Alcohol-based hand rubs can fulfil efficacy requirements of EN 1500 in 15 seconds.

IF 1.7 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH GMS Hygiene and Infection Control Pub Date : 2024-08-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3205/dgkh000496
Erika Mönch, Astrid Bolten, Heide Niesalla, Christoph Senges
{"title":"Alcohol-based hand rubs can fulfil efficacy requirements of EN 1500 in 15 seconds.","authors":"Erika Mönch, Astrid Bolten, Heide Niesalla, Christoph Senges","doi":"10.3205/dgkh000496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Correct hand hygiene is widely regarded as an important measure to prevent healthcare-associated infections. Guidelines on how to perform hand antisepsis are often inspired by laboratory tests that focus on reproducibility rather than ease of use. These cumbersome recommendations can become barriers to hand hygiene, as optimal user acceptance requires a small rub volume and a short application time with an intuitive rubbing technique. Here we modified the EN 1500 to test the efficacy of hand rubs under more user-friendly conditions, using a highly intuitive rubbing technique in 15 seconds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The efficacy of an ethanolic and a propanolic hand rub in inactivating <i>E. coli</i> on the hands of volunteers was tested according to EN 1500 with modifications in rubbing technique and time. Pre-tests were conducted to find a suitable volume for \"responsible application\", a procedure without clearly defined steps. Finally, 20 volunteers applied both rubs for 15 seconds using 3 mL and \"responsible application\" and 5 mL using the WHO 6-step technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both hand rubs, ethanolic and propanolic, were non-inferior to an unmodified EN 1500 reference for both application methods, 3 mL with \"responsible application\" and 5 mL with the WHO 6-step method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reducing the complexity of hand rub application can have a positive impact on hand hygiene adherence. With our results showing that antimicrobial efficacy comparable to an unmodified EN 1500 can be achieved in 15 seconds using an intuitive rubbing technique, further barriers to more user-friendly hand rub application have been removed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12738,"journal":{"name":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","volume":"19 ","pages":"Doc41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Correct hand hygiene is widely regarded as an important measure to prevent healthcare-associated infections. Guidelines on how to perform hand antisepsis are often inspired by laboratory tests that focus on reproducibility rather than ease of use. These cumbersome recommendations can become barriers to hand hygiene, as optimal user acceptance requires a small rub volume and a short application time with an intuitive rubbing technique. Here we modified the EN 1500 to test the efficacy of hand rubs under more user-friendly conditions, using a highly intuitive rubbing technique in 15 seconds.

Methods: The efficacy of an ethanolic and a propanolic hand rub in inactivating E. coli on the hands of volunteers was tested according to EN 1500 with modifications in rubbing technique and time. Pre-tests were conducted to find a suitable volume for "responsible application", a procedure without clearly defined steps. Finally, 20 volunteers applied both rubs for 15 seconds using 3 mL and "responsible application" and 5 mL using the WHO 6-step technique.

Results: Both hand rubs, ethanolic and propanolic, were non-inferior to an unmodified EN 1500 reference for both application methods, 3 mL with "responsible application" and 5 mL with the WHO 6-step method.

Conclusion: Reducing the complexity of hand rub application can have a positive impact on hand hygiene adherence. With our results showing that antimicrobial efficacy comparable to an unmodified EN 1500 can be achieved in 15 seconds using an intuitive rubbing technique, further barriers to more user-friendly hand rub application have been removed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酒精搓手液可以在 15 秒内达到 EN 1500 的功效要求。
目的:正确的手部卫生被广泛认为是预防医疗相关感染的重要措施。关于如何进行手部防腐的指南通常受实验室测试的启发,注重可重复性而非易用性。这些繁琐的建议可能会成为手部卫生的障碍,因为要让用户接受,就必须采用直观的擦拭技术,擦拭量小、擦拭时间短。在此,我们对 EN 1500 进行了修改,在更方便用户使用的条件下,使用高度直观的擦手技术在 15 秒内测试擦手液的功效:方法:根据 EN 1500 标准,对乙醇和丙醇擦手液灭活志愿者手上大肠杆菌的功效进行了测试,并对擦手技巧和时间进行了修改。为找到 "负责任的涂抹 "的合适量,进行了预先测试,这是一个没有明确步骤的程序。最后,20 名志愿者使用 3 毫升 "负责任地使用 "和 5 毫升 "世界卫生组织 6 步技术 "两种擦手液,时间均为 15 秒:结果:乙醇和丙醇两种擦手液在两种涂抹方法中的效果均不优于未经改良的 EN 1500 参考文献,即 3 毫升 "负责任的涂抹 "和 5 毫升世界卫生组织 6 步涂抹法:结论:降低涂抹擦手液的复杂性可对手部卫生的依从性产生积极影响。我们的研究结果表明,使用直观的涂抹技术在 15 秒内就能达到与未改良 EN 1500 相当的抗菌效果,这进一步消除了使用更方便的擦手纸的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Equivalent reduction of Escherichia coli by rinsing hands with cold and warm water. Etiologic assessment of palatal petechiae - a case report. Investigation of the efficiency of different reprocessing methods on disposable laryngeal masks contaminated with HBV DNA. Monkeypox: Oral manifestation as diagnostic indicator. Online survey on barriers and drivers to flu vaccination among staff at a German university hospital during the Covid-19 pandemic 2022 (flu-vaccination motive study).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1