Experiences of siblings of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-24-00043
Yuta Koto, Masami Tanaka, Shingo Ueki, Kazuteru Niinomi
{"title":"Experiences of siblings of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Yuta Koto, Masami Tanaka, Shingo Ueki, Kazuteru Niinomi","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review is to explore the experiences of siblings of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With improved life expectancy of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities, the research focus is on care at home and in the community. Although parents are the primary caregivers, siblings often assume the role of young caregivers, bearing the weight of caregiving responsibilities. Thus, a synthesis of qualitative findings is required regarding their experiences to facilitate the development of effective support strategies.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Siblings of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities will be included, defined as children with an IQ of ≤40 or mental development below a 2-year-old's level, coupled with an inability to walk independently. Disabled children aged <20 years will be included. There will be no restrictions on the siblings' age or type of relationship. Qualitative studies on experiences, caregiving burdens, challenges, difficulties, and frustration in daily life will be considered, covering home, community, school, and hospital settings for children with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. The search strategy will be conducted in 3 phases: initial limited search, comprehensive database search, and reference list search of the included articles. The MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO, Scopus, Ichushi-Web, and CiNii databases will be searched, with no restrictions on language or publication date. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers. We will evaluate the final synthesized findings using the ConQual approach.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration number: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024499042.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to explore the experiences of siblings of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.

Introduction: With improved life expectancy of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities, the research focus is on care at home and in the community. Although parents are the primary caregivers, siblings often assume the role of young caregivers, bearing the weight of caregiving responsibilities. Thus, a synthesis of qualitative findings is required regarding their experiences to facilitate the development of effective support strategies.

Inclusion criteria: Siblings of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities will be included, defined as children with an IQ of ≤40 or mental development below a 2-year-old's level, coupled with an inability to walk independently. Disabled children aged <20 years will be included. There will be no restrictions on the siblings' age or type of relationship. Qualitative studies on experiences, caregiving burdens, challenges, difficulties, and frustration in daily life will be considered, covering home, community, school, and hospital settings for children with disabilities.

Methods: We will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. The search strategy will be conducted in 3 phases: initial limited search, comprehensive database search, and reference list search of the included articles. The MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO, Scopus, Ichushi-Web, and CiNii databases will be searched, with no restrictions on language or publication date. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers. We will evaluate the final synthesized findings using the ConQual approach.

Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42024499042.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极重度智力和多重残疾儿童兄弟姐妹的经历:定性系统审查协议。
目的本系统性综述旨在探讨深度智障和多重残疾儿童兄弟姐妹的经历:随着重度智障和多重残疾儿童预期寿命的延长,研究重点集中在家庭和社区护理方面。虽然父母是主要的照顾者,但兄弟姐妹往往承担着年轻照顾者的角色,承担着照顾责任的重担。因此,需要对他们的经历进行定性研究,以促进制定有效的支持策略:智商≤40或智力发育低于两岁儿童水平,且不能独立行走的儿童。残疾儿童的年龄 方法:我们将按照 JBI 的方法对定性证据进行系统性审查。检索策略将分三个阶段进行:最初的有限检索、全面的数据库检索以及对收录文章的参考文献列表检索。我们将检索 MEDLINE、CINAHL Plus、PsycINFO、Scopus、Ichushi-Web 和 CiNii 数据库,语言和出版日期不限。研究选择、严格评估、数据提取和数据综合将由两名独立审稿人进行。我们将采用 ConQual 方法对最终的综合结果进行评估:系统综述注册编号:PROCERCO CRD42024499042。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
期刊最新文献
Value-based outcome evaluation methods used by occupational therapists in primary care: a scoping review. Parents' and guardians' experiences of barriers and facilitators in accessing autism spectrum disorder diagnostic services for their children: a qualitative systematic review. Evidence on the accreditation of health professionals' education in the WHO Africa region: a scoping review protocol. Barriers and facilitators to designing, maintaining, and utilizing rare disease patient registries: a scoping review protocol. Supporting professional practice transition in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1