How meeting the ten pedometrics challenges can deliver healthy-soil contributions to SDG-related ecosystem services

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE European Journal of Soil Science Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1111/ejss.13550
Johan Bouma, Jan Adriaan Reijneveld
{"title":"How meeting the ten pedometrics challenges can deliver healthy-soil contributions to SDG-related ecosystem services","authors":"Johan Bouma,&nbsp;Jan Adriaan Reijneveld","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When considering ecosystem services in line with relevant Sustainable Development Goals, the proposed logical sequence of the ten pedometric challenges can form a framework defining effective contributions by the soil science discipline to the sustainability challenge facing society. Defining relatively simple, but scientifically sound, indicators and thresholds for ecosystem services can be the basis for a transparent regulatory system justifying payment for ecosystem services provided to society. The current serious lack of trust between the policy and farming arenas can and should be restored by scientists and farmers working jointly in Living Labs, aiming to become Lighthouses, to be part of Communites of Practice (CoP). A Living Lab case study is reviewed showing that much know-how is already available to define indicators and innovative cutting-edge methodology adds attractive new opportunities for rapid and relatively cheap characterizations. Field work remains essential and just routinely applying standard techniques fed by existing databases may lead to poor results. Research on indicator-thresholds has a high priority. In the case study, the important soil fertility indicator was based on the current procedure of field sampling and fertilization recommendations by specialized agencies, that is already followed by 85% of farmers. This could be expanded by including indicators for other ecosystem services thereby contributing substantially to the societal sustainability debate. Soil health plays a key role when contributing to all ecosystem services. Showing this with specific examples in a Living Lab/Lighthouse and CoP context is the best way to promote the profession which is needed to justify current major funding. Not only cutting-edge research can contribute to defining indicators and thresholds. A hundred years of research has produced many valuable insights and methodologies that can be applied as well. The: ‘better’ can be the enemy of the: ‘good’. The sustainable development challenge is highly urgent: there is no time to lose.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.13550","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When considering ecosystem services in line with relevant Sustainable Development Goals, the proposed logical sequence of the ten pedometric challenges can form a framework defining effective contributions by the soil science discipline to the sustainability challenge facing society. Defining relatively simple, but scientifically sound, indicators and thresholds for ecosystem services can be the basis for a transparent regulatory system justifying payment for ecosystem services provided to society. The current serious lack of trust between the policy and farming arenas can and should be restored by scientists and farmers working jointly in Living Labs, aiming to become Lighthouses, to be part of Communites of Practice (CoP). A Living Lab case study is reviewed showing that much know-how is already available to define indicators and innovative cutting-edge methodology adds attractive new opportunities for rapid and relatively cheap characterizations. Field work remains essential and just routinely applying standard techniques fed by existing databases may lead to poor results. Research on indicator-thresholds has a high priority. In the case study, the important soil fertility indicator was based on the current procedure of field sampling and fertilization recommendations by specialized agencies, that is already followed by 85% of farmers. This could be expanded by including indicators for other ecosystem services thereby contributing substantially to the societal sustainability debate. Soil health plays a key role when contributing to all ecosystem services. Showing this with specific examples in a Living Lab/Lighthouse and CoP context is the best way to promote the profession which is needed to justify current major funding. Not only cutting-edge research can contribute to defining indicators and thresholds. A hundred years of research has produced many valuable insights and methodologies that can be applied as well. The: ‘better’ can be the enemy of the: ‘good’. The sustainable development challenge is highly urgent: there is no time to lose.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应对十项计步挑战如何实现健康土壤对可持续发展目标相关生态系统服务的贡献
在根据相关的可持续发展目标考虑生态系统服务时,拟议的十项计步挑战的逻辑顺序可以形成一个框架,确定土壤科学学科对社会面临的可持续性挑战做出的有效贡献。为生态系统服务定义相对简单但科学合理的指标和阈值,可作为透明监管系统的基础,证明为社会提供的生态系统服务付费是合理的。目前,政策与农业领域之间严重缺乏信任,科学家与农民在 "生活实验室"(旨在成为 "灯塔",成为实践社区 (CoP) 的一部分)中共同努力,可以而且应该恢复这种信任。对生活实验室案例研究的回顾表明,目前已有很多确定指标的专门技术,而创新的前沿方法为快速和相对廉价的特征描述提供了极具吸引力的新机遇。实地工作仍然非常重要,只是常规地应用现有数据库提供的标准技术可能会导致结果不佳。指标阈值研究是当务之急。在案例研究中,重要的土壤肥力指标是基于目前的实地采样程序和专门机构的施肥建议,85% 的农民已经遵循了这一程序。可以通过纳入其他生态系统服务的指标来扩展该指标,从而为社会可持续性辩论做出重大贡献。土壤健康在促进所有生态系统服务方面发挥着关键作用。在 "生活实验室/灯塔 "和 "合作伙 伴 "背景下以具体实例展示这一点是促进专业发展的最佳方式,这也是目前主要资金来源所需要的。并非只有前沿研究才能有助于定义指标和阈值。一百年来的研究已经产生了许多有价值的见解和方法,也可以加以应用。更好 "可能是 "好 "的敌人:好 "的敌人。可持续发展的挑战非常紧迫:刻不容缓。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
期刊最新文献
Cover cropping in organic reduced tillage systems: Maximizing soil cover or plant above ground biomass input? No relationship between outputs of simple humus balance calculators (VDLUFA and STAND) and soil organic carbon trends A GSD‐driven approach to deriving stochastic soil strength parameters under hybrid machine learning models Further reduction in soil bacterial diversity under severe acidification in European temperate forests Effect of brackish water inundation on temperate coastal acid sulfate soils under different vegetation types
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1