Bastien A Valencia-Sanchez, Murray J Bartho, Elise Krippaehne, Jess C Mace, Myriam Loyo
{"title":"Health-State Utility Values in Patients Affected by Flaccid and Non-Flaccid Facial Paralysis.","authors":"Bastien A Valencia-Sanchez, Murray J Bartho, Elise Krippaehne, Jess C Mace, Myriam Loyo","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary goal of this study was to measure health-state utility values (HUVs) in patients with facial paralysis before and after treatment. A secondary objective was to compare these values with those of other chronic diseases and currently available treatments.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with flaccid and non-flaccid facial paralysis were included. Baseline demographics, medical comorbidities, facial paralysis history, treatment details, and disease-specific quality-of-life scores were collected. Utility values were derived using the Short-Form 6D health index at baseline and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean baseline Short-Form 6D utility value for patients with facial paralysis (n = 134) was 0.73 (± 0.14) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.75). Baseline utility values significantly correlated with disease-specific quality of life as measured by the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale (r = 0.400; P < .001), but not with Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale or Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire scores. Post-treatment utility values showed a mean improvement of 0.03 (95% CI: -0.01 to 0.08; P = .14) in the overall cohort. The flaccid group showed a greater average improvement compared to the non-flaccid group (0.05 [± 0.17] vs 0.02 [± 0.17]; P = .62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with flaccid and non-flaccid facial paralysis reported HUVs that were significantly lower than the US population norm. Treatment improved utility values in both groups. These findings provide initial data for future cost-effectiveness analyses of surgical and non-surgical treatment options for facial paralysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The primary goal of this study was to measure health-state utility values (HUVs) in patients with facial paralysis before and after treatment. A secondary objective was to compare these values with those of other chronic diseases and currently available treatments.
Study design: A retrospective chart review.
Setting: A tertiary medical center.
Methods: Adults with flaccid and non-flaccid facial paralysis were included. Baseline demographics, medical comorbidities, facial paralysis history, treatment details, and disease-specific quality-of-life scores were collected. Utility values were derived using the Short-Form 6D health index at baseline and after treatment.
Results: The mean baseline Short-Form 6D utility value for patients with facial paralysis (n = 134) was 0.73 (± 0.14) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.75). Baseline utility values significantly correlated with disease-specific quality of life as measured by the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale (r = 0.400; P < .001), but not with Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale or Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire scores. Post-treatment utility values showed a mean improvement of 0.03 (95% CI: -0.01 to 0.08; P = .14) in the overall cohort. The flaccid group showed a greater average improvement compared to the non-flaccid group (0.05 [± 0.17] vs 0.02 [± 0.17]; P = .62).
Conclusion: Patients with flaccid and non-flaccid facial paralysis reported HUVs that were significantly lower than the US population norm. Treatment improved utility values in both groups. These findings provide initial data for future cost-effectiveness analyses of surgical and non-surgical treatment options for facial paralysis.
期刊介绍:
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.