Donor-site safety in microvascular lymph node transfer for breast cancer-related lymphedema using reverse lymphatic mapping—A prospective study

{"title":"Donor-site safety in microvascular lymph node transfer for breast cancer-related lymphedema using reverse lymphatic mapping—A prospective study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.08.063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is one option among other surgical treatments in the management of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). The cause of concern regarding VLNT harvested from the groin has been the potential development of secondary lower-extremity lymphedema. This study explored the risks associated with donor-site morbidity following groin VLNT, with or without concomitant breast reconstruction.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The cohort comprised data from the Lymfactin® Phase I and II trials, conducted from 2016 to 2019, that used perioperative reverse lymphatic mapping. The volume of the lower extremities was measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative, and the adverse events were documented during study visits.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Altogether, 51 women with a mean age of 55.5 years were recruited. The mean duration of BCRL was 31.8 months. Among these, 25 (49%) underwent VLNT (VLNT-group) and 26 (51%) underwent VLNT in combination with breast reconstruction (VLNT-BR group). The groups were similar in terms of age, (p = 0.766), BMI (p = 0.316), and duration of BCRL (p = 0.994). Across a period of one year, the volume difference between the lower extremities changed by 22.6 ml (range: −813 to 860.2 ml) (p = 0.067). None of the patients had lower-extremity volume difference exceeding 10% at the 12-month follow-up visit. The most frequent adverse events were postoperative pain (17.7%), wound healing issues (11.8%), and seroma formation (11.8%). Most adverse events (64.6%) were classified as minor.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This prospective study demonstrated that groin VLNT with reverse lymphatic mapping appears safe and does not increase the risk of secondary donor-site lymphedema within one year postoperatively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524005199/pdfft?md5=9654833992ea0ae708f6653c8a8fbb1e&pid=1-s2.0-S1748681524005199-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524005199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is one option among other surgical treatments in the management of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). The cause of concern regarding VLNT harvested from the groin has been the potential development of secondary lower-extremity lymphedema. This study explored the risks associated with donor-site morbidity following groin VLNT, with or without concomitant breast reconstruction.

Method

The cohort comprised data from the Lymfactin® Phase I and II trials, conducted from 2016 to 2019, that used perioperative reverse lymphatic mapping. The volume of the lower extremities was measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative, and the adverse events were documented during study visits.

Results

Altogether, 51 women with a mean age of 55.5 years were recruited. The mean duration of BCRL was 31.8 months. Among these, 25 (49%) underwent VLNT (VLNT-group) and 26 (51%) underwent VLNT in combination with breast reconstruction (VLNT-BR group). The groups were similar in terms of age, (p = 0.766), BMI (p = 0.316), and duration of BCRL (p = 0.994). Across a period of one year, the volume difference between the lower extremities changed by 22.6 ml (range: −813 to 860.2 ml) (p = 0.067). None of the patients had lower-extremity volume difference exceeding 10% at the 12-month follow-up visit. The most frequent adverse events were postoperative pain (17.7%), wound healing issues (11.8%), and seroma formation (11.8%). Most adverse events (64.6%) were classified as minor.

Conclusions

This prospective study demonstrated that groin VLNT with reverse lymphatic mapping appears safe and does not increase the risk of secondary donor-site lymphedema within one year postoperatively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用反向淋巴图谱进行微血管淋巴结转移治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的供体部位安全性--一项前瞻性研究
背景血管化淋巴结转移(VLNT)是治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)的手术疗法之一。从腹股沟进行的血管化淋巴结转移令人担忧,因为可能会继发下肢淋巴水肿。本研究探讨了腹股沟VLNT术后与供体部位发病率相关的风险,无论是否同时进行乳房重建。方法队列包括2016年至2019年进行的Lymfactin® I期和II期试验的数据,这些试验使用了围手术期反向淋巴映射。术前以及术后3、6和12个月时测量下肢的体积,并在研究访问期间记录不良事件。结果共招募了51名女性,平均年龄为55.5岁。BCRL 的平均持续时间为 31.8 个月。其中 25 人(49%)接受了 VLNT(VLNT 组),26 人(51%)接受了 VLNT 联合乳房重建(VLNT-BR 组)。两组患者在年龄(p = 0.766)、体重指数(p = 0.316)和 BCRL 持续时间(p = 0.994)方面相似。在一年的时间里,下肢之间的体积差变化了 22.6 毫升(范围:-813 至 860.2 毫升)(p = 0.067)。在 12 个月的随访中,没有一名患者的下肢体积差异超过 10%。最常见的不良反应是术后疼痛(17.7%)、伤口愈合问题(11.8%)和血清肿形成(11.8%)。结论这项前瞻性研究表明,腹股沟 VLNT 术配合反向淋巴映射似乎是安全的,不会增加术后一年内继发性供体部位淋巴水肿的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
期刊最新文献
Trends in advanced practice providers in plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2013–2021 Editorial Board Long-term results and patient-reported outcomes after vascularized fibular graft use in the treatment of post-traumatic bone defects of femur shaft and tibia: A retrospective cohort and cross-sectional survey study Taps, wicks, bridges and LIFTs: Clarification on the origins of lymphatic flaps The curious case of medical advisor: The house of cards in aesthetic medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1