An intermittent recovery test for soccer players: a validation study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16105-1
Andrea Meloni, Roberto Codella, Tommaso Arrighi, Luca Festa, Giacomo Ceci, Giacomo Faraci, Gaia Manari, Danilo Manari, Luca Filipas
{"title":"An intermittent recovery test for soccer players: a validation study.","authors":"Andrea Meloni, Roberto Codella, Tommaso Arrighi, Luca Festa, Giacomo Ceci, Giacomo Faraci, Gaia Manari, Danilo Manari, Luca Filipas","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16105-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Soccer is an intermittent team sport that demands high aerobic capacity. On field, soccer players' aerobic capacity, assessed through the maximal oxygen uptake (VO<inf>2</inf>max), is usually determined by an intermittent recovery test. The aim of this study was to obtain a construct validity of a new intermittent recovery test (IRT) with a fixed speed and a progressive decrement of rest period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five male soccer players were recruited to perform an incremental continuous test (ICT) and the new IRT, to compare their physiological data. Fifteen male soccer players were involved to perform a test-retest of IRT to assess its reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VE<inf>peak</inf>, absolute VO<inf>2</inf>max, relative VO<inf>2</inf>max and VCO<inf>2</inf>peak registered during ICT and IRT correlated strongly (Pearson's correlation coefficient ranges from 0.75 to 0.80, with very large as magnitude of effects and with P<0.001). IRT showed reliability from good to excellent regarding VE<inf>peak</inf>, absolute VO<inf>2</inf>max, relative VO<inf>2</inf>max, VCO<inf>2</inf>peak and covered distance (ICC values ranged from 0.82 to 0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings and its underlying physiological and muscular demands, suggest that IRT can be considered as a valid and reliable test to assess aerobic capacity in soccer players during the competitive period.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16105-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Soccer is an intermittent team sport that demands high aerobic capacity. On field, soccer players' aerobic capacity, assessed through the maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), is usually determined by an intermittent recovery test. The aim of this study was to obtain a construct validity of a new intermittent recovery test (IRT) with a fixed speed and a progressive decrement of rest period.

Methods: Twenty-five male soccer players were recruited to perform an incremental continuous test (ICT) and the new IRT, to compare their physiological data. Fifteen male soccer players were involved to perform a test-retest of IRT to assess its reliability.

Results: VEpeak, absolute VO2max, relative VO2max and VCO2peak registered during ICT and IRT correlated strongly (Pearson's correlation coefficient ranges from 0.75 to 0.80, with very large as magnitude of effects and with P<0.001). IRT showed reliability from good to excellent regarding VEpeak, absolute VO2max, relative VO2max, VCO2peak and covered distance (ICC values ranged from 0.82 to 0.95).

Conclusions: These findings and its underlying physiological and muscular demands, suggest that IRT can be considered as a valid and reliable test to assess aerobic capacity in soccer players during the competitive period.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
足球运动员间歇恢复测试:验证研究。
背景:足球是一项对有氧能力要求很高的间歇性团队运动。在球场上,足球运动员的有氧能力通过最大摄氧量(VO2max)来评估,通常通过间歇恢复测试来确定。本研究的目的是获得一种新的间歇恢复测试(IRT)的结构效度,该测试具有固定的速度和逐渐递减的休息时间:方法:招募 25 名男子足球运动员进行增量连续测试(ICT)和新的 IRT,以比较他们的生理数据。15名男足运动员参与了IRT的重复测试,以评估其可靠性:结果:在 ICT 和 IRT 中记录的 VEpeak、绝对 VO2max、相对 VO2max 和 VCO2peak 与 Ppeak、绝对 VO2max、相对 VO2max、VCO2peak 和覆盖距离密切相关(皮尔逊相关系数范围为 0.75 至 0.80,影响幅度非常大)(ICC 值范围为 0.82 至 0.95):这些发现及其潜在的生理和肌肉需求表明,IRT 可被视为评估足球运动员竞技期间有氧能力的有效而可靠的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
393
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Body composition asymmetry between dominant and non-dominant arms in experienced overhead throwing sports athletes. Evaluation of high altitude training camps with heart rate recovery and heart rate variability analysis: beneficial effect in elite swimmers. A reproducible, self-reported, field-based tool for monitoring ovarian hormone status and body weight variations in female athletes: the Answ'Her questionnaire. Are professional road cycling countries selecting their talents based on anthropometric characteristics which suit the countries' terrain? Differences between indoor and outdoor field cycling tests in triathletes are associated with training environment history and BMI: analysis and prediction formula.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1