[Measurement and evaluation of personal attenuation rating before and after the training of the noise-exposed workers wearing foam earplugs].

J Liu, X Wang, R Zhang, Y H Bao, K F Gu, L P Pan
{"title":"[Measurement and evaluation of personal attenuation rating before and after the training of the noise-exposed workers wearing foam earplugs].","authors":"J Liu, X Wang, R Zhang, Y H Bao, K F Gu, L P Pan","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20230817-00033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To measure and compare the difference of personal attenuation rating (PAR) of the workers wearing foam earplugs before and after the training, and to evaluate the effect of ear protector wearing training on the noise protection. <b>Methods:</b> In February 2023, 94 workers exposed to noise in a machinery manufacturing factory were selected as subjects. The production noise in the workplace was measured and subjects were trained to wear earplugs. The PAR values of wearing 3M 1110 foam test earplugs were measured and recorded before and after the training by using the fit testing of hearing protection device. The differences between the actual PAR values with nominal values and the noise attenuation values in related standards were compared, and the protective effect of hearing protection device before and after training was evaluated. <b>Results:</b> The average age of the subjects was (36.76±11.48) years old, the average length of service was (16.34±11.64) years, and the average exposure time to noise was (15.67±11.64) years. The noise detection results of the subjects' posts were ranged from 80.1 to 94.3 dB (A). The results of subjects wore 3M 1110 foam test earplugs for fit testing showed that the binaural PAR value after training was (19.3±6.4) dB (A), which was significantly higher than that before training (11.1±7.4) dB (A) (<i>t</i>=13.31, <i>P</i><0.001). After training, 11 people (11.70%) could reach the corrected noise reduction value (NRR value), 26 people (27.66%) could reach the standard of single noise reduction value (SNR value) ×0.6, and 84 people (89.36%) could reach the standard of (NRR-7) /2. The under protection rate of hearing protectors after training (7.45%) was significantly lower than that before training (45.74%), and the difference of different protection levels before and after training was statistically significant (χ(2)=40.83, <i>P</i><0.001) . <b>Conclusion:</b> It is suggested that enterprises should use the fit testing instead of nominal value estimation to evaluate the noise reduction effect of hearing protection device. Special training on the selection and use of hearing protection device should be strengthened, so as to ensure that workers wear them correctly and improve the protective effect of hearing protection device.</p>","PeriodicalId":23958,"journal":{"name":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","volume":"42 8","pages":"589-593"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20230817-00033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To measure and compare the difference of personal attenuation rating (PAR) of the workers wearing foam earplugs before and after the training, and to evaluate the effect of ear protector wearing training on the noise protection. Methods: In February 2023, 94 workers exposed to noise in a machinery manufacturing factory were selected as subjects. The production noise in the workplace was measured and subjects were trained to wear earplugs. The PAR values of wearing 3M 1110 foam test earplugs were measured and recorded before and after the training by using the fit testing of hearing protection device. The differences between the actual PAR values with nominal values and the noise attenuation values in related standards were compared, and the protective effect of hearing protection device before and after training was evaluated. Results: The average age of the subjects was (36.76±11.48) years old, the average length of service was (16.34±11.64) years, and the average exposure time to noise was (15.67±11.64) years. The noise detection results of the subjects' posts were ranged from 80.1 to 94.3 dB (A). The results of subjects wore 3M 1110 foam test earplugs for fit testing showed that the binaural PAR value after training was (19.3±6.4) dB (A), which was significantly higher than that before training (11.1±7.4) dB (A) (t=13.31, P<0.001). After training, 11 people (11.70%) could reach the corrected noise reduction value (NRR value), 26 people (27.66%) could reach the standard of single noise reduction value (SNR value) ×0.6, and 84 people (89.36%) could reach the standard of (NRR-7) /2. The under protection rate of hearing protectors after training (7.45%) was significantly lower than that before training (45.74%), and the difference of different protection levels before and after training was statistically significant (χ(2)=40.83, P<0.001) . Conclusion: It is suggested that enterprises should use the fit testing instead of nominal value estimation to evaluate the noise reduction effect of hearing protection device. Special training on the selection and use of hearing protection device should be strengthened, so as to ensure that workers wear them correctly and improve the protective effect of hearing protection device.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[测量和评估佩戴泡沫耳塞的受噪声影响工人在培训前后的个人衰减等级]。
目的测量和比较佩戴泡沫耳塞的工人在培训前后个人衰减等级(PAR)的差异,并评估佩戴护耳器培训对噪声防护的影响。研究方法2023 年 2 月,在一家机械制造厂选取了 94 名暴露于噪声的工人作为研究对象。测量了工作场所的生产噪声,并对受试者进行了佩戴耳塞的培训。通过使用听力保护装置的密合度测试,测量并记录了培训前后佩戴 3M 1110 泡沫测试耳塞的 PAR 值。比较了实际 PAR 值与标称值以及相关标准中的噪声衰减值之间的差异,并评估了培训前后听力保护装置的保护效果。结果受试者的平均年龄为(36.76±11.48)岁,平均工龄为(16.34±11.64)年,平均接触噪声时间为(15.67±11.64)年。受试者岗位的噪声检测结果介于 80.1 至 94.3 dB (A) 之间。受试者佩戴 3M 1110 发泡测试耳塞进行密合度测试的结果显示,培训后的双耳 PAR 值为(19.3±6.4) dB (A),显著高于培训前的(11.1±7.4) dB (A)(t=13.31,PPConclusion):建议企业使用密合度测试代替标称值估算来评估听力保护装置的降噪效果。应加强听力保护装置选择和使用的专门培训,确保工人正确佩戴,提高听力保护装置的保护效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9764
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[4 cases of occupational lung cancer caused by chloromethyl ether and dichloromethyl ether in a chemical enterprise]. [A case of acute pulmonary edema caused by exertional heat stroke]. [A case report of pulmonary aspergillosis secondary to occupational chronic formaldehyde toxic obstructive pulmonary disease]. [A meta-analysis of the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among rehabilitation therapists]. [A meta-analysis of the relationship between overtime work and neck musculoskeletal disorders in Chinese occupational population].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1