Does the spatial distribution of afforestation by government and farmers in Beijing follow a random pattern?

IF 4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Applied Geography Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103403
Huiwen Ma , Maojun Wang , Juanjuan Zhao , Tao Liu , Guangzhong Cao
{"title":"Does the spatial distribution of afforestation by government and farmers in Beijing follow a random pattern?","authors":"Huiwen Ma ,&nbsp;Maojun Wang ,&nbsp;Juanjuan Zhao ,&nbsp;Tao Liu ,&nbsp;Guangzhong Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The forestland expansion is the joint efforts by various behavioral actors, and among them governments and farmers play a more important role in it. However, their afforestation behaviors haven't be together investigated. Examining Beijing metropolitan area, this research distinguishes between government-led (GA) and farmer-led (FA) afforestation on arable land, and analyzes their spatial characteristics and the influencing factors using Ordinary Least Squares and Geographically Weighted Regression models. Our findings show: (1) Spatial distributions of GA and FA are non-random and systematically organized. GA dominates both in the areas close to the central city and at the outermost edge of the metropolitan area. FA leads in intermediate zones between GA dominant areas. (2) Both GA and FA are rational strategies for land allocation. GA in areas close to the central city is regarded as a trade-off between public benefits of afforestation and potential loss of fiscal revenue, while GA at the metropolitan area's outermost edge prioritizes ecological gains and lower land costs. FA, however, is driven by maximizing household welfare amidst the challenges brought by rural exodus and a rapid aging society. The findings deepen the existing investigations and provide a guidance for spatially organizing GA and synthetically regulating FA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 103403"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014362282400208X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The forestland expansion is the joint efforts by various behavioral actors, and among them governments and farmers play a more important role in it. However, their afforestation behaviors haven't be together investigated. Examining Beijing metropolitan area, this research distinguishes between government-led (GA) and farmer-led (FA) afforestation on arable land, and analyzes their spatial characteristics and the influencing factors using Ordinary Least Squares and Geographically Weighted Regression models. Our findings show: (1) Spatial distributions of GA and FA are non-random and systematically organized. GA dominates both in the areas close to the central city and at the outermost edge of the metropolitan area. FA leads in intermediate zones between GA dominant areas. (2) Both GA and FA are rational strategies for land allocation. GA in areas close to the central city is regarded as a trade-off between public benefits of afforestation and potential loss of fiscal revenue, while GA at the metropolitan area's outermost edge prioritizes ecological gains and lower land costs. FA, however, is driven by maximizing household welfare amidst the challenges brought by rural exodus and a rapid aging society. The findings deepen the existing investigations and provide a guidance for spatially organizing GA and synthetically regulating FA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北京政府和农民植树造林的空间分布是否遵循随机模式?
林地扩张是各种行为主体的共同努力,其中政府和农民在其中扮演着更为重要的角色。然而,他们的植树造林行为尚未被一并研究。本研究以北京都市圈为研究对象,区分了政府主导型(GA)和农民主导型(FA)的耕地造林行为,并利用普通最小二乘法和地理加权回归模型分析了它们的空间特征和影响因素。我们的研究结果表明:(1)GA 和 FA 的空间分布具有非随机性和系统性。在靠近中心城市的地区和大都市区的最外缘,GA 均占主导地位。在 GA 优势区域之间的中间地带,FA 占主导地位。(2) GA 和 FA 都是合理的土地分配策略。在靠近中心城市的地区,GA 被认为是在植树造林的公共利益和潜在的财政收入损失之间的权衡,而在大都市区最外缘的 GA 则优先考虑生态收益和较低的土地成本。而 FA 的驱动力则是在农村人口外流和社会快速老龄化带来的挑战下实现家庭福利最大化。研究结果深化了现有研究,为从空间上组织 GA 和综合调控 FA 提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Geography
Applied Geography GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.
期刊最新文献
Methamphetamine spread in the Seoul metropolitan area: Geographical random forest modeling approach Editorial Board Uncovering the similarity and heterogeneity of metro stations: From passenger mobility, land use, and streetscapes semantics Spatio-temporal heterogeneity and influencing factors in the synergistic enhancement of urban ecological resilience: Evidence from the Yellow River Basin of China Multiple local co-agglomeration: Modelling spatial-temporal variations of coworking spaces and creative industries clustering in two central European Capitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1