The impact of trial inclusion criteria on outcomes in DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP in the first line: a Danish nationwide study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Leukemia & Lymphoma Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1080/10428194.2024.2390561
Mikkel Runason Simonsen, Laura Mors Haunstrup, Freja Tang Severinsen, Rasmus Kuhr Jensen, Peter de Nully Brown, Matthew J Maurer, Arushi Khurana, Paw Jensen, Judit Mészáros Jørgensen, Thomas Stauffer Larsen, Michael Roost Clausen, Christian Bjørn Poulsen, Andriette Dessau-Arp, Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly, Lasse Hjort Jakobsen
{"title":"The impact of trial inclusion criteria on outcomes in DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP in the first line: a Danish nationwide study.","authors":"Mikkel Runason Simonsen, Laura Mors Haunstrup, Freja Tang Severinsen, Rasmus Kuhr Jensen, Peter de Nully Brown, Matthew J Maurer, Arushi Khurana, Paw Jensen, Judit Mészáros Jørgensen, Thomas Stauffer Larsen, Michael Roost Clausen, Christian Bjørn Poulsen, Andriette Dessau-Arp, Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly, Lasse Hjort Jakobsen","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2024.2390561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Up to 50% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients are ineligible for participation in clinical trials. Ineligible patients have inferior outcomes, but less is known about the impact of commonly used organ-function-based inclusion criteria on drug efficacy estimates. Data on DLBCL patients treated with CHOP+/-rituximab were retrieved from the Danish Lymphoma Registry. Trial inclusion criteria were extracted from four international DLBCL trials (REMoDL-B, GOYA, POLARIX, and HOVON-84). Differences in overall survival (OS) and 5-year restricted mean survival differences (5 y-RMSDs) between trial eligible and ineligible patients were computed. The effectiveness of adding rituximab to CHOP was quantified by the 5 y-RMSD between CHOP and R-CHOP-treated patients and the impact of individual trial criteria on estimated effectiveness was quantified by Shapley-values. In total, 4,083 R-CHOP-treated and 890 CHOP-treated DLBCL patients were included. Across the trials, 18.6-29.3% of the included R-CHOP-treated patients were deemed ineligible for trial based on organ function and performance status alone. Ineligible patients had significantly worse survival, with adjusted absolute differences in 5-year OS of 9-15%. The impact of individual criteria on the estimated effectiveness of adding rituximab to CHOP was small (Shapley-value range, -2.74-0.31). Using a smaller set of criteria derived from a data-driven approach, the number of eligible patients increased by 16-38% and the 5 y-RMSD increased by 0.7-3.1 months. In conclusion, OS among trial ineligible DLBCL patients is inferior as expected, but relaxing trial criteria would have increased the number of trial participants without making major changes in estimated efficacy for a hypothetical CHOP versus R-CHOP trial. This does not necessarily imply that trial findings based on selected patients are unreliable, as the estimated effectiveness of adding rituximab to CHOP was only slightly affected by omitting selected inclusion criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2390561","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Up to 50% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients are ineligible for participation in clinical trials. Ineligible patients have inferior outcomes, but less is known about the impact of commonly used organ-function-based inclusion criteria on drug efficacy estimates. Data on DLBCL patients treated with CHOP+/-rituximab were retrieved from the Danish Lymphoma Registry. Trial inclusion criteria were extracted from four international DLBCL trials (REMoDL-B, GOYA, POLARIX, and HOVON-84). Differences in overall survival (OS) and 5-year restricted mean survival differences (5 y-RMSDs) between trial eligible and ineligible patients were computed. The effectiveness of adding rituximab to CHOP was quantified by the 5 y-RMSD between CHOP and R-CHOP-treated patients and the impact of individual trial criteria on estimated effectiveness was quantified by Shapley-values. In total, 4,083 R-CHOP-treated and 890 CHOP-treated DLBCL patients were included. Across the trials, 18.6-29.3% of the included R-CHOP-treated patients were deemed ineligible for trial based on organ function and performance status alone. Ineligible patients had significantly worse survival, with adjusted absolute differences in 5-year OS of 9-15%. The impact of individual criteria on the estimated effectiveness of adding rituximab to CHOP was small (Shapley-value range, -2.74-0.31). Using a smaller set of criteria derived from a data-driven approach, the number of eligible patients increased by 16-38% and the 5 y-RMSD increased by 0.7-3.1 months. In conclusion, OS among trial ineligible DLBCL patients is inferior as expected, but relaxing trial criteria would have increased the number of trial participants without making major changes in estimated efficacy for a hypothetical CHOP versus R-CHOP trial. This does not necessarily imply that trial findings based on selected patients are unreliable, as the estimated effectiveness of adding rituximab to CHOP was only slightly affected by omitting selected inclusion criteria.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
试验纳入标准对接受 R-CHOP 一线治疗的 DLBCL 患者预后的影响:一项丹麦全国性研究。
多达50%的弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者不符合参与临床试验的条件。不符合条件的患者预后较差,但人们对常用的基于器官功能的纳入标准对药物疗效估计的影响知之甚少。我们从丹麦淋巴瘤登记处获取了接受CHOP+/-利妥昔单抗治疗的DLBCL患者的数据。试验纳入标准摘自四项国际 DLBCL 试验(REMoDL-B、GOYA、POLARIX 和 HOVON-84)。计算了符合试验条件和不符合试验条件的患者的总生存期(OS)差异和5年限制性平均生存期差异(5 y-RMSDs)。在CHOP基础上加用利妥昔单抗的有效性通过CHOP和R-CHOP治疗患者之间的5年限制性平均存活率差异进行量化,个别试验标准对估计有效性的影响通过Shapley值进行量化。总共纳入了4083例R-CHOP治疗和890例CHOP治疗的DLBCL患者。在所有试验中,18.6%-29.3%的R-CHOP治疗患者仅根据器官功能和表现状态就被认为不符合试验条件。不符合条件的患者生存率明显较差,调整后的5年OS绝对差异为9%-15%。个别标准对在CHOP基础上加用利妥昔单抗的估计疗效影响很小(Shapley值范围为-2.74-0.31)。采用数据驱动法得出的一套较小的标准,符合条件的患者人数增加了16%-38%,5年RMSD增加了0.7-3.1个月。总之,不符合试验条件的DLBCL患者的OS不如预期,但放宽试验标准会增加试验参与者的数量,而不会使假设的CHOP与R-CHOP试验的估计疗效发生重大变化。这并不一定意味着基于选定患者的试验结果是不可靠的,因为在CHOP基础上加用利妥昔单抗的估计疗效只受到省略选定纳入标准的轻微影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Leukemia & Lymphoma
Leukemia & Lymphoma 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
384
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor
期刊最新文献
Thromboprophylaxis with intermediate dose enoxaparin during asparaginase containing induction for young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Vaccination strategies for patients with lymphoma treated in early lines of therapies: a real-world practice survey among Fondazione Italiana Linfomi centers. The interplay of knowledge, motivation, and treatment response in medication adherence among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with Imatinib. CD274 structural variants for guiding treatment with PD-1 blockade in a patient with relapsed/refractory chronic active EBV transformed to NK lymphoma. A novel murine syngeneic CD8 peripheral T-cell lymphoma model with preclinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1