Caffeine supplementation during official basketball games: a randomized crossover study on the effects on game-related statistics and perceptual responses of adult male players.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16189-0
Lorenzo Gasperi, Pierpaolo Sansone, Miguel A Gomez-Ruano, Carlos Ruiz-Moreno, Juan Del Coso
{"title":"Caffeine supplementation during official basketball games: a randomized crossover study on the effects on game-related statistics and perceptual responses of adult male players.","authors":"Lorenzo Gasperi, Pierpaolo Sansone, Miguel A Gomez-Ruano, Carlos Ruiz-Moreno, Juan Del Coso","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16189-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examined the effects of caffeine (CAF) supplementation on game-related statistics and perceptual responses of male basketball players during official games.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight players (23.5±5.7 years) participated in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover study. Sixty minutes before the start of each game, players ingested a dose of either CAF (3 mg/kg body mass) or placebo (PLA) in a randomized order. Game-related statistics were collected. After the games, players reported ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and their perceptions of endurance and power. Separate linear mixed models evaluated the effects of treatment (CAF, PLA), game location (home, away), and opponent level (better, worse) on game-related statistics and perceptual responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Players committed fewer fouls when taking CAF compared to PLA (P<0.001, ES=0.75, moderate). No effects of CAF were found for the other game-related statistics (all P>0.05). RPE was higher in CAF compared to PLA (P=0.031, ES: 0.49, small). There were no differences in perceptions of endurance (P=0.388) or power (P=0.988). No effects of game location or opponent level were found for game-related statistics or perceptual responses (all P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that caffeine supplementation can improve defensive performance in semiprofessional basketball players while also possibly increasing physical performances, seen the higher RPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":" ","pages":"1172-1178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16189-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study examined the effects of caffeine (CAF) supplementation on game-related statistics and perceptual responses of male basketball players during official games.

Methods: Eight players (23.5±5.7 years) participated in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover study. Sixty minutes before the start of each game, players ingested a dose of either CAF (3 mg/kg body mass) or placebo (PLA) in a randomized order. Game-related statistics were collected. After the games, players reported ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and their perceptions of endurance and power. Separate linear mixed models evaluated the effects of treatment (CAF, PLA), game location (home, away), and opponent level (better, worse) on game-related statistics and perceptual responses.

Results: Players committed fewer fouls when taking CAF compared to PLA (P<0.001, ES=0.75, moderate). No effects of CAF were found for the other game-related statistics (all P>0.05). RPE was higher in CAF compared to PLA (P=0.031, ES: 0.49, small). There were no differences in perceptions of endurance (P=0.388) or power (P=0.988). No effects of game location or opponent level were found for game-related statistics or perceptual responses (all P>0.05).

Conclusions: This study suggests that caffeine supplementation can improve defensive performance in semiprofessional basketball players while also possibly increasing physical performances, seen the higher RPE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在正式篮球比赛期间补充咖啡因:关于对成年男性球员比赛相关统计数据和知觉反应影响的随机交叉研究。
研究背景本研究探讨了在正式比赛中补充咖啡因(CAF)对男子篮球运动员比赛相关统计数据和知觉反应的影响:八名球员(23.5±5.7 岁)参加了这项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机交叉研究。每场比赛开始前 60 分钟,球员按随机顺序摄入一定剂量的 CAF(3 毫克/千克体重)或安慰剂(PLA)。收集了与比赛相关的统计数据。比赛结束后,运动员报告了他们的体力感知评分(RPE)以及他们对耐力和力量的感知。单独的线性混合模型评估了治疗(CAF、PLA)、比赛地点(主场、客场)和对手水平(更好、更差)对比赛相关统计数据和感知反应的影响:与 PLA 相比,服用 CAF 的球员犯规次数更少(P0.05)。与 PLA 相比,CAF 的 RPE 更高(P=0.031,ES:0.49,小)。对耐力(P=0.388)或力量(P=0.988)的感知没有差异。没有发现比赛地点或对手水平会影响与比赛相关的统计数据或感知反应(均为 P>0.05):本研究表明,补充咖啡因可提高半职业篮球运动员的防守表现,同时还可能提高体能表现,这一点在较高的 RPE 中可见一斑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
393
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Hormonal response during official bouldering competition. Training load, sleep, reaction time, sports performance, and mood in paralympic swimmers before a competition. Influence of competitive padel matches on physical fitness and perceptual responses in high-level players. Artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms in diagnosis and therapy of the ankle joint. Cortisol and insulin behaviors during an ultramarathon event: are they real markers of extreme exertion?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1