 studies for each outcome measure. There was evidence of efficacy for combined interventions for back pain in the short-and long-term (SMD - 0.56 (95% CI -0.91, -0.22, p = 0.01, I² = 0.2; SMD - 0.44 (95% CI -0.79, -0.1, p = 0.03, I² = 0.00), and for disability in the short term (SMD - 0.48 (95% CI -0.92, -0.04, p = 0.04, I² = 0.72). There was no evidence of efficacy for leg pain at any time point (( short term SMD - 0.45 (95% CI -0.91, 0.02, p = 0.06, I² = 0.65), medium term (SMD - 0.29 (95% CI -1.12, 0.54, p = 0.35, I² = 0.82), long term (SMD - 0.40 (95% CI -1.23, 0.44, p = 0.18, I² = 0.57).Certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate.

Conclusion: There are few studies that have combined conservative (non-pharmacological) interventions for the management of sciatica with a neuropathic component pain mechanism, as recommended by National Clinical Guidelines. This review indicates that combining conservative (no-pharmacological) management strategies appeared more effective than single interventions for the outcomes of low back pain in the short and long term, and for disability in the short term, but not for leg pain at any time point. The overall low certainty of evidence, suggests that future studies with more robust methodologies are needed.

Purpose: The purpose of this cross-sectional, observational study was to establish the relationship between standing lumbar lordosis (LL) and lateral decubitus LL.

Methods: Forty-nine subjects, 24 male and 25 female, were prospectively enrolled. Patients with pre-existing spinopelvic pathology were excluded. Standing, relaxed-seated, and lateral decubitus lateral radiographs were obtained. Radiographic variables measured included LL and lordosis change at each lumbar level (e.g. L1-L2). The change in LL when going from a standing to a lateral decubitus position (ΔLL), the correlation between standing and sitting LL compared to lateral decubitus LL, and the correlation between ΔLL and standing pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), PI-LL mismatch, pelvic femoral angle (PFA), and sacral slope (SS) were calculated.

Results: Subjects had an average age of 25.7 ± 2.3 years and body mass index of 24.1 ± 3.0 kg/m². On average, 11.9°±8.2° (range - 7° to 29°) of LL was lost when transitioning from a standing to the lateral decubitus position. Lateral decubitus LL had a higher correlation with standing LL (R = 0.725, p < 0.001) than with relaxed-seated LL (R = 0.434, p < 0.001). Standing PT and PI-LL mismatch had moderately negative correlations with ΔLL (R=-0.58 and R=-0.59, respectively, both p < 0.05). Standing PI and standing PFA had a low negative correlation with ΔLL (R=-0.31 and R=-0.44, respectively, both p < 0.05) Standing SS and LL had no correlation with ΔLL.

Conclusions: Standing LL was strongly correlated to lateral decubitus LL, although subjects lost an average of 11.9° from the standing to the lateral decubitus position. This has important implications for fusion in the lateral position.