Implementation of a Secure Firearm Storage Program in Pediatric Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

IF 24.7 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS JAMA Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.3274
Rinad S Beidas, Kristin A Linn, Jennifer M Boggs, Steven C Marcus, Katelin Hoskins, Shari Jager-Hyman, Christina Johnson, Melissa Maye, LeeAnn Quintana, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Leslie Wright, Celeste Pappas, Arne Beck, Katy Bedjeti, Alison M Buttenheim, Matthew F Daley, Marisa Elias, Jason Lyons, Melissa Lynne Martin, Bridget McArdle, Debra P Ritzwoller, Dylan S Small, Nathaniel J Williams, Shiling Zhang, Brian K Ahmedani
{"title":"Implementation of a Secure Firearm Storage Program in Pediatric Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Trial.","authors":"Rinad S Beidas, Kristin A Linn, Jennifer M Boggs, Steven C Marcus, Katelin Hoskins, Shari Jager-Hyman, Christina Johnson, Melissa Maye, LeeAnn Quintana, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Leslie Wright, Celeste Pappas, Arne Beck, Katy Bedjeti, Alison M Buttenheim, Matthew F Daley, Marisa Elias, Jason Lyons, Melissa Lynne Martin, Bridget McArdle, Debra P Ritzwoller, Dylan S Small, Nathaniel J Williams, Shiling Zhang, Brian K Ahmedani","doi":"10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.3274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Increased secure firearm storage can reduce youth firearm injury and mortality, a leading cause of death for children and adolescents in the US. Despite the availability of evidence-based secure firearm storage programs and recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics, few pediatric clinicians report routinely implementing these programs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR) documentation template (nudge) and the nudge plus facilitation (ie, clinic support to implement the program; nudge+) at promoting delivery of a brief evidence-based secure firearm storage program (SAFE Firearm) that includes counseling about secure firearm storage and free cable locks during all pediatric well visits.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The Adolescent and Child Suicide Prevention in Routine Clinical Encounters (ASPIRE) unblinded parallel cluster randomized effectiveness-implementation trial was conducted from March 14, 2022, to March 20, 2023, to test the hypothesis that, relative to nudge, nudge+ would result in delivery of the firearm storage program to an additional 10% or more of the eligible population, and that this difference would be statistically significant. Thirty pediatric primary care clinics in 2 US health care systems (in Michigan and Colorado) were included, excluding clinics that were not the primary site for participating health care professionals and a subset selected at random due to resource limitations. All pediatric well visits at participating clinics for youth ages 5 to 17 years were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Clinics were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the nudge or nudge+.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Patient-level outcomes were modeled to estimate the primary outcome, reach, which is a visit-level binary indicator of whether the parent received both components of the firearm storage program (counseling and lock), as documented by the clinician in the EHR. Secondary outcomes explored individual program component delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 307 well-child visits (median [IQR] age, 11.3 [8.1-14.4] years; 24 210 [51.2%] male and 23 091 [48.8%] female) among 46 597 children and 368 clinicians were eligible to receive the firearm storage program during the trial and were included in analyses. Using the intention-to-treat principle, a higher percentage of well-child visits received the firearm storage program in the nudge+ condition (49%; 95% CI, 37-61) compared to nudge (22%; 95% CI, 13-31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, the EHR strategy combined with facilitation (nudge+) was more effective at increasing delivery of an evidence-based secure firearm storage program compared to nudge alone.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04844021.</p>","PeriodicalId":14683,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1104-1113"},"PeriodicalIF":24.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.3274","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Increased secure firearm storage can reduce youth firearm injury and mortality, a leading cause of death for children and adolescents in the US. Despite the availability of evidence-based secure firearm storage programs and recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics, few pediatric clinicians report routinely implementing these programs.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR) documentation template (nudge) and the nudge plus facilitation (ie, clinic support to implement the program; nudge+) at promoting delivery of a brief evidence-based secure firearm storage program (SAFE Firearm) that includes counseling about secure firearm storage and free cable locks during all pediatric well visits.

Design, setting, and participants: The Adolescent and Child Suicide Prevention in Routine Clinical Encounters (ASPIRE) unblinded parallel cluster randomized effectiveness-implementation trial was conducted from March 14, 2022, to March 20, 2023, to test the hypothesis that, relative to nudge, nudge+ would result in delivery of the firearm storage program to an additional 10% or more of the eligible population, and that this difference would be statistically significant. Thirty pediatric primary care clinics in 2 US health care systems (in Michigan and Colorado) were included, excluding clinics that were not the primary site for participating health care professionals and a subset selected at random due to resource limitations. All pediatric well visits at participating clinics for youth ages 5 to 17 years were analyzed.

Interventions: Clinics were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the nudge or nudge+.

Main outcomes and measures: Patient-level outcomes were modeled to estimate the primary outcome, reach, which is a visit-level binary indicator of whether the parent received both components of the firearm storage program (counseling and lock), as documented by the clinician in the EHR. Secondary outcomes explored individual program component delivery.

Results: A total of 47 307 well-child visits (median [IQR] age, 11.3 [8.1-14.4] years; 24 210 [51.2%] male and 23 091 [48.8%] female) among 46 597 children and 368 clinicians were eligible to receive the firearm storage program during the trial and were included in analyses. Using the intention-to-treat principle, a higher percentage of well-child visits received the firearm storage program in the nudge+ condition (49%; 95% CI, 37-61) compared to nudge (22%; 95% CI, 13-31).

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, the EHR strategy combined with facilitation (nudge+) was more effective at increasing delivery of an evidence-based secure firearm storage program compared to nudge alone.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04844021.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿科初级保健中实施枪支安全存放计划:分组随机试验
重要性:加强枪支的安全存放可以减少青少年枪支伤害和死亡率,这是美国儿童和青少年死亡的主要原因。尽管有循证的枪支安全存放计划和美国儿科学会的建议,但很少有儿科临床医生表示会常规实施这些计划:目的:比较电子健康记录(EHR)文档模板("推动")和 "推动+促进"(即诊所支持实施该计划;"推动+")在促进实施简短的循证枪支安全存放计划(SAFE Firearm)方面的效果:在 2022 年 3 月 14 日至 2023 年 3 月 20 日期间,开展了 "常规临床就诊中的青少年和儿童自杀预防"(ASPIRE)非盲平行群组随机有效性实施试验,以检验以下假设:相对于 "推力","推力+"将使符合条件的人群中多 10%或更多的人受益于枪支储存计划,并且这种差异具有显著的统计学意义。研究对象包括美国密歇根州和科罗拉多州两个医疗保健系统中的 30 家儿科初级保健诊所,其中不包括非参与研究的医疗保健专业人员主要就诊地点的诊所,也不包括因资源限制而随机选择的子集。研究分析了参与研究的诊所为5至17岁青少年进行的所有儿科健康检查:干预措施:以 1:1 的比例随机分配诊所接受 nudge 或 nudge+:对患者层面的结果进行建模,以估算主要结果 "到达率"。"到达率 "是一个就诊层面的二进制指标,表示家长是否接受了枪支储存计划的两个组成部分(咨询和上锁),临床医生在电子病历中对此进行了记录。次要结果探讨了各个项目组成部分的实施情况:共有 46 597 名儿童和 368 名临床医生中的 47 307 名儿童(中位数 [IQR] 年龄为 11.3 [8.1-14.4] 岁;24 210 [51.2%] 名男性和 23 091 [48.8%] 名女性)有资格在试验期间接受枪支保管计划,并纳入分析。根据意向治疗原则,与 "劝导"(22%;95% CI,13-31)相比,"劝导+"条件下(49%;95% CI,37-61)接受枪支储存计划的儿童健康访视比例更高:在这项研究中,电子病历策略与鼓励相结合("鼓励+")与单纯的鼓励相比,能更有效地提高循证安全枪支储存计划的实施率:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04844021.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Pediatrics
JAMA Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
31.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
357
期刊介绍: JAMA Pediatrics, the oldest continuously published pediatric journal in the US since 1911, is an international peer-reviewed publication and a part of the JAMA Network. Published weekly online and in 12 issues annually, it garners over 8.4 million article views and downloads yearly. All research articles become freely accessible online after 12 months without any author fees, and through the WHO's HINARI program, the online version is accessible to institutions in developing countries. With a focus on advancing the health of infants, children, and adolescents, JAMA Pediatrics serves as a platform for discussing crucial issues and policies in child and adolescent health care. Leveraging the latest technology, it ensures timely access to information for its readers worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Systemic Postnatal Corticosteroids, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, and Survival Free of Cerebral Palsy. When Science and Politics Are Mixed. When Science and Politics Are Mixed-Reply. Systemic Corticosteroids to Prevent Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Balancing Risk and Reward. Symptom Screening for Hospitalized Pediatric Patients With Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1