Effect of spirulina on risk of hospitalization among patients with COVID-19: the TOGETHER randomized trial

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS American Journal of Clinical Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.06.016
{"title":"Effect of spirulina on risk of hospitalization among patients with COVID-19: the TOGETHER randomized trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.06.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Algae-derived nutraceuticals, such as spirulina, have been reported to have biological activities that may minimize clinical consequences to COVID-19 infections.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to determine whether spirulina is an effective treatment for high-risk patients with early COVID-19 in an outpatient setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The TOGETHER trial is a placebo-controlled, randomized, platform trial conducted in Brazil. Eligible participants were symptomatic adults with a positive rapid test for SARS-CoV-2 older than 50 y or with a known risk factor for disease severity. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or spirulina (1 g twice daily for 14 d). The primary end point was hospitalization defined as either retention in a COVID-19 emergency setting for &gt;6 h or transfer to tertiary hospital owing to COVID-19 at 28 d. Secondary outcomes included time-to-hospitalization, mortality, and adverse drug reactions. We used a Bayesian framework to compare spirulina with placebo.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We recruited 1126 participants, 569 randomly assigned to spirulina and 557 to placebo. The median age was 49.0 y, and 65.3% were female. The primary outcome occurred in 11.2% in the spirulina group and 8.1% in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.24; 95% credible interval: 0.84, 1.86). There were no differences in emergency department visit (OR: 1.21; 95% credible interval: 0.81, 1.83), nor time to symptom relief (hazard ratio: 0.90; 95% credible interval: 0.79, 1.03). Spirulina also not demonstrate important treatment effects in the prespecified subgroups defined by age, sex, BMI, days since symptom onset, or vaccination status.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Spirulina has no any clinical benefits as an outpatient therapy for COVID-19 compared with placebo with respect to reducing the retention in an emergency setting or COVID-19–related hospitalization. There are no differences between spirulina and placebo for other secondary outcomes.</p><p>This trial was registered at <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> as NCT04727424.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002916524005884","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Algae-derived nutraceuticals, such as spirulina, have been reported to have biological activities that may minimize clinical consequences to COVID-19 infections.

Objectives

This study aimed to determine whether spirulina is an effective treatment for high-risk patients with early COVID-19 in an outpatient setting.

Methods

The TOGETHER trial is a placebo-controlled, randomized, platform trial conducted in Brazil. Eligible participants were symptomatic adults with a positive rapid test for SARS-CoV-2 older than 50 y or with a known risk factor for disease severity. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or spirulina (1 g twice daily for 14 d). The primary end point was hospitalization defined as either retention in a COVID-19 emergency setting for >6 h or transfer to tertiary hospital owing to COVID-19 at 28 d. Secondary outcomes included time-to-hospitalization, mortality, and adverse drug reactions. We used a Bayesian framework to compare spirulina with placebo.

Results

We recruited 1126 participants, 569 randomly assigned to spirulina and 557 to placebo. The median age was 49.0 y, and 65.3% were female. The primary outcome occurred in 11.2% in the spirulina group and 8.1% in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.24; 95% credible interval: 0.84, 1.86). There were no differences in emergency department visit (OR: 1.21; 95% credible interval: 0.81, 1.83), nor time to symptom relief (hazard ratio: 0.90; 95% credible interval: 0.79, 1.03). Spirulina also not demonstrate important treatment effects in the prespecified subgroups defined by age, sex, BMI, days since symptom onset, or vaccination status.

Conclusions

Spirulina has no any clinical benefits as an outpatient therapy for COVID-19 compared with placebo with respect to reducing the retention in an emergency setting or COVID-19–related hospitalization. There are no differences between spirulina and placebo for other secondary outcomes.

This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04727424.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
螺旋藻对 COVID-19 患者住院风险的影响:TOGETHER 随机试验
背景据报道,螺旋藻等藻类提取的营养保健品具有生物活性,可将 COVID-19 感染的临床后果降至最低。方法TOGETHER 试验是在巴西进行的一项安慰剂对照随机平台试验。符合条件的参与者均为 50 岁以上、SARS-CoV-2 快速检测呈阳性的无症状成人,或具有导致疾病严重性的已知危险因素。患者被随机分配接受安慰剂或螺旋藻(每次 1 克,每天两次,连续 14 天)治疗。主要终点是住院治疗,即在COVID-19急诊留院6小时或28天后因COVID-19转入三级医院。我们采用贝叶斯框架对螺旋藻与安慰剂进行了比较。结果我们招募了1126名参与者,其中569人随机分配到螺旋藻,557人分配到安慰剂。中位年龄为 49.0 岁,65.3% 为女性。螺旋藻组中有11.2%的人出现主要结果,安慰剂组中有8.1%的人出现主要结果(几率比[OR]:1.24;95%可信区间:0.84, 1.86)。急诊就诊率(OR:1.21;95% 可信区间:0.81-1.83)和症状缓解时间(危险比:0.90;95% 可信区间:0.79-1.03)均无差异。在按年龄、性别、体重指数、症状出现天数或疫苗接种情况定义的预设亚组中,螺旋藻也未显示出重要的治疗效果。结论 螺旋藻作为 COVID-19 的门诊疗法,与安慰剂相比,在减少急诊留院或与 COVID-19 相关的住院方面没有任何临床益处。在其他次要结果方面,螺旋藻与安慰剂之间没有差异。该试验已在 clinicaltrials.gov 登记为 NCT04727424。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
332
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is recognized as the most highly rated peer-reviewed, primary research journal in nutrition and dietetics.It focuses on publishing the latest research on various topics in nutrition, including but not limited to obesity, vitamins and minerals, nutrition and disease, and energy metabolism. Purpose: The purpose of AJCN is to: Publish original research studies relevant to human and clinical nutrition. Consider well-controlled clinical studies describing scientific mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of dietary interventions in the context of disease prevention or health benefits. Encourage public health and epidemiologic studies relevant to human nutrition. Promote innovative investigations of nutritional questions employing epigenetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches. Include solicited editorials, book reviews, solicited or unsolicited review articles, invited controversy position papers, and letters to the Editor related to prior AJCN articles. Peer Review Process: All submitted material with scientific content undergoes peer review by the Editors or their designees before acceptance for publication.
期刊最新文献
Metabolomics signatures of sweetened beverages and added sugar are related to anthropometric measures of adiposity in young individuals: results from a cohort study. Childhood Nutritional Factors and Cardiometabolic Outcomes at 9-11 y of Age: Findings from the ROLO Longitudinal Birth Cohort Study. Perceptions and preferences for environmentally sustainable food and associated factors: a cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative survey of United States consumers. Cause-specific and all-cause mortalities in vegetarian compared with those in nonvegetarian participants from the Adventist Health Study-2 cohort. Navigating complex nutritional challenges after bariatric surgery: malnutrition, multiple nutrient deficiencies, and gastrointestinal dysfunction in pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1