Leukemia & Lymphoma最新文献

Treatment modifications adopted during pandemic aimed at reducing infection, myelosuppression, and optimizing hospital resources. This study evaluated outcomes for pediatric patients with ALL who had treatment modifications during pandemic compared to historical cohorts at the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt. Bi-directional cohort study included 378 patients. Treatment modifications included omission of specific drugs or adjusting chemotherapy schedules to 6-mercaptopurine/methotrexate. Median follow-up were 45.1 and 43.2 months, for cohorts (A) and (B), respectively. The three-year overall survival were 84.9% and 87.5% (p = .48) and three-year relapse free survival were 82.8% and 86.5% (p = .11) for cohorts (A) and (B), respectively. Infection-related mortality was 11% and 4.4% for cohorts (A) and (B), respectively (p = .03). Treatment modifications adopted during the pandemic did not adversely affect the outcome of patients with ALL and notably reduced infection-related deaths. Longer follow-up is warranted to validate these findings.

To determine the optimal variation in SUVlbm via ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging between the baseline and interim stages, and assess early response among patients with extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL) of 5-DS score ≥ 4, 20 patients after four cycles of chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled and received re-biopsy targeting PET-positive residual masses. The optimal cutoff value for evaluating early response assessment was 66.75% for ΔSUVlbm%, with the area under curve of 0.985. All patients with a 5-DS score of 4 exhibited negative results upon re-biopsy. During follow-up, the median PFS of patients characterized by ΔSUVlbm% ≥66.75% and <66.75% were unreached and 10 months, respectively. Utilizing ΔSUVlbm% between baseline and interim ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans can effectively identify a subset of patients who were visually analyzed as false positives(5-DS ≥ 4), which was confirmed by interim biopsy results, thus serving as a crucial indicator for early assessment of treatment outcomes in patients with ENKTCL.

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) and venetoclax (VEN) are commonly used in patients with IDH-mutated (IDHm) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for induction chemotherapy. While prior studies demonstrated high response and survival rates with HMA/VEN in IDHm AML, the impact of treatment modifications in real-world settings is unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 89 IDHm AML patients treated with HMA/VEN from January 2018 to June 2023. CR/CRi rates were 76% in newly diagnosed (ND) and 55% in relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients, and median overall survival was 29.2 months (ND) and 17.1 months (R/R), respectively. Treatment modifications were common. Early VEN reductions were associated with lower response rates but not worse survival. Prolonged cycles were not associated with worse response rates or survival. Significant neutropenia and ED visits or unplanned hospitalizations were considerable before and after CR/CRi, though febrile neutropenia decreased afterward. HMA/VEN is efficacious, with treatment modifications not affecting survival, though long-term toxicities are notable.

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of allogeneic, ex-vivo expanded, NK cells, MG4101, in patients with refractory or relapsed AML. The relationship between immunological characteristics and clinical responses was analyzed. Between April 2018 and February 2020, 11 patients (male:female = 5:6) were treated with MG4101. Of eight evaluable patients, two (25.0%) showed partial response and two (25.0%) showed stable disease. The median overall survival was 3.4 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.5-4.3 months), and the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) censored duration of response was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.5-4.4 months). Two patients underwent HSCT after MG4101 treatment. Except for one grade 3 infusion-related reaction, no serious adverse events were observed. The sum of activating KIRs in responders tended to be higher than that in non-responders. Analyses of NKRL and KIR highlighted the importance of immunological mechanisms in treating myeloid neoplasms.

The prognosis of adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has improved in the last decades. This has been due to the sum of several factors including more precise recognition of the ALL subtypes, refinement of the assessment of prognostic factors, improvement in pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimens and especially to the incorporation of novel targeted and immune therapeutics, as well as engineered cellular therapies, among others. These therapies were initially developed for relapsed or refractory patients but are now being incorporated into frontline treatment and represent a major step forward in ALL therapy. This review focuses on the recent advances in ALL characterization and especially on the treatment of ALL in adults.

In the absence of head-to-head randomized trials, unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were conducted to estimate the relative efficacy of zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib and zanubrutinib versus rituximab in relapsed or refractory marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Logistic propensity score models were used to estimate weights for the patient-level data from two phase II single-arm trials, MAGNOLIA and BGB-3111-AU-003, such that their characteristics matched the ibrutinib and rituximab aggregate-level data from PCYC-1121 and CHRONOS-3, respectively. The base case model for each comparison incorporated four key prognostic factors: prior lines of therapy, MZL subtype, response to prior therapy, and age. A sensitivity analysis incorporating additional prognostic factors was also conducted for the ibrutinib comparison. The impact of each covariate was explored via a leave-one-out analysis. Compared with ibrutinib and rituximab, zanubrutinib demonstrated significant benefits in terms of both overall response and progression-free survival in patients with previously treated MZL.