S. Świerk , M. Przybyło , J. Flaga , K. Szczepanik , W. Białek , P. Flieger , P. Górka
{"title":"Effect of butyrate sources in a high-concentrate diet on rumen structure and function in growing rams","authors":"S. Świerk , M. Przybyło , J. Flaga , K. Szczepanik , W. Białek , P. Flieger , P. Górka","doi":"10.1016/j.animal.2024.101285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dietary butyrate is considered to have mostly positive impacts on the ruminal epithelium. However, its supplementation in a high-concentrate diet may not be justified as excessive ruminal butyrate may negatively affect the rumen. Furthermore, butyrate impact on the rumen may depend on its source. Thirty-two Świniarka growing rams (30.6 ± 2.5 kg; 11–14 months of age) were used to investigate the effect of a high-concentrate diet and sodium butyrate (<strong>SB</strong>) or tributyrin (<strong>TB</strong>) supplementation in a high-concentrate diet on the rumen structure and selected functions. The rams were allocated to four treatments and fed diets with: (1) low concentrate inclusion (22.5% of diet DM; <strong>L</strong>); (2) high concentrate inclusion (60% of diet DM; <strong>H</strong>); (3) H with SB (3.2% of diet DM; <strong>H+SB</strong>); and (4) H with TB (2.93% of diet DM; <strong>H+TB</strong>). The preplanned contrasts were used for treatment comparisons (L vs H treatments (H, H+SB, and H+TB), H vs H+SB, and H vs H+TB). The BW, BW gain and DM intake did not differ between treatments. In the atrium ruminis, epithelium thickness did not differ between the L and H treatments (<em>P</em> = 0.46), tended to be higher for H+SB than for H (<em>P</em> = 0.09) but did not differ between H+TB and H (<em>P</em> = 0.61). The expression of downregulated in adenoma was higher for L than for H treatments (<em>P</em> = 0.03) but was not affected by SB or TB supplementation (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.26). In the ventral rumen, the mucosa surface and epithelium thickness were lower for L than for H treatments (<em>P</em> < 0.01), were or tended to be higher for H+SB than for H (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.06) but did not differ between H+TB and H (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.26). The expression of monocarboxylate transporter 1 was lower for L than for H treatments (<em>P</em> = 0.02) but was not affected by SB or TB supplementation (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.28). The expression of putative anion transporter-1 and downregulated in adenoma did not differ between the L and H treatments (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.76); however, expression of the former tended to be higher and the latter tended to be lower for H+SB than for H (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.09), whereas no differences were observed between H+TB and H (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.14). In summary, SB supplementation, but not TB supplementation, in a high-concentrate diet stimulated ruminal epithelium growth and affected short-chain fatty acid transporters expression in the ruminal epithelium.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50789,"journal":{"name":"Animal","volume":"18 9","pages":"Article 101285"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731124002167/pdfft?md5=8e33cb82d245bc32e707d6f5e0863003&pid=1-s2.0-S1751731124002167-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731124002167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dietary butyrate is considered to have mostly positive impacts on the ruminal epithelium. However, its supplementation in a high-concentrate diet may not be justified as excessive ruminal butyrate may negatively affect the rumen. Furthermore, butyrate impact on the rumen may depend on its source. Thirty-two Świniarka growing rams (30.6 ± 2.5 kg; 11–14 months of age) were used to investigate the effect of a high-concentrate diet and sodium butyrate (SB) or tributyrin (TB) supplementation in a high-concentrate diet on the rumen structure and selected functions. The rams were allocated to four treatments and fed diets with: (1) low concentrate inclusion (22.5% of diet DM; L); (2) high concentrate inclusion (60% of diet DM; H); (3) H with SB (3.2% of diet DM; H+SB); and (4) H with TB (2.93% of diet DM; H+TB). The preplanned contrasts were used for treatment comparisons (L vs H treatments (H, H+SB, and H+TB), H vs H+SB, and H vs H+TB). The BW, BW gain and DM intake did not differ between treatments. In the atrium ruminis, epithelium thickness did not differ between the L and H treatments (P = 0.46), tended to be higher for H+SB than for H (P = 0.09) but did not differ between H+TB and H (P = 0.61). The expression of downregulated in adenoma was higher for L than for H treatments (P = 0.03) but was not affected by SB or TB supplementation (P ≥ 0.26). In the ventral rumen, the mucosa surface and epithelium thickness were lower for L than for H treatments (P < 0.01), were or tended to be higher for H+SB than for H (P ≤ 0.06) but did not differ between H+TB and H (P ≥ 0.26). The expression of monocarboxylate transporter 1 was lower for L than for H treatments (P = 0.02) but was not affected by SB or TB supplementation (P ≥ 0.28). The expression of putative anion transporter-1 and downregulated in adenoma did not differ between the L and H treatments (P ≥ 0.76); however, expression of the former tended to be higher and the latter tended to be lower for H+SB than for H (P ≤ 0.09), whereas no differences were observed between H+TB and H (P ≥ 0.14). In summary, SB supplementation, but not TB supplementation, in a high-concentrate diet stimulated ruminal epithelium growth and affected short-chain fatty acid transporters expression in the ruminal epithelium.
期刊介绍:
Editorial board
animal attracts the best research in animal biology and animal systems from across the spectrum of the agricultural, biomedical, and environmental sciences. It is the central element in an exciting collaboration between the British Society of Animal Science (BSAS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and the European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP) and represents a merging of three scientific journals: Animal Science; Animal Research; Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. animal publishes original cutting-edge research, ''hot'' topics and horizon-scanning reviews on animal-related aspects of the life sciences at the molecular, cellular, organ, whole animal and production system levels. The main subject areas include: breeding and genetics; nutrition; physiology and functional biology of systems; behaviour, health and welfare; farming systems, environmental impact and climate change; product quality, human health and well-being. Animal models and papers dealing with the integration of research between these topics and their impact on the environment and people are particularly welcome.