Evaluating the Impact of Gender and Race on Otolaryngology Resident Experiences Across the United States.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1002/ohn.966
Shweta Lodha, Nathan Luzum, Claire Washabaugh, Ariana Allen, Sandra Stinnett, Charles Woodard, Sharon Fekrat
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Gender and Race on Otolaryngology Resident Experiences Across the United States.","authors":"Shweta Lodha, Nathan Luzum, Claire Washabaugh, Ariana Allen, Sandra Stinnett, Charles Woodard, Sharon Fekrat","doi":"10.1002/ohn.966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Otolaryngology residents often encounter work-related stress and challenges during training. Sociodemographic factors influence experiences during residency; however, the impact of race and gender on otolaryngology trainee well-being during residency remains understudied.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Online survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>US residency programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey consisting of 59 multiple-choice questions was sent to 104 directors of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education otolaryngology residency programs to distribute to residents. Respondents were queried regarding demographics and experiences with bias. Residents self-identified gender and race. Black, Hispanic/Latinx, Middle Eastern/North African, and multiracial residents were categorized as underrepresented minorities (URM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one US otolaryngology residents responded to the survey, the majority of whom were women (60.7%) and white (62%). Many residents endorsed a belief that receipt of research and training opportunities was negatively impacted by bias due to race (29.5%) or gender (45.9%). More women (27%) than men (13%) reported maximal burnout, and fewer men (17.4%) than women (40.5%) expressed low confidence in ability to independently care for patients. More male (47.8%) and white (31.6%) residents strongly agreed they were thriving. 94.6% of women and 33.3% of URM residents reported being mistaken for a nonphysician, compared to 0% of white male respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Otolaryngology residents perceived differential treatment based on race and gender, with women and URM residents experiencing greater exclusion and bias, as well as increased misidentification and decreased ability to thrive. Future work includes increasing sample size for generalizability and developing interventions that uphold equity in residency training environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"144-151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Otolaryngology residents often encounter work-related stress and challenges during training. Sociodemographic factors influence experiences during residency; however, the impact of race and gender on otolaryngology trainee well-being during residency remains understudied.

Study design: Online survey.

Setting: US residency programs.

Methods: An anonymous online survey consisting of 59 multiple-choice questions was sent to 104 directors of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education otolaryngology residency programs to distribute to residents. Respondents were queried regarding demographics and experiences with bias. Residents self-identified gender and race. Black, Hispanic/Latinx, Middle Eastern/North African, and multiracial residents were categorized as underrepresented minorities (URM).

Results: Sixty-one US otolaryngology residents responded to the survey, the majority of whom were women (60.7%) and white (62%). Many residents endorsed a belief that receipt of research and training opportunities was negatively impacted by bias due to race (29.5%) or gender (45.9%). More women (27%) than men (13%) reported maximal burnout, and fewer men (17.4%) than women (40.5%) expressed low confidence in ability to independently care for patients. More male (47.8%) and white (31.6%) residents strongly agreed they were thriving. 94.6% of women and 33.3% of URM residents reported being mistaken for a nonphysician, compared to 0% of white male respondents.

Conclusion: Otolaryngology residents perceived differential treatment based on race and gender, with women and URM residents experiencing greater exclusion and bias, as well as increased misidentification and decreased ability to thrive. Future work includes increasing sample size for generalizability and developing interventions that uphold equity in residency training environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估性别和种族对美国耳鼻喉科住院医师经历的影响。
目的:耳鼻喉科住院医师在培训期间经常会遇到与工作相关的压力和挑战。社会人口因素会影响住院医师培训期间的经历;然而,种族和性别对耳鼻喉科住院医师培训期间的幸福感的影响仍未得到充分研究:研究设计:在线调查:研究设计:在线调查:向104名美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会耳鼻喉科住院医师培训项目的负责人发送了一份匿名在线调查,其中包括59道选择题。调查询问了受访者的人口统计学特征和遭受偏见的经历。住院医师对性别和种族进行了自我认同。黑人、西班牙裔/拉丁裔、中东裔/北非裔和多种族住院医师被归类为代表性不足的少数群体(URM):61名美国耳鼻喉科住院医师对调查做出了回复,其中大部分为女性(60.7%)和白人(62%)。许多住院医师认为,由于种族(29.5%)或性别(45.9%)的偏见,获得研究和培训机会受到了负面影响。报告最大职业倦怠的女性(27%)多于男性(13%),对独立护理病人的能力信心不足的男性(17.4%)少于女性(40.5%)。更多的男性(47.8%)和白人(31.6%)住院医师强烈认为他们的生活充满希望。94.6%的女性和33.3%的统招住院医师表示曾被误认为是非医生,而白人男性受访者的这一比例为0%:结论:耳鼻喉科住院医师感受到了基于种族和性别的不同待遇,女性和统招住院医师经历了更大的排斥和偏见,以及更多的误认和更低的茁壮成长能力。今后的工作包括扩大样本量以提高普遍性,以及制定干预措施以维护住院医师培训环境的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
期刊最新文献
Health-State Utility Values in Patients Affected by Flaccid and Non-Flaccid Facial Paralysis. Class III Congenital Middle Ear Anomalies: Refining the Teunissen-Cremers Classification Based on Stapes Suprastructure Viability. Nasal Corticosteroid Delivery Methods in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyps: A Systematic Review. Congenital Pyriform Aperture Stenosis: Not All Patients Require Open Repair. Time-Driven Activity Based Costing of an Annual Canadian Cochlear Implant Program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1