Estimating the impact of wildlife damage compensation policy on farmers’ incomes

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Journal for Nature Conservation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126709
Zhuoya Ma , Jing Li , Rongyuan Chen , Xue Wei , Wenhui Chen
{"title":"Estimating the impact of wildlife damage compensation policy on farmers’ incomes","authors":"Zhuoya Ma ,&nbsp;Jing Li ,&nbsp;Rongyuan Chen ,&nbsp;Xue Wei ,&nbsp;Wenhui Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>At present, the conflict between humans and wildlife in China is becoming more serious, and the wildlife damage compensation policy, as an important part of the ecological compensation system, has become an important means to alleviate the contradiction between wildlife protection and farm household development. This study empirically examines the mechanism of action and analyses the impact of the pilot wildlife damage compensation policy on farmers’ incomes, using Chinese provincial panel data from 2004 to 2021, and employing synthetic control methods, double difference models and moderated effects models. The results show that: (1) At the provincial level, the wildlife damage compensation policy can significantly increase farmers’ income by 16.7 %, which has been validated through a series of robustness tests. (2) Further analysis using micro-survey data shows that the wildlife compensation policy significantly increases farmers’ income by 22.5 %. (3) Mechanism analysis reveals that the wildlife damage compensation policy can increase rural agricultural employment by 4.3 %, thereby increasing farmers’ income. (4) Heterogeneity analyses indicate that wildlife damage compensation policy has different effects on farmers’ income. Among these, the impact on low-income farmers is more pronounced. Understanding the impact and heterogeneity of wildlife damage compensation policy on farmers’ income can facilitate the design of targeted compensation policies to address the mismatch between conservation and development, thereby achieving the policy objective of promoting a symbiotic coexistence between wildlife conservation and farmers’ economic interests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 126709"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138124001584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At present, the conflict between humans and wildlife in China is becoming more serious, and the wildlife damage compensation policy, as an important part of the ecological compensation system, has become an important means to alleviate the contradiction between wildlife protection and farm household development. This study empirically examines the mechanism of action and analyses the impact of the pilot wildlife damage compensation policy on farmers’ incomes, using Chinese provincial panel data from 2004 to 2021, and employing synthetic control methods, double difference models and moderated effects models. The results show that: (1) At the provincial level, the wildlife damage compensation policy can significantly increase farmers’ income by 16.7 %, which has been validated through a series of robustness tests. (2) Further analysis using micro-survey data shows that the wildlife compensation policy significantly increases farmers’ income by 22.5 %. (3) Mechanism analysis reveals that the wildlife damage compensation policy can increase rural agricultural employment by 4.3 %, thereby increasing farmers’ income. (4) Heterogeneity analyses indicate that wildlife damage compensation policy has different effects on farmers’ income. Among these, the impact on low-income farmers is more pronounced. Understanding the impact and heterogeneity of wildlife damage compensation policy on farmers’ income can facilitate the design of targeted compensation policies to address the mismatch between conservation and development, thereby achieving the policy objective of promoting a symbiotic coexistence between wildlife conservation and farmers’ economic interests.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估算野生动物损害补偿政策对农民收入的影响
当前,我国人与野生动物之间的矛盾日趋严重,野生动物损害补偿政策作为生态补偿制度的重要组成部分,已成为缓解野生动物保护与农户发展之间矛盾的重要手段。本研究利用 2004 年至 2021 年中国省级面板数据,采用合成控制法、双重差分模型和调节效应模型,实证检验了野生动物损害补偿试点政策的作用机理,分析了野生动物损害补偿试点政策对农户收入的影响。结果表明(1)在省级层面,野生动物损害补偿政策能显著增加农民收入 16.7%,这一点通过一系列稳健性检验得到了验证。(2)利用微观调查数据进行的进一步分析表明,野生动物补偿政策显著增加了 22.5%的农民收入。(3)机制分析表明,野生动物损害补偿政策可以增加农村农业就业 4.3%,从而增加农民收入。(4)异质性分析表明,野生动物损害补偿政策对农民收入有不同的影响。其中,对低收入农户的影响更为明显。了解野生动物损害补偿政策对农民收入的影响和异质性,有助于设计有针对性的补偿政策,解决保护与发展不匹配的问题,从而实现促进野生动物保护与农民经济利益共生共存的政策目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Nature Conservation
Journal for Nature Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation. Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Corrigendum to “Surviving the Tide: Assessing Guiana dolphin persistence amidst growing threats in a protected estuary in South-eastern Brazil” [J. Nature Conserv. 82 (2024) 126713] From virtue to sin: Is the installation of bat boxes an effective conservation measure or a potential pitfall for vulnerable bat species? Paying for green tide management or participating in cleanup activities? Testing and controlling for payment vehicle bias in the valuation of ecological damage caused by green tides Predicting climate driven habitat shifts for the Egyptian vulture in Punjab, Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1