MRI Predicts Residual Disease and Outcomes in Watch-and-Wait Patients with Rectal Cancer.

IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1148/radiol.232748
Hannah Williams, Dana M Omer, Hannah M Thompson, Sabrina T Lin, Floris S Verheij, Joao Miranda, Jonathan B Yuval, James Buckley, Michael R Marco, Li-Xuan Qin, David A Dombroski, Rajendra Kedar, Aytekin Oto, Elena Korngold, Joseph C Veniero, Sunil Gandhi, Arun Krishnaraj, Minal Jagtiani, Kirk Ohanian, Dan Vu, Thomas A Hope, Sonia Lee, Ashish P Wasnik, Nikhil Madhuripan, Marc J Gollub, Julio Garcia-Aguilar
{"title":"MRI Predicts Residual Disease and Outcomes in Watch-and-Wait Patients with Rectal Cancer.","authors":"Hannah Williams, Dana M Omer, Hannah M Thompson, Sabrina T Lin, Floris S Verheij, Joao Miranda, Jonathan B Yuval, James Buckley, Michael R Marco, Li-Xuan Qin, David A Dombroski, Rajendra Kedar, Aytekin Oto, Elena Korngold, Joseph C Veniero, Sunil Gandhi, Arun Krishnaraj, Minal Jagtiani, Kirk Ohanian, Dan Vu, Thomas A Hope, Sonia Lee, Ashish P Wasnik, Nikhil Madhuripan, Marc J Gollub, Julio Garcia-Aguilar","doi":"10.1148/radiol.232748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background MRI plays a crucial role in restaging locally advanced rectal cancer treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT); however, prospective studies have not evaluated its ability to accurately select patients for nonoperative management. Purpose To evaluate the ability of restaging MRI to predict oncologic outcomes and identify imaging features associated with residual disease (RD) after TNT. Materials and Methods This was a secondary analysis of the Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma (OPRA) trial, which randomized participants from April 2014 to March 2020 with stages II or III rectal adenocarcinoma to undergo either induction or consolidation TNT. Participants enrolled in the OPRA trial who underwent restaging MRI were eligible for inclusion in the present study. Radiologists classified participants as having clinical complete response (cCR), near-complete clinical response (nCR), or incomplete clinical response (iCR) based on restaging MRI at a mean of 8 weeks ± 4 (SD) after treatment. Oncologic outcomes according to MRI response category were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify imaging characteristics associated with RD. Results A total of 277 participants (median age, 58 years [IQR, 17 years]; 179 male) who were randomized in the OPRA trial had restaging MRI forms completed. The median follow-up duration was 4.1 years. Participants with cCR had higher rates of organ preservation compared with those with nCR (65.3% vs 41.6%, log-rank <i>P</i> < .001). Five-year disease-free survival for participants with cCR, nCR, and iCR was 81.8%, 67.6%, and 49.6%, respectively (log-rank <i>P</i> < .001). The MRI response category also predicted overall survival (log-rank <i>P</i> < .001), distant recurrence-free survival (log-rank <i>P</i> = .005), and local regrowth (log-rank <i>P</i> = .02). Among the 266 participants with at least 2 years of follow-up, 129 (48.5%) had RD. At multivariable analysis, the presence of restricted diffusion (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% CI: 1.22, 5.24) and abnormal nodal morphologic features (odds ratio, 5.04; 95% CI: 1.43, 23.9) remained independently associated with RD. Conclusion The MRI response category was predictive of organ preservation and survival. Restricted diffusion and abnormal nodal morphologic features on restaging MRI scans were associated with increased likelihood of residual tumor. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02008656 © RSNA, 2024 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Milot in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.232748","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background MRI plays a crucial role in restaging locally advanced rectal cancer treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT); however, prospective studies have not evaluated its ability to accurately select patients for nonoperative management. Purpose To evaluate the ability of restaging MRI to predict oncologic outcomes and identify imaging features associated with residual disease (RD) after TNT. Materials and Methods This was a secondary analysis of the Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma (OPRA) trial, which randomized participants from April 2014 to March 2020 with stages II or III rectal adenocarcinoma to undergo either induction or consolidation TNT. Participants enrolled in the OPRA trial who underwent restaging MRI were eligible for inclusion in the present study. Radiologists classified participants as having clinical complete response (cCR), near-complete clinical response (nCR), or incomplete clinical response (iCR) based on restaging MRI at a mean of 8 weeks ± 4 (SD) after treatment. Oncologic outcomes according to MRI response category were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify imaging characteristics associated with RD. Results A total of 277 participants (median age, 58 years [IQR, 17 years]; 179 male) who were randomized in the OPRA trial had restaging MRI forms completed. The median follow-up duration was 4.1 years. Participants with cCR had higher rates of organ preservation compared with those with nCR (65.3% vs 41.6%, log-rank P < .001). Five-year disease-free survival for participants with cCR, nCR, and iCR was 81.8%, 67.6%, and 49.6%, respectively (log-rank P < .001). The MRI response category also predicted overall survival (log-rank P < .001), distant recurrence-free survival (log-rank P = .005), and local regrowth (log-rank P = .02). Among the 266 participants with at least 2 years of follow-up, 129 (48.5%) had RD. At multivariable analysis, the presence of restricted diffusion (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% CI: 1.22, 5.24) and abnormal nodal morphologic features (odds ratio, 5.04; 95% CI: 1.43, 23.9) remained independently associated with RD. Conclusion The MRI response category was predictive of organ preservation and survival. Restricted diffusion and abnormal nodal morphologic features on restaging MRI scans were associated with increased likelihood of residual tumor. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02008656 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Milot in this issue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磁共振成像预测直肠癌患者的残留病灶和预后
背景 MRI 在对接受全新药辅助治疗 (TNT) 的局部晚期直肠癌进行重新分期方面发挥着重要作用;然而,前瞻性研究尚未评估其准确选择患者接受非手术治疗的能力。目的 评估 MRI 重分期预测肿瘤预后的能力,并确定与 TNT 后残留疾病(RD)相关的影像学特征。材料与方法 这是直肠腺癌器官保留(OPRA)试验的一项二次分析,该试验在 2014 年 4 月至 2020 年 3 月期间对 II 期或 III 期直肠腺癌患者进行随机分组,让他们接受诱导或巩固 TNT 治疗。参加 OPRA 试验并接受磁共振成像重分期的参与者符合纳入本研究的条件。根据治疗后平均 8 周 ± 4 (SD) 的磁共振成像重分期结果,放射科医生将参与者分为临床完全应答 (cCR)、临床接近完全应答 (nCR) 或临床不完全应答 (iCR)。使用卡普兰-梅耶曲线评估根据磁共振成像反应类别得出的肿瘤学结果。进行逻辑回归分析以确定与RD相关的影像学特征。结果 在 OPRA 试验中,共有 277 名随机参与者(中位年龄 58 岁 [IQR,17 岁];179 名男性)填写了 MRI 重分期表。中位随访时间为 4.1 年。与nCR患者相比,cCR患者的器官保留率更高(65.3% vs 41.6%,log-rank P < .001)。cCR、nCR和iCR患者的五年无病生存率分别为81.8%、67.6%和49.6%(对数秩P < .001)。MRI 反应类别还能预测总生存率(对数秩 P < .001)、无远处复发生存率(对数秩 P = .005)和局部再生率(对数秩 P = .02)。在随访至少 2 年的 266 名参与者中,129 人(48.5%)患有 RD。在多变量分析中,弥散受限(几率比为 2.50;95% CI:1.22, 5.24)和结节形态特征异常(几率比为 5.04;95% CI:1.43, 23.9)仍与 RD 独立相关。结论 MRI 反应类别可预测器官保存和生存率。重新分期的 MRI 扫描中弥散受限和结节形态特征异常与肿瘤残留可能性增加有关。ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02008656 © RSNA, 2024 本文有补充材料。另请参阅本期Milot的社论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology
Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
35.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
596
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies. Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.
期刊最新文献
Amplifying Research in Radiology: The Podcast Effect. Amplifying Research: The Potential for Podcasts to Boost Radiology Journal Article Exposure. Automated Interstitial Lung Abnormality Probability Prediction at CT: A Stepwise Machine Learning Approach in the Boston Lung Cancer Study. Biomarkers for Personalized Neoadjuvant Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Moving Forward. Calcified Osteosarcoma Lung Metastases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1